«We Should Never Write Without Feelings». Studi su William T. Vollmann – A cura di Giuseppe Carrara e Marco Malvestio

The Sentence Is Most Important: Styles of Engagement in William T. Vollmann’s Fictions

Christopher K. Coffman

Abstract


William T. Vollmann frequently asserts that his ideal reader will appreciate the functionality and beauty of his sentences. This article begins by taking such claims seriously, and draws on both literary and rhetorical stylistics to explore some of the many ways that his texts answer to his intention to find “the right sentence for the right job.” In particular, this article argues that Vollmann’s stylistic decisions are most notable when they most directly satisfy his effort to produce texts that foster empathetic knowledge, serve truth, resist abusive power, and encourage charitable action. Extended close analyses of passages from an early and from a mid-career text (The Rainbow Storiesand Europe Central) illustrate Vollmann’s consistency across two decades of his career regarding choices in the areas of figuration (including schemes and tropes of comparison, repetition, balance, naming, and amplification), grammar, deixis, allusion, and other compositional strategies. Particular attention is paid to passages that display the stylistic mechanisms underlying Vollmann’s negotiation of his texts’ moral qualities, including both the moral content of the worlds represented in the texts, and the moral responsibility the texts bear with regard to their audience. The results of my analyses demonstrate that Vollmann typically prioritizes openness, critique, and dialogue not only in terms of incident and character, but also on the scale of the phrase, clause, and sentence. Ultimately, this article shows how Vollmann’s sentences serve his declared intentions and allow readers to recognize compatibilities between Vollmann’s works and the characteristic features of post-postmodernist writing in general.

Parole chiave

William T. Vollmann; Style; Contemporary American fiction

Full Text

PDF (English)


DOI: https://doi.org/10.13130/2037-2426/11919

NBN: http://nbn.depositolegale.it/urn%3Anbn%3Ait%3Aunimi-25139

Riferimenti bibliografici


Bissell, Tom. “You Are Now Entering the Demented Kingdom of William T. Voll-mann.” The New Republic, 23 July 2014, https://newrepublic.com/article/118748/william-t-vollmanns-dangerously-uncorrupted-literary-mind.

Bucher, Vincent. “Putting Historical Inquiry to the Test.” Under Fire; William T. Vollmann, The Rifles: A Critical Study, edited by Françoise Palleau-Papin, Peter Lang, 2016, pp. 55–82.

Chapuis, Sophie. “Narrative Voices.” Under Fire; William T. Vollmann, The Rifles: A Critical Study, edited by Françoise Palleau-Papin, Peter Lang, 2016, pp. 101–19.

Chilton, Paul. Analyzing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. Routledge, 2004.

Coffman, Christopher K. “Introduction: Lonely Atoms.” William T. Vollmann: A Critical Companion, edited by Christopher K. Coffman and Daniel Lukes, U of Delaware P, 2015, pp. 1–21.

Fahnestock, Jeanne. Rhetorical Style: The Uses of Language in Persuasion. Oxford UP, 2011.

Franzen, Jonathan. The End of the End of the Earth: Essays. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2018.

---. “A Friendship.” William T. Vollmann: A Critical Companion, edited by Christopher K. Coffman and Daniel Lukes, U of Delaware P, 2015, pp. 281–84.

Genette, Gérard. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method, translated by Jane Lewin, Cornell UP, 1980.

Gibbons, Alison, and Sara Whitely. Contemporary Stylistics: Language, Cognition, Interpretation. Edinburgh UP, 2018.

Kelly, Adam Maxwell. “David Foster Wallace and the New Sincerity in American Fic-tion.” Consider David Foster Wallace: Critical Essays, edited by David Hering, Sideshow Media, 2010, pp. 131–46.

Lanone, Catherine. “From Franklin’s Narrative to Vollmann’s EcoGothic Metafiction.” Under Fire; William T. Vollmann, The Rifles: A Critical Study, edited by Françoise Pal-leau-Papin, Peter Lang, 2016, pp. 25–53.

Laurencin, Madeleine. “Female Characters: Between Role and Representation.” Under Fire; William T. Vollmann, The Rifles: A Critical Study, edited by Françoise Palleau-Papin, Peter Lang, 2016, pp. 121¬–43.

Lukes, Daniel. “‘Strange Hungers’: William T. Vollmann’s Literary Performances of Ab-ject Masculinity.” William T. Vollmann: A Critical Companion, edited by Christopher K. Coffman and Daniel Lukes, U of Delaware P, 2015, pp. 247–79.

McCaffery, Larry. “The Chrysanthemum and the Flame Thrower.” Preface. William T. Vollmann: A Critical Companion, edited by Christopher K. Coffman and Daniel Lukes, U of Delaware P, 2015, pp. xiii–xvi.

Palleau-Papin, Françoise. “Composition as Infinity.” Under Fire; William T. Vollmann, The Rifles: A Critical Study, edited by Françoise Palleau-Papin, Peter Lang, 2016, pp. 81–100.

---. “Over/exposure in The Atlas by William T. Vollmann.” Sillages critiques, vol. 17, 2014, http://journals.openedition.org/sillagescritiques/3731.

Phelan, James. “Rhetoric, Ethics, and Narrative Communication; or, from Story and Discourse to Authors, Resources, and Audiences.” Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal, vol. 94, nos. 1–2, 2011, pp. 55–75.

---. “Voice, Tone, and the Rhetoric of Narrative Communication.” Language and Litera-ture, vol. 23, no. 1, 2014, pp. 49–60.

Pignagnoli, Virginia. “Narrative Theory and the Brief and Wondrous Life of Post-Postmodern Fiction.” Poetics Today, vol. 39, no. 1, 2018, pp. 183–99.

Poirier, Richard. “Rocket Power.” Review of Gravity’s Rainbow, by Thomas Pynchon. Pyn-chon: A Collection of Critical Essays, edited by Edward Mendelson, Prentice-Hall, 1978, pp. 167–78.

Pynchon, Thomas. Gravity’s Rainbow. Penguin, 1973.

---. V. Bantam, 1963.

Savvas, Theophilus, and Christopher K. Coffman. “Introduction: American Literature after Postmodernism.” Textual Practice, vol. 33, no. 2, 2019, pp. 195–212.

Qian, Cheng. A Study of William Vollmann: Transgression in the Postmodern Context. Xiamen UP, 2012.

Rabinowitz, Peter J. “The Rhetoric of Reference; or, Shostakovich’s Ghost Quartet.” Narrative, vol. 15, no. 2, 2007, pp. 239–56.

Turner, Rob. Counterfeit Culture: Truth and Authenticity in the American Prose Epic since 1960. Cambridge UP, 2019.

Vollmann, William T. “American Writing Today: Diagnosis of a Disease.” Expelled from Eden: A William T. Vollmann Reader, edited by Larry McCaffery and Michael Hem-mingson. Thunder’s Mouth P, 2004, pp. 329-32.

---. Europe Central. Penguin, 2005.

---. “An Interview with William T. Vollmann,” by Larry McCaffery. The Review of Contem-porary Fiction, vol. 13, no. 2, 1993, pp. 9–38.

---. The Rainbow Stories. Penguin, 1989.

---. Rising Up and Rising Down. McSweeney’s, 2003. 7 vols.

---. “Why Are You Poor? William T. Vollmann in conversation with Karl Taro Green-feld.” New York Public Library, 2 March 2007, https://www.nypl.org/audiovideo/why-are-you-poor-william-t-vollmann-conversation-karl-taro-greenfeld.

---. “The Write Stuff ALT-X Interview,” by Alexander Laurence. William T. Vollmann: A Critical Study and Seven Interviews, by Michael Hemmingson, McFarland, 2009, pp. 114–23.

---. You Bright and Risen Angels: A Cartoon. Penguin, 1987.

Wallace, David Foster. “E Unibus Pluram: Television and U.S. Fiction.” Review of Contem-porary Fiction, vol. 13, no. 2, 1993, pp. 151–94.


Metriche dell'articolo

Caricamento metriche ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refback

  • Non ci sono refbacks, per ora.







ISSN 2037-2426

Enthymema è una rivista italiana di Classe A per l'area 10, indicizzata in Scopus e Web of Science.

Creative Commons License

Except where otherwise noted, the content of this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License.

Logo by Mauro Sullam