Beyond the Moral of the Digital Story. Belén Gache’s Cyberliterature and the Values of Technological Art

Autori

  • Camille Dasseleer

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54103/2037-2426/19555

Parole chiave:

Cyberliterature, Digital arts, Axiological judgements, Belén Gache, Compatibility

Abstract

In the face of the theories that dismiss digital arts for being facilitated by the capitalist system, this paper argues that a critical awareness on the dangers of new technologies does not necessarily lead to the condemnation of technological arts. Indeed, the evidence suggests that digital technologies are an excellent medium through which literature can voice a nuanced and critical consideration about the world in which it appears. The analysis focuses on Spanish-Argentinian writer Belén Gache’s transmedia project Kublai Moon (2013-2019) in order to demonstrate that hypothesis. Firstly, it is shown that the novel reflects on the compatibility between humans and machine, in its content as well as in its forms. Secondly, it is contended that the axiological judgments on literature must be based on updated criteria when it comes to evaluating digital works.

Riferimenti bibliografici

de Boutiny, Lucie, Non (Multimedia novel published). Synesthésie (online journal), 1997-2001.

Fischer-Lichte, Erika, et al. The Routledge Introduction to Theatre and Performance Studies. Routledge, 2014.

Gache, Belén. Kublai Moon. Sociedad Lunar Ediciones, 2017.

—. Kublai Moon Project. http://belengache.net/kublaimoon/.

—. Mundos En Colisión. Second Life Reading. 2016, https://vimeo.com/belengache.

—. Los Pájaros Del Espacio Exterior. Second Life Reading. 2016, https://vimeo.com/belengache.

Grigar, Dene. “Electronic Literature: Where is it?” Electronic Book Review, 28 Dec. 2008.

Hayles, Katherine. Electronic Literature: New Horizons for the Literary. U of Notre Dame P, 2008.

Jimenez, Marc. “Le défi esthétique de l’art technologique”. Le Portique, no. 3, Jan. 1999.

Kozak, Claudia. “Literatura expandida en el dominio digital”. El Taco en la Brea, no. 6, Dec. 2017, pp. 220–45.

Ledesma, Germán. El susurro de los mercados. Capitalismo financiero y literatura digital. UNR Editora, 2022.

Montfort, Nick, and William Gillespie, The Ed Report (hypertext novel) [broken link], 2000.

O’Sullivan, James. Towards a Digital Poetics. Electronic Literature and Literary Games. Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.

Piraud, Mischa-S. “Le piège de la créativité : examen sémantique et pragmatique du capitalisme créatif.” Interventions économiques, no. 57, 2017.

Rasmussen, Eric Dean. Online note on The Ed Report, ELMCIP, https://elmcip.net/creative-work/ed-report, 2017.

Rockhill, Gabriel. Radical History and the Politics of Art: Columbia UP, 2014.

Saum Pascal, Alex, SelfiePoetry. Women&Capitalism (digital poetic work), http://www.alexsaum.com/selfiepoetry-vol2_womencapitalism/, 2016.

Sibilia, Paula. Cuerpxs, Tecnologías y Subjetividades. Online conference for NeoValpo, 30 Nov. 2021, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXJX2AAEocc&ab_channel=NeoValpo.

—. El hombre postorgánico: Cuerpo, subjetividad y tecnologías digitales. Fondo de Cultura Econo-mica, 2012.

—. La Intimidad Como Espectáculo. Fondo de cultura económica Buenos Aires, 2008.

—. ¿Redes o Paredes?: La Escuela En Tiempos de Dispersión. Tinta fresca, 2012.

Stecker, Robert. Artworks: Definition, Meaning, Value. Pennsylvania State UP, 1997.

Taylor, Claire. Electronic Literature in Latin America: From Text to Hypertext. Springer International Publishing, 2019.

Thornton, Pip, {poem}.py, (digital poetic work), https://pipthornton.com/2016/06/12/ poem-py-a-critique-of-linguistic-capitalism/, 2016.

Tisselli, Eugenio, El 27/The 27 (digital poetic work), http://motorhueso.net/27/, 2013.

Tisselli, Eugenio, and Rui Torres. “In Defense of the Difficult.” Electronic Book Review, 2020.

Virilio, Paul. La bombe informatique. Galilée, 1998.

Pubblicato

02-01-2023

Come citare

Dasseleer, C. (2023). Beyond the Moral of the Digital Story. Belén Gache’s Cyberliterature and the Values of Technological Art. ENTHYMEMA, (30), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.54103/2037-2426/19555