AI-Based Tool for Early Diagnosis and Progression Prediction in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Multicenter Validation Study

Authors

  • Lilla Bonanno Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo image/svg+xml
  • Giuseppa Maresca Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo image/svg+xml
  • Angela Alibrandi Department of Economics, Unit of Statistical and Mathematical Sciences, University of Messina image/svg+xml
  • Angela Marra Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo image/svg+xml
  • Christian Salvatore Department of Science, Technology and Society, Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia ; DeepTrace Technologies SRL, Italy image/svg+xml
  • Simona Aresta Department of Science, Technology and Society, Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia ; Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Laboratory of Neuropsychology, Institute of Bari, Italy image/svg+xml
  • Agata Zirilli Department of Economics, Unit of Statistical and Mathematical Sciences, University of Messina image/svg+xml
  • Simona Cammaroto Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo image/svg+xml
  • Alessia Biondo Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo image/svg+xml
  • Angelo Quartarone Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo image/svg+xml
  • Isabella Castiglioni Department of Physics “G. Occhialini”, University of Milano-Bicocca image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54103/2282-0930/29349

Abstract

Introduction
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common cause of neurodegenerative dementia and poses a major healthcare challenge worldwide. Despite the availability of biological biomarkers, their application in routine clinical settings remains limited. Recent recommendations from eleven European scientific societies and Alzheimer Europe propose a patient-centered diagnostic workflow for memory clinics [1]. Within this context, artificial intelligence (AI) may offer valuable support for clinical staging and diagnosis based on widely available neuropsychological and MRI data [2-3].

Objectives
This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of TRACE4AD™, a CE-marked AI-based medical device, in supporting memory clinics during key diagnostic steps, specifically by assessing its ability to correctly stage cognitive decline, to classify clinical syndromes and formulate causal hypotheses (distinguishing AD from non-AD profiles), and to predict conversion to AD dementia within 24 months.

Methods
A total of 797 subjects were enrolled from 66 centers (Italy, US, Canada). All underwent 3D T1-weighted MRI and a detailed neuropsychological battery assessing multiple cognitive domains [4]. In 482 cases, CSF biomarkers (Aβ42, t-tau, p-tau) and/or [¹⁸F]FDG PET imaging were available [5]. TRACE4AD™ automatically analyzed imaging and cognitive data using an ensemble of Support Vector Machines (SVMs), with feature selection via Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Fisher Discriminant Ratio (FDR) [6-7]. Clinical performance was assessed in terms of agreement with expert clinical staging (Cohen’s kappa), diagnostic accuracy against biomarker-based classification for syndrome identification, and predictive accuracy of conversion to AD dementia at 24 months using clinical follow-up as reference.

Results
TRACE4AD™ showed substantial to almost perfect agreement with clinical staging (κ=0.81 for HS/SCI/WW, κ=0.70 for MCI/MD, κ=0.90 for moderate/severe dementia). In the subset of subjects with biomarker data (n=130), the tool correctly classified AD-related syndromes with 91% accuracy, achieving a positive predictive value of 91% and a negative predictive value of 100%. For prediction of conversion to AD-dementia at 24 months (n=341), TRACE4AD™ reached 89% sensitivity, 82% specificity, 85% overall accuracy, and an AUC of 83%. Furthermore, AI-derived brain volumetric features significantly correlated with CSF biomarkers, particularly in medial temporal regions, and cognitive performance, supporting the tool’s biological validity and interpretability.

Conclusions
TRACE4AD™ demonstrated high performance in staging, syndrome classification, and prediction of AD conversion, supporting its utility as a statistical and clinical decision-support tool. Its ability to integrate multimodal data in a reproducible, interpretable manner aligns with current intersocietal recommendations [1], providing an innovative and practical solution to enhance early diagnosis and personalized care in memory clinics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Frisoni G.B., Festari C., Massa F., et al., European intersocietal recommendations for the biomarker-based diagnosis of neurocognitive disorders. Lancet Neurol., 2024;23:302–312

[2] Salvatore C., Cerasa A., Battista P. et al., Magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: a machine learning approach. Front Neurosci., 2015;9:307-17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00307

[3] Aresta S., De Benedictis A., Fioravanti R. et al., Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Profiling and Prediction of Alzheimer’s Disease: A Machine Learning-Based Approach. Med Image Anal., 2021; 70:101985

[4] Nanni L., Salvatore C., Cerasa A., et al., Combining multiple approaches for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease. Pattern Recognit Lett., 2016;84:259-266 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2016.10.010

[5] Jack C.R., Bennett D.A., Blennow K. et al., NIA-AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement., 2018;14(4):535-62 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018

[6] Salvatore C., Battista P., Castiglioni I., Frontiers for the early diagnosis of AD by means of MRI brain imaging and Support Vector Machines. Curr Alzheimer Res., 2016;13:509-533 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1567205013666151116141705

[7] Salvatore C., Castiglioni I., A wrapped multi-label classifier for the automatic diagnosis and prognosis of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci Methods, 2018;302:58-65 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.12.016

Published

2025-09-08

How to Cite

1.
Bonanno L, Maresca G, Alibrandi A, Marra A, Salvatore C, Aresta S, et al. AI-Based Tool for Early Diagnosis and Progression Prediction in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Multicenter Validation Study. ebph [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2026 Feb. 28];. Available from: https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/ebph/article/view/29349

Issue

Section

Congress Abstract - Section 3: Metodi Biostatistici