Vocal and territorial behaviour of Puff-throated Babbler, a South-Asian duetting passerine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30456/avo.2024116Keywords:
male-female duet, communication, behaviour, songbirdsAbstract
Territorial songbirds use singing as an interactive social signal during territorial interactions. Considerable information has been accumulated about the communication of passerine birds in the context of territorial competition. Most of such data, however, were gathered in the northern temperate zone. Only a few studies have been conducted in the tropical zone. In this study, we describe for the first time the vocal and territorial behaviour of the Puff-throated Babbler Pellorneum ruficeps, a South Asian tropical resident bird. We recorded spontaneous vocalization simulated territorial intrusion by broadcasting different vocalizations at territories. We played back different types of conspecific vocalizations to territorial males: (1) male simple song, (2) male complex song, and (3) duet. Depending on context, there were three types of male vocalizations: simple song, complex song, and subsong. While singing spontaneously, males produced a simple song of 2–3 elements, repeated at a rate of 10–12 songs per minute. Males could respond to playback with complex songs, which are much more elaborate and longer (up to 5–10 seconds) vocalization emitted at a rate of approximately one song per minute. Subsong is the most commonly heard vocalization during playback-simulated territorial intrusion. Females could acoustically respond to playback along with the males, forming a duet. While duetting, females produced a sequence of identical broadband elements (trills) overlapping the male complex song. In response to simple song playback, males sang, approached the loudspeaker, and flew around it. Males reacted much more strongly when presented with the playback of complex songs. They sang more complex songs, performed more flyovers, and produced subsongs. Therefore, complex songs are an aggressive signal used in the context of territorial competition. We observed male-female duets in response to complex song playback only. Males sang more actively and performed more flyovers in response to duets than to complex songs. We thus assumed that the duet is a more aggressive signal than the complex song.
Downloads
References
Akçay Ç., Porsuk Y.K., Avşar A., Çabuk D. & Bilgin C.C. 2020. Song overlapping, noise, and territorial aggression in great tits. Behavioral Ecology 31(3): 807-814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/araa030
Anderson R.C., Nowicki S. & Searcy W.A. 2007. Soft song in song sparrows: response of males and females to an enigmatic signal. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 61: 1267-1274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0357-7
Araya‐Ajoy Y.G. & Dingemanse N.J. 2017. Repeatability, heritability, and age‐dependence of seasonal plasticity in aggressiveness in a wild passerine bird. Journal of Animal Ecology 86(2): 227-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12621
Ballentine B. 2009. The ability to perform physically challenging songs predicts age and size in male swamp sparrows, Melospiza georgiana. Animal Behaviour 77: 973-978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.12.027
Ballentine B., Hyman J. & Nowicki S. 2004. Vocal performance influences female response to male bird song: an experimental test. Behavioral Ecology 15(1): 163-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arg090
Balsby T.J. & Dabelsteen T. 2002. Female behaviour affects male courtship in whitethroats, Sylvia communis: an interactive experiment using visual and acoustic cues. Animal Behaviour 63(2): 251-257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2001.1920
Beebee H. 2002. Contingent laws rule: Reply to bird. Analysis 62(3): 252-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/62.3.252
Beecher M.D., Campbell S.E. & Nordby J.C. 2000. Territory tenure in song sparrows is related to song sharing with neighbours, but not to repertoire size. Animal Behaviour 59(1): 29-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1304
Botero C.A. & Vehrencamp S.L. 2007. Responses of male Tropical Mockingbirds (Mimus gilvus) to variation in within-song and between-song versatility. The Auk 124(1): 185-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/124.1.185
Briefer E., Osiejuk T.S., Rybak F. & Aubin T. 2010. Are bird song complexity and song sharing shaped by habitat structure? An information theory and statistical approach. Journal of Theoretical Biology 262(1): 151-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.09.020
Bremond J.C. 1968. Recherches sur la semantique et les elements vecteurs d’information dans les signaux acoustiques du rouge-gorge (Erithacus rubecula L.). Revue d'Ecologie, Terre et Vie 2: 109-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/revec.1968.4520
Catchpole C.K. & Slater P.J.B. 2003. Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations. Cambridge University Press.
Demko A.D. & Mennill D.J. 2018. Male and female signaling behaviour varies seasonally during territorial interactions in a tropical songbird. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 72: 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-018-2495-5
Diniz P., Rech G.S., Ribeiro P.H., Webster M.S. & Macedo R.H. 2020. Partners coordinate territorial defense against simulated intruders in a duetting ovenbird. Ecology and Evolution 10(1): 81-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5821
Diniz P., da Silva E.F., Webster M.S. & Macedo R.H. 2018. Duetting behaviour in a Neotropical ovenbird: sexual and seasonal variation and adaptive signaling functions. Journal of Avian Biology 49(4): 01637. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.01637
Farabaugh E. 1982. The ecological and social significance of duetting. Acoustic Communication in Birds 85-124
Fedy B.C. & Stutchbury B.J. 2005. Territory defence in tropical birds: are females as aggressive as males? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 58: 414-422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0928-4
Grafe T.U., Bitz J.H. & Wink M. 2004. Song repertoire and duetting behaviour of the tropical boubou, Laniarius aethiopicus. Animal Behaviour 68(1): 181-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.11.004
Hall M.L. 2000. The function of duetting in magpie-larks: conflict, cooperation, or commitment? Animal Behaviour 60(5): 667-677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1517
Hall M.L. 2004. A review of hypotheses for the functions of avian duetting. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 55: 415-430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-003-0741-x
Hall M.L. & Magrath R.D. 2007. Temporal coordination signals coalition quality. Current Biology 17(11): R406-R407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.04.022
Hall M.L. 2009. A review of vocal duetting in birds. Advances in the Study of Behaviour 40: 67-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(09)40003-2
Harcus J.L. 1977. The functions of vocal duetting in some African birds. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 43(1): 23-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1977.tb00057.x
Hau M. 2001. Timing of breeding in variable environments: tropical birds as model systems. Hormones and Behaviour 40(2): 281-290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/hbeh.2001.1673
Kramer H.G., Lemon R.E. & Morris M.J. 1985. Song switching and agonistic stimulation in the song sparrow (Melospiza melodia): five tests. Animal Behaviour 33: 135-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(85)80127-5
Kumar A. 2003. Acoustic communication in birds: Differences in songs and calls, their production and biological significance. Resonance 8: 44-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02837868
Liu P., Lloyd H., Lou Y. & Sun Y. 2023. Soft song provokes stronger aggressive responses than broadcast song in the Plain Laughingthrush (Pterorhinus davidi). Ibis 165(2): 561-570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.13141
Logue D.M. & Gammon D.E. 2004. Duet song and sex roles during territory defence in a tropical bird, the black-bellied wren, Thryothorus fasciatoventris. Animal Behaviour 68(4): 721-731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.10.026
MacArthur R.H., Diamond J.M. & Karr J.R. 1972. Density compensation in island faunas. Ecology 53(2): 330-342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1934090
MacNally R.C. & Lemon R.E. 1985. Repeat and serial singing modes in American redstarts (Setophaga ruticilla): a test of functional hypotheses. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 69(3): 191-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1985.tb00146.x
Marten K. & Marler P. 1977. Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization: I. Temperate habitats. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2: 271-290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299740
Marten K., Quine D. & Marler P. 1977. Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization: II. Tropical forest habitats. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2: 291-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299741
Martin T.E. 1996. Life history evolution in tropical and south temperate birds: what do we really know? Journal of Avian Biology 27(4): 263-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3677257
Mathevon N., Aubin T., Vielliard J., da Silva M.L., […] & Boscolo D. 2008. Singing in the rain forest: how a tropical bird song transfers information. PLoS One 3(2): e1580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001580
Mennill D.J. 2011. Individual distinctiveness in avian vocalizations and the spatial monitoring of behaviour. Ibis 153(2): 235-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2011.01119.x
Meshcheryagina S. & Opaev A. 2023. Structural-functional characteristics of two song types in Phylloscopus humei (Phylloscopidae). Nature Conservation Research 8(1): 96-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2023.009
Molles L.E., Vehrencamp S.L. 2001. Neighbour recognition by resident males in the banded wren, Thryothorus pleurostictus, a tropical songbird with high song type sharing. Animal Behaviour 61(1): 119-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1561
Moran I.G., Doucet S.M., Newman A.E., Ryan Norris D. & Mennill D.J. 2018. Quiet violence: Savannah Sparrows respond to playback‐simulated rivals using low‐amplitude songs as aggressive signals. Ethology 124(10): 724-732. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12805
Morton E.S. 1975. Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. The American Naturalist 109(965): 17-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/282971
Opaev A., Gogoleva S., Palko I. & Rozhnov V. 2021. Annual acoustic dynamics are associated with seasonality in a monsoon tropical forest in South Vietnam. Ecological Indicators 122: 107269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107269
Opaev A., Kolesnikova Y., Liu M. & Kang Z. 2019. Singing of Claudia’s Leaf-warbler (Phylloscopus claudiae) in aggressive contexts: role of song rate, song type diversity and song type transitional pattern. Journal of Ornithology 160: 297-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-018-1614-4
Payne R.B. & Skinner N.J. 1970. Temporal patterns of duetting in African barbets. Ibis 112(2): 173-183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1970.tb00091.x
Payne R.B. 1971. Duetting and chorus singing in African birds. Ostrich 42(S1): 125-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00306525.1971.9633401
Petrusková T., Kinštová A., Pišvejcová I., Mula Laguna J., […] Petrusek A. 2014. Variation in trill characteristics in tree pipit songs: different trills for different use? Ethology 120(6): 586-597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12231
R Development Core Team 2020. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. Ramellini, S. 2017. L’usignolo del Giappone Leiothrix lutea nel Lazio: aggiornamento della distribuzione ed 487 annotazioni eco-etologiche. Alula 24(1-2): 95-108.
Ręk P. & Magrath R.D. 2020. Visual displays enhance vocal duet production and the perception of coordination despite spatial separation of partners. Animal Behaviour 168: 231-241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.08.002
Rivera-Cáceres K.D. & Templeton C.N. 2019. A duetting perspective on avian song learning. Behavioural processes 163: 71-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2017.12.007
Robinson A. 1949. The biological significance of bird song in Australia. Emu-Austral Ornithology 48(4): 291-315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/MU948291
Rogers A.C., Mulder R.A. & Langmore N.E. 2006. Duet duels: sex differences in song matching in duetting eastern whipbirds. Animal Behaviour 72(1): 53-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.08.019
Searcy W.A. & Beecher M.D. 2009. Song as an aggressive signal in songbirds. Animal Behaviour 78: 1281-1292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.08.011
Searcy W.A., Anderson R.C. & Nowicki S. 2006. Bird song as a signal of aggressive intent. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 60: 234-241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0161-9
Searcy W.A., Nowicki S. & Hogan C. 2000. Song type variants and aggressive context. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 48: 358-363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650000254
Spector D.A. 1992. Wood-warbler song systems: a review of paruline singing behaviours. Current Ornithology 199-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9921-7_6
Stutchbury B.J. & Morton E.S. 2008. Recent advances in the behavioural ecology of tropical birds. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 120(1): 26-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1676/07-018.1
Shonfield J., Taylor R.W., Boutin S., Humphries M.M. & McAdam A.G. 2012. Territorial defence behaviour in red squirrels is influenced by local density. Behaviour 149(3/4): 369-390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853912X637842
Templeton C.N., Akçay Ç., Campbell S.E. & Beecher M.D. 2012. Soft song is a reliable signal of aggressive intent in song sparrows. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 66: 1503-1509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-012-1405-5
Thinh, V.T., Doherty Jr, P.F., Bui, T.H. & Huyvaert, K.P. 2012. Road crossing by birds in a tropical forest in northern Vietnam. The Condor 114(3): 639-644. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2012.100199
Tingay S. 1974. Antiphonal song of the magpie lark. Emu-Austral Ornithology 74(1): 11-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/MU974011
Todt D. & Naguib M. 2000. Vocal interactions in birds: the use of song as a model in communication. Advances in the Study of Behaviour 29: 247-296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60107-2
Vaytina T.M. & Shitikov D.A. 2019. Age-related changes in song repertoire size and song type sharing in the Whinchat Saxicola rubetra. Bioacoustics 28(2): 140-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2017.1408495
Whistler H. 1949. Popular handbook of Indian birds. Cosmo publications.
Wickler W. 1976. Duetting songs in birds: biological significance of stationary and non-stationary processes. Journal of Theoretical Biology 60(2): 493-497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(76)90078-3
Wickler W. & Seibt U. 1982. Song splitting in the evolution of dueting. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 59(2): 127-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1982.tb00334.x
Wingfield J.C., Hahn T.P., Levin R. & Honey P. 1992. Environmental predictability and control of gonadal cycles in birds. Journal of Experimental Zoology 261(2): 214-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402610212
Zsebők S., Herczeg G., Laczi M., Nagy G., [...] & Garamszegi L.Z. 2021. Sequential organization of birdsong: relationships with individual quality and fitness. Behavioural Ecology 32(1): 82-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/araa104
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
