Prenatal genetic counselling: issues and perspectives for pre-conceptional health care in Emilia Romagna (Northern Italy)

Authors

  • Marco Lucci St. Anna University Hospital,Ferrara
  • Gianni Astolfi IMER Registry (Emilia Romagna Registry of Birth Defects), Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria – Ferrara
  • Stefania Bigoni St. Anna University Hospital, Ferrara
  • Anna Baroncini Azienda Ospedaliera Imola
  • Olga Calabrese Azienda Ospedaliera Imola
  • Alessandra Ferlini St. Anna University Hospital, Ferrara
  • Giulia Parmeggiani St. Anna University Hospital, Ferrara
  • Eva Pompili Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria – Bologna
  • Marco Seri Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria – Bologna
  • Elisa Calzolari IMER Registry (Emilia Romagna Registry of Birth Defects), Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria – Ferrara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2427/8870

Abstract

Background: there are many reasons why a couple may seek specialist genetic counselling about foetal risk. The referral for prenatal genetic counselling of women with a known risk factor during pregnancy has many disadvantages. Despite this, 10-20% of women seek counselling when already pregnant.

Methods: data on 804 pregnant women out of 2 158 (37.3%) referred for genetic counselling in 2010 to three Clinical Genetic Services were retrospectively analysed. Patients referred only for advanced maternal age were analysed in a separate study.

Results: the 804 pregnant women were referred for 932 counselling issues. 325 issues (34.9%) were identified during pregnancy and 607 (65.1%) were pre-existing. 81.2% of Italians compared to 41.8% of the non-Italians (P<0.01) had access to counselling before 13 weeks of gestation for risk factors present before pregnancy. An accurate genetic diagnosis was available in 25.0% of cases. In 21.7% of the cases an elevated a priori risk of >10% for the unborn child was established.

Conclusions: genetic services provide 37.3% of counselling to pregnant women. Referral for genetic counselling during pregnancy can require considerable resources and pose significant ethical and organizational challenges. New models of pregnancy care in the community need to be developed. General practitioners and gynaecologists have an important role in the referral and in the defence of equity of access and a more structured approach to the participation of medical geneticists to primary practice should be considered.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-16

Issue

Section

Original articles