Thematic Section

Hallucinated Pornography: AI, Synthetic Erotics, and the Reverse-Engineered Image of Desire

Author(s)
Keywords
  • Hallucination
  • Opacity
  • Posthuman visuality
  • Reverse engineering
  • Synthetic erotics
Abstract

This article explores the evolving aesthetic of AI-generated erotic images, focusing on how hallucination, estrangement, and synthetic opacity replace the immersive realism and emotional transparency typical of traditional pornography. Through a comparative analysis of works by artists Arvida Byström and Jake Elwes, I argue that synthetic erotics do not aim for representation or immediate sensuality but operate through ambiguity, ambient affect, and resistance to capture. Arvida Byström’s In the Clouds mobilises AI-generated nude self-portraiture as a feminist strategy of opacity, pushing machinic codes of sexual legibility toward the point where they collapse into aesthetic estrangement. Jake Elwes’s Machine Learning Porn exposes the spectral traces of a neural network trained to classify and censor explicit content, rendering desire as glitch, residue, and machinic symptom. Both practices utilize hallucination as a method—reconfiguring the erotic as a speculative space of friction and delay. Drawing on feminist theory, semiotics, and posthuman media aesthetics, this paper positions synthetic erotics as a critical site for intervention in the algorithmic governance of desire, recognition, and embodiment.

References
  1. Blas, Zach. 2016. “Opacities: An Introduction.” Camera Obscura 31 (2): 149–153. https://doi.org/10.1215/02705346-3592499.
  2. Buongiorno, Federica. 2019. “Embodiment, Disembodiment and Re-embodiment in the Construction of the Digital Self.” Humana.Mente 12 (36): 310–330. https://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/290.
  3. Bystrom, Arvida (@arvidabystrom). 2024. “Instagram post, April 1, 2024.” Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/p/C5OCB_DNhN-/.
  4. Carson, Fiona, and Claire Pajaczkowska. 2000. Feminist Visual Culture. Edinburgh University Press.
  5. Cheng, Anne Anlin. 2011. Second Skin: Josephine Baker and the Modern Surface. Oxford University Press.
  6. Crawford, Kate. 2021. Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence. Yale University Press.
  7. Elwes, Jake. 2016. Machine Learning Porn. Video, 12 min. https://www.jakeelwes.com/project-MLPorn.html
  8. Fraser, Nancy. 2000. “Rethinking Recognition.” New Left Review 3 (3): 107–118.
  9. Glissant, Édouard. 1990. Poétique de la relation. Gallimard.
  10. Grau, Oliver. 2004. Virtual Art: From Illusion to Immersion. The MIT Press.
  11. Han, Byung-Chul. 2015. The Transparency Society. Stanford University Press.
  12. Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3), 575–599.
  13. Haraway, Donna. 1992. “The Promises of Monsters: A Regenerative Politics for Inappropriate/d Others.” In Cultural Studies, edited by Grossberg, Lawrence, Nelson, Cary, Treichler, Paula. Routledge.
  14. Haraway, Donna. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
  15. Hayles, Kathrine N. 1999. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. The University of Chicago Press.
  16. Hutson, James. 2024. Art and Culture in the Multiverse of Metaverses. Immersion, Presence, and Interactivity in the Digital Age. Springer.
  17. Malaspina, Roberto Paolo. 2024. “The headset as a lover: Pornography and the eroticism of immersive devices.” New Techno-Humanities 4 (1): 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techum.2024.09.001.
  18. Marling, Raili. 2021. “Opacity as a feminist strategy. Postcolonial and postsocialist entanglements with neoliberalism.” In Postcolonial and Postsocialist Dialogues. Intersections, Opacities, Challenges in Feminist Theorizing and Practice, edited by Redi Koobak, Madina Tlostanova, and Suruchi Thapar-Björker. Routledge.
  19. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1945. Phénoménologie de la perception. Gallimard.
  20. Parikka, Jussi. 2023. Operational Images: From the Visual to the Invisual. University of Minnesota Press.
  21. Pollock, Griselda. 1988. Vision and Difference: Femininity, Feminism and Histories of Art. Routledge.
  22. Roux, Liara. 2024. “Selfies, Artificial Intelligence, and Porn.” SSENSE June 4. https://www.ssense.com/en-mx/editorial/art/arvida-bystrom-interview-ai-art.
  23. Russell, Legacy. 2020. Glitch Feminism: A Manifesto. Verso.
  24. Viola, Marco, and Voto, Cristina. 2023. “Designed to abuse? Deepfakes and the non-consensual diffusion of intimate images”. Synthese 201 (30).
  25. Voto, Cristina. 2021. “Opacizzare il volto artificiale attraverso le arti digitali: errori, deformità, materia, intersoggettività.” Lexia 37–38: 285–302. https://doi.org/10.4399/978882553939414.
  26. Williams, Linda. 1989. Hard Core: Power, Pleasure and the “Frenzy of the Visible”. University of California.