Beauty: a bioform of storytelling?
According to twentieth-century experimental psychology, beauty consisted mainly in the recognition of a host of prototypical forms, so perceiving something average and generic aroused a sense of reassuring familiarity. The recent discovery of the principles of Darwinism, above all by neuro-scientists and bio-neurologists, on the other hand, suggested the opposite, namely that beauty is a form of evolutionary fitness: a sort of storytelling used firstly in the animal kingdom, then by mankind up to the Late Stone Age, in which males tried to persuade a female to mate. The recent theory of the so-called ‘period-eye’ has shown the constant influence of our surroundings on our perception of what is beautiful, confirming the neo-Darwin theories, in the light of historical and social mechanisms, not only bio-evolutionary.
Berlyne, Daniel E. Conflict, Arousal and Curiosity. McGraw-Hill, 1960.
Berridge, Kent and Morten L. Kringelbach. “Neuro-science of affect: brain mechanisms of pleasure and displeasure.” Current Opinion in Neuro-biology, vol. 23, no. 3, 2013, pp. 294-303.
Brown, Steven, Xiaoqing Gao, Loren Tisdelle, Simon Eickhoff, and Mario Liotti. “Naturalizing aesthetics: brain areas for aesthetic appraisal across sensory modalities.” Neuro-image, vol. 58, no. 1, 2011, pp. 250-58.
Brachmann, Anselm and Christoph Redies. “Computational and Experimental Approaches to Visual Aesthetics” Frontiers in computational neuroscience, vol. 11, 2017, art. 102.
Conrieri Davide. “Lettura del ‘Cuorvo’ (IV, 9).” Giovan Battista Basile e l’invenzione della fiaba, a cura di Michelangelo Picone, Longo, 2004, pp. 161-79.
Darwin, Charles. “Sexual Selection in Relation to Monkeys.” The Collected Papers of Charles Darwin, edited by Paul H. Barrett, Chicago UP, 1977.
Di Dio, Cinzia, Emiliano Macaluso and Giacomo Rizzolatti. “The Golden Beauty: Brain Responses to Classical and Renaissance Sculptures.” PLoS ONE, vol. 2, no. 11, 2007, art. e1201.
Hayn-Leichsenring, Gregor U., Thomas Lehmann and Christoph Redies. “Subjective Ratings of Beauty and Aesthetics: Correlations With Statistical Image Properties in Western Oil Paintings”. i-Perception, vol. 8, no. 3, 2017, art. 2041669517715474.
Hekkert, Paul and Piet C.W. van Wieringen. “Complexity and prototypicality as determinants of the appraisal of cubist paintings.” British Journal of Psychology, vol. 81, no. 4, 1990, pp. 483-95.
Hogan, Paul C. “Literary Aesthetics: Beauty, the Brain and Mrs.Dalloway.” Literature, Neurology and Neuro-science: Historical and Literary Connections, edited by Anne Stiles, Stanley Finger and Francois Boller, Elsevier, 2013, pp. 319-36.
Kirk, Ulrich et al. “Modulation of aesthetic value by semantic context: An fMRI study.” NeuroImage, vol. 44, 2009, pp. 1125-32.
Leahy, Helen R. “Incorporating Period Eye.” The Senses & Society, vol. 9, no. 3, 2015, pp. 284-95.
Leder, Helmut, Benno Belke, Andries Oeberst and Dorothee Augustin. “A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments.” British Journal of Psychology, vol. 95, 2004, pp. 489-508.
Menninghaus, Winfried. Das Versprechen der Schönheit. Suhrkamp, 2003.
---. Wozu Kunst? Ästhetik nach Darwin. Suhrkamp, 2011.
Mithen, Steven. The Prehistory of Mind. A Search for the Origins of Art, Religion, and Science. Phoenix, 1996.
Mithen, Steven. The Singing Neanderthals. The Origins of Music, Language, Mind, and Body. Harvard UP, 2007.
Onians, John. European Art. Neuro-arthistory. Yale UP, 2016.
Palmer, Stephen E., Schloss, Karen B. and Jonathan S. Gardner. “Hidden Knowledge in Aesthetic Judgements.” Aesthetic Science. Connecting minds, brains and experience, edited by Arthur P. Shimamura and Stephen Palmer, Oxford UP, 2012, pp. 189-222.
Ramachandran, Vilayanur S. The Tell-Tale Brain. W. W. Norton & Company, 2011.
Redies, Christoph. “Combining universal beauty and cultural context in a unifying model of visual aesthetic experience.” Frontiers in human neuroscience, vol. 9, 2015, art. 218.
Steen, Francis. “A Cognitive Account of Aesthetics. The Artful Mind”. Cognitive Science and the Riddle of Creativity, edited by Mark Turner, Oxford UP, 2006, pp. 57-71.
Zahavi, Amotz e Avishag Zahavi. The Handicap Principle: A Missing Piece of Darwin’s Puzzle. Oxford UP, 1997.
Zeki, Semir and Tomohiro Ishizu. “Toward a Brain-Based Theory of Beauty.” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 7, 2011, pp. 1-10.