Averintsev and the Formalist Tradition: Remarks on the Concept of “Literary Evolution”

Autori

  • Alexander Markov RSUH

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54103/2037-2426/15219

Parole chiave:

Russian Formalism, Averintsev, Tynyanov, Plato, Rhetorics

Abstract

Since the concept of “literary evolution” proposed by Yuri Tynyanov could not be applied to the late Soviet official literature, Sergei Averintsev using this concept examined the relationship between philosophy, sophistry, rhetorics and everyday consciousness in classical Greece. Tynyanov’s theory of “parallel series” turned out to be productive for the reconstruction of the tasks of the ancient philosopher and for the interpretation of Plato’s dialogues. According to Averintsev, Plato acted within the sophistic field, creating irreducible terminology and untranslatable phrases as a moment of the entire further evolution of Western literature. Consideration of Russian formalism as the context of Averintsev’s thought proves his contribution to the discussion of Platonism as a tool for posing philosophical problems and of the perspective of philosophy in the postcolonial discussion.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Agehananda Bharati, Swami. “Indian Expatriates in North America and neo-Hindu Movements.” The Communication of Ideas, edited by Vinayshil Gautam and J. S. Yadava, Concept Publishing Company, 1980, pp. 245-56.

Averintsev, Sergey S, ed. Novoe v sovremennoy klassicheskoy filologii [New in contemporary classical philology]. Nauka Publishers, 1979.

Averintsev, Sergey S. “Lichnost’ i talant uchenogo.” [Person and talent of the researcher] Literaturnoe obozrenie [The Literary Review], no. 10, 1976, pp. 58-61.

–––. Poetika rannevizantiyskoy literatury [Poetics of Early Byzantine literature]. Nauka Publishers, 1977.

–––. Ritorika i istoki evropeyskoy literaturnoy traditsii [Rhetoric and origins of the European literary tradition]. Languages of Russian Culture Publishers, 1996.

Bocharov, Sergey G. “Averintsev v nashey istorii.” [Averintsev in our history]. Voprosy literatury, 2004, no. 6, pp. 19-24.

Balakshina, Julia V. “Germenevtika S. S. Averintseva: istoki, printsipy, svoeobrazie.” [Hermeneutics of Sergey Averintsev: sources, work and identity]. Vestnik Svyato-Filaretovskogo instituta [SFI Bulletin], no. 32, 2019, pp. 110-27.

Cassin, Barbara, et al., eds. Dictionary of untranslatables: A philosophical lexicon. Princeton UP, 2014.

Cassin, Barbara. Sophistical practice: Toward a consistent relativism. Fordham UP, 2014.

Groys, Boris. “Istoki i smysl russkogo strukturalizma.” [Sources and sense of the Russian structuralism]. 37 [Samizdat Journal], no. 21, 1980, pp. 4-53.

Krivulin, Viktor B. “Zametki na polyakh odnoy nesvoevremennoy knigi.” [Notes on an untimed book: a review of Tynyanov’s collection of articles]. 37 [Samizdat Journal], no. 10, 1977, pp. 227-57.

Markov, Alexander. “Meanings of Culture and Books. From “Marriage of Convenience” to Signs of “First Love”.” Literatūra, 2021, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 204-25.

–––. “Overcoming the Genre System of the “Thick Journal” as a Socio-political Construction: Referring to One Publication by S. Averintsev.” Russian Sociological Review, 2020, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 321-50.

Mikhailov, Alexander V. Obratnyy perevod. Russkaya i zapadno-evropeyskaya kul’tura: problemy vzaimosvyazey [Reverse translation. Russian and Western European Culture: Problems of Relationships]. Languages of Russian Culture Publishers, 2000.

Rabinovich, Elena G. Vergiliy, Klavdian, Petrarka. Izbrannye geksametry [Virgil, Claudian, Petrarch. Selected hexameters with introductory notes]. Carte Blanche, 1993.

Sedakova, Olga A. “Discourse on method.” Freedom to believe: philosophical and cultural essays. Bucknell UP, 2010.

Tynyanov, Yuri N. “On literary evolution.” Permanent Evolution: Selected Essays on Literature, Theory and Film. Academic Studies Press, 2019, pp. 267-83.

–––. Poetika. Istoriya literatury. Kino [Poetics. History of Literature. Cinema]. Nauka, 1977.

##submission.downloads##

Pubblicato

2022-01-01

Come citare

Markov, A. (2022). Averintsev and the Formalist Tradition: Remarks on the Concept of “Literary Evolution”. ENTHYMEMA, (28), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.54103/2037-2426/15219

Fascicolo

Sezione

Saggi