Special Issue - Articles

Hilbert, completeness and geometry


This paper aims to show how the mathematical content of Hilbert's Axiom of Completeness consists in an attempt to solve the more general problem of the relationship between intuition and formalization. Hilbert found the accordance between these two sides of mathematical knowledge at a logical level, clarifying the necessary and sufficient conditions for a good formalization of geometry. We will tackle the problem of what is, for Hilbert, the definition of geometry. The solution of this problem will bring out how Hilbert's conception of mathematics is not as innovative as his conception of the axiomatic method. The role that the demonstrative tools play in Hilbert's foundational reflections will also drive us to deal with the problem of the purity of methods, explicitly addressed by Hilbert. In this respect Hilbert's position is very innovative and deeply linked to his modern conception of the axiomatic method. In the end we will show that the role played by the Axiom of Completeness for geometry is the same as the Axiom of Induction for arithmetic and of Church-Turing thesis for computability theory. We end this paper arguing that set theory is the right context in which applying the axiomatic method to mathematics and we postpone to a sequel of this work the attempt to offer a solution similar to Hilbert's for the completeness of set theory.

Full Text:


DOI: https://doi.org/10.13130/2037-4445/1497

NBN: http://nbn.depositolegale.it/urn%3Anbn%3Ait%3Aunimi-6941


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 Rivista Italiana di Filosofia Analitica Junior

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Rivista Italiana di Filosofia Analitica Junior
ISSN: 2037-4445. 2010 - 2017. Some rights reserved.