Abstract
This article is a call for increased attention to the epistemological challenges in the scientific study of built environments. These issues are acknowledged, yet only superficially discussed, in the philosophy of architecture. While the philosophy of science has recently examined how environments shape human health, the specific problems raised by built spaces remain largely overlooked. However, it is crucial to address the epistemological foundations that underlie the ethical, aesthetic, social, and political dimensions of architecture. Evidence-Based Design illustrates this need: it aims to enhance scientific rigour in building design and improve performance. Based on a systematic review of design research, I argue that its methodological inspiration (Evidence-Based Medicine) is ill-suited to architectural contexts. A constructive update would incorporate insights from philosophy of science on experimentation, pluralism, and the role of theory in practical sciences. This case study exemplifies philosophical engagement with built environments and design research.
References
Anderson et al., 2022, ‘The bioethics of built space: health care architecture as a medical intervention’, Hastings Center Report 52(2), DOI: 10.1002/hast.1353, pp. 32–40
Bonnin, under review, ‘A critical assessment of Evidence-Based Design’s knowledge base and inspiration: a systematic review’
Bonnin, in preparation, ‘Evidence-Based Approaches as Scientific Imperialism: the Case of Evidence-Based Design’
Bonnin & Giroux, in press, ‘‘Suivre la science’ en temps de pandémie’, Lato Sensu : Revue de la Société de Philosophie des Sciences
Broadbent, 2013, Philosophy of Epidemiology, Palgrave Macmillan
Bschir & Lohse, 2022, ’Pandemics, policy, and pluralism: A Feyerabend-inspired perspective on COVID-19, Synthese 200, DOI: 10.1007/s11229-022-03923-4, p. 441
Capolongo et al., 2020, ‘COVID-19 and Healthcare Facilities: a Decalogue of Design Strategies for Resilient Hospitals’, Acta Biomed 91(9), DOI: 10.23750/abm.v91i9-S.10117, pp. 50–60
Cartwright & Efstathiou, 2008, ‘Evidence-based policy and its ranking schemes: so, where’s ethnography?’, Paper presented at the Conference of the Association of Social Anthropologists
Cartwright & Hardie, 2012, Evidence-based policy: A practical guide to doing it better, Oxford University Press
Cartwright et al., 2008, Otto Neurath: Philosophy Between Science and Politics, Cambridge University Press
Chupin, 2024, ‘Le Ph. D. en architecture est-il un doctorat en design ?’, Sciences du Design 20(2), DOI: 10.3917/sdd.020.0172, pp. 172–188
Cushing & Miller, 2020, Creating Great Places: Evidence-Based Urban Design for Health and Wellbeing, Routledge
Elliott, 2017, A tapestry of values: An introduction to values in science, Oxford University Press
Fisher, 2015: ‘Philosophy of Architecture,’ URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/architecture/, E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Hamilton, 2003, ‘The four levels of evidence-based practice’, Healthcare Design 3–4: 18–26
Hamilton & Watkins, 2008, Evidence-Based Design for Multiple Building Types, John Wiley & Sons
Krieger, 2024, Epidemiology and the people’s health: theory and context, Oxford University Press
Menatti & Casado da Rocha, 2016, ‘Landscape and Health: Connecting Psychology, Aesthetics, and Philosophy through the Concept of Affordance’, Frontiers in psychology 7, DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00571, p. 571
Parkkinen et al., 2018, Evaluating evidence of mechanisms in medicine: principles and procedures, Springer Nature
Scruton, 1979/2013, The Aesthetics of Architecture, Princeton University Press
Tuana, 2010, ‘Leading with ethics, aiming for policy: new opportunities for philosophy of science’, Synthese 177, DOI: 10.1007/s11229-010-9793-4, pp. 471–492
Ulrich, 1984, ‘View through a window may influence recovery from surgery’, Science 224(4647), DOI: 10.1126/science.6143402, pp. 420–421
Warde et al., 2021, The Environment: A History of the Idea, Johns Hopkins University Press

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Thomas Bonnin

