The Obstetric Panorama in the Metropolitan Region of Baixada Santista – Brazil: Prevalence and Profile of Parturients
Prevalence and Profile of Parturients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54103/2282-0930/28130Keywords:
cesarean delivery, vaginal delivery, normal delivery, live birth, prenatal, epidemiologyAbstract
Background: The birth of a child is a significant milestone for mothers and families. However, concerns regarding the type and safety of delivery persist. Evidence shows that vaginal delivery provides immunological and respiratory benefits for the baby and offers protective factors for the mother. Despite this, cesarean sections remain prevalent, particularly in developing regions.
Objective: This study aimed to analyze delivery data from the Região Metropolitana da Baixada Santista (RMBS) between 2019 and 2022, identifying the predominant delivery method and examining the socioeconomic and cultural profiles of mothers.
Methods: Data was obtained from the TABNET/DATASUS database in the Live Birth Information System (SISNAC).
Results: Between 2019 and 2022, 86,198 deliveries were recorded, with 53% being cesarean sections and 47% vaginal deliveries, exceeding the 15% cesarean rate recommended by the WHO. Vaginal delivery was more common among mothers aged 10–24 years, while cesarean sections predominated among those aged 25–54 years. Women with 1–11 years of education favored vaginal delivery, while those with ≥12 years of education had cesarean rates more than double vaginal deliveries. Cesarean sections were more prevalent among white and yellow ethnicities. Single mothers predominantly chose vaginal delivery, whereas married, widowed, separated, or cohabiting women favored cesarean sections.
Conclusion: The high prevalence of cesarean deliveries in RMBS appears to be associated with maternal age, education level, socioeconomic status, marital status, and prenatal care access. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to promote evidence-based delivery practices.
Downloads
References
Brazil. Ministry of Health. Secretariat of Health Care. Home labor and birth assisted by traditional midwives [electronic resource]: the Working with Traditional Midwives Program and exemplary experiences / Ministry of Health, Secretariat of Health Care. Brasília: Ministry of Health Publishing House; 2010 [in Portuguese].
Viana LVM, Ferreira KM, Mesquita MASB. Humanization of normal childbirth: a literature review. Rev Saude Foco. 2014;1(2):134–148.
de Souza Pereira AC, Sakman R, Voltarelli A, da Silva Vasconcelos AM, Nunes S, Ferreira ICC. Benefits of normal childbirth. Glob Clin Res J. 2022;2(1):e18 [in Portuguese]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5935/2763-8847.20220018
Araújo BCN, Filgueiras EV, Weber F, Carrijo MF, Doering AMLR, Monteiro ACF, Oliveira CL, Machado RR. Benefits of natural childbirth. Multidiscip Health J. 2022 Jun;12(2):36–36 [in Portuguese]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53740/rsm.v12i2.415
Andreucci CB, Cecatti JG. Performance of process indicators of the Prenatal and Birth Humanization Program in Brazil: a systematic review. Cad Saude Publica. 2011;27(6):1053–1064 [in Portuguese]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2011000600003
Guimarães NM, de Souza Freitas VC, de Senzi CG, Frias DFR, Gil GT, Lima LDDSC. Childbirth in the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS): prevalence and profile of parturients. Braz J Dev. 2021;7(2):11942–11958 [in Portuguese]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv7n2-019
de Andrade SG, de Vasconcelos YA, Carneiro ARS, Severiano ARG, Terceiro AJDM, da Silva TB, Oliveira MAS. Sociodemographic, epidemiological, and obstetric profile of parturients in a hospital and maternity ward in Sobral, Ceará. J Infect Prev Health. 2018;4 [in Portuguese]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26694/repis.v4i0.7283
Ribeiro Da Silva EA, Garcia Da Silva G, Carniel F. Profile of parturients and their newborns in a municipality in the Legal Amazon. Braz J Surg Clin Res. 2019;29(2) [in Portuguese].
São Paulo (State). State Complementary Law No. 815, of 1996. Available at: https://www.al.sp.gov.br/repositorio/legislacao/lei.complementar/1996/lei.complementar-815–30.07.1996.html [in Portuguese].
Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE). 2022 Brazilian Census. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2022 [in Portuguese].
Sociedade Beneficente Israelita Brasileira Albert Einstein. Technical Note for the organization of the Health Care Network with a focus on Primary Health Care and Specialized Outpatient Care – Women’s Health during Pregnancy, Childbirth and the Postpartum
Period [Internet]. São Paulo: Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Ministry of Health; 2019. Accessed on: April 18, 2024. Available at: https://
atencaobasica.saude.rs.gov.br/upload/arquivo/202001/03091259-nt-gestante-planificasus.pdf [in Portuguese].
de Souza AMG, de Andrade FB. What is the mortality scenario for women of reproductive age in Brazil? World Health. 2020;44:421–432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15343/0104-7809.202044421432
Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE). Civil Registry Statistics for 2022. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2022 [in Portuguese].
World Health Organization. WHO statement on Caesarean section rates. 2015. [accessed 11 Nov 2023]. Available at: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/161442/WHO_RHR_15.02_por.pdf?sequence=3 [in Portuguese].
Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Souza JP, Zhang J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jun;6(6):e005671. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021–005671. PMID: 34130991; PMCID: PMC8208001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671
National Commission for the Incorporation of Technologies into the SUS (CONITEC). Guidelines for care for pregnant women: the cesarean section. Brasília: Ministry of Health; 2015 [in Portuguese].
Melo JKF, Davim RMB, Silva RRA. Advantages and disadvantages of transpelvic and cesarean delivery: the opinion of postpartum women. Care Fundam Res J. 2015;7(4):3197–3205 [in Portuguese]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9789/2175-5361.2015.v7i4.3197-3205
Vicente AC, Lima AKBS, Lima CB. Cesarean delivery and normal delivery: an approach to risks and benefits. Health Top. 2017;17(4):24–35 [in Portuguese].
da Silva Nascimento D, da Silva Nascimento D, de Araujo Silva VF, Belarmino CMV. Nursing care during prenatal care in primary care: an integrative review. Rev Artigos Com. 2021;27:e7219-e7219 [in Portuguese].
Ximenes FMA, Oliveira MCR. The influence of maternal age on perinatal conditions. Braz J Health Promot. 2004;17(1). Available at: http://www.unifor.br/hp/revista_saude/v17-2/artigo2.pdf [in Portuguese].
Nomura RM, Alves EA, Zugaib M. Maternal complications associated with type of delivery in a university hospital. Rev Saude Publica. 2004;38(1):9–15 [in Portuguese]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102004000100002
Mauadié ACA, Bastos CLAT, Borges LA, de Almeida LPD, dos Santos Campos M, Ribeiro MGAS. Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: an epidemiological description between 2016 and 2021. Braz J Health Rev. 2024;7(4):e71504-e71504 [in Portuguese]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34119/bjhrv7n4-156
Santos JDS, et al. Epidemiological analysis of delivery routes in Brazil. 2022 [in Portuguese].
Haidar FH, Oliveira UF, Nascimento LFC. Maternal education: correlation with obstetric indicators. Cad Saude Publica. 2001;17(4):1025–1029 [in Portuguese]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2001000400037
Schiller EF. The relationship between parturient profiles and delivery routes in Brazil. 2015 [in Portuguese].
Souza EL, Carvalho ALC, Pereira BF, Souza BG, Souza GR, Ardisson GMC, et al. Factors that influence the delivery route in Brazil. Rev Med Sao Paulo. 2022;101(5):e-172947 [in Portuguese]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1679-9836.v101i5e-172947
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Eliana Souza dos Santos dos Santos , Petterson Yuri Andrade dos Santos, Lígia Maria Gonçalves Rodrigues Xavier, Elaine Marcilio Santos, Gustavo Duarte Mendes , Juliana Maria Altavista Sagretti Gallo, Sandra Kalil Bussadori, Carolina Mayumi Iegami, Marcela Leticia Leal Gonçalves, Edgar Maquigussa, Ana Paula Taboada Sobral
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2025-02-20
Published 2025-03-21
