Interactivist Refutation of Radical Epistemic Skepticism Characteristic of Postmodern Literary Studies and Fiction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54103/2037-2426/19781Keywords:
Postmodern skepticism, Interactivism, Cognition, TruthAbstract
Postmodern fiction and literary theory have endorsed radical skepticism about knowledge, which was partly conditioned by philosophers’ inability to provide a viable epistemology that would resolve the radical skeptical problems. Most recent developments in both fiction and theory have largely ignored the apparently still unresolved issue and have instead embraced the position of active commitment that presupposes that knowledge is in fact possible. In this text, we address this apparent oversight and present an interactivist ontology of the mind and culture that explains how we can acquire knowledge about the world, and why the postmodern radical skepticism is ungrounded. We argue that once the interactivist theory of cognition as well as ontology of the mind and culture are assumed, the skeptical problems that troubled postmodern thought become non-problems and further pursuit of epistemically evaluable theory of culture (fiction included) gains solid theoretical grounds.
References
Allen, Jedediah W, and Mark H. Bickhard. “Stepping off the Pendulum: Why Only an Ac-tion-Based Approach Can Transcend the Nativist–Empiricist Debate.” Cognitive Development, vol. 28, no. 2, 2013, pp. 96–133.
Alon, Uri, Mike G. Surette, Naama Barkai and S. Leibler. “Robustness in Bacterial Chemo-taxis.” Nature, vol. 397, no. 6715, 1999, pp. 168–71.
Barry, Peter. Beginning Theory: An Introduction to Literary and Cultural Theory. [1995], Manchester University Press, 2017.
Bickhard, Mark H. “Autonomy, Function, and Representation.” Communication and Cognition-Artificial Intelligence, vol. 17, no. 3-4, 2000, pp. 11–131.
Bickhard, Mark H. Cognition, Convention, and Communication. Praeger, 1980.
Bickhard, Mark H. “Consciousness and Reflective Consciousness.” Philosophical Psychology, vol. 18, no. 2, 2005, pp. 205–18.
Bickhard, Mark H. “Dynamics Is Not Enough: An Interactivist Perspective.” Human Development, 2019, pp. 1–18.
Bickhard, Mark H. “The Interactivist Model.” Synthese, vol. 166, no. 3, 2009, pp. 547–91.
Bickhard, Mark H. “Language as an Interaction System.” New Ideas in Psychology, vol. 25, no. 2, 2007, pp. 171–87.
Bickhard, Mark H. “Levels of Representationality.” Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, vol. 10, no. 2, 1998, pp. 179–215.
Bickhard, Mark H. “A Model of Developmental and Psychological Processes.” Genetic Psychology Mono-graphs, 1980, pp. 61–116.
Bickhard, Mark H. “A Pre-Logical Model of Rationality.” Epistemological Foundations of Mathematical Experience, edited by Les Steffe, 1991, pp. 68–77.
Bickhard, Mark H. “Representational Content in Humans and Machines.” Journal of Experimental & Theoret-ical Artificial Intelligence, vol. 5, no. 4, 1993, pp. 285–333.
Bickhard, Mark H. “Social Ontology as Convention.” Topoi, vol. 27, no. 1-2, 2008, pp. 139–49.
Bickhard, Mark H. “The Social Ontology of Persons.” Social Interaction and the Development of Knowledge, edited by Jeremy I. M. Carpendale and Ulrich Muller, Psychology Press, 2013.
Bickhard, Mark H. “The Social-Interactive Ontology of Language.” Ecological Psychology, vol. 27, no. 3, 2015, pp. 265–77.
Bickhard, Mark H. “Toward a Model of Functional Brain Processes I: Central Nervous System Functional Micro-Architecture.” Axiomathes, vol. 25, no. 3, 2015, pp. 217–38.
Bickhard, Mark H. “Toward a Model of Functional Brain Processes II: Central Nervous System Functional Macro-Architecture.” Axiomathes, vol. 25, no. 4, 2015, pp. 377–407.
Bickhard, Mark H. “Inter- and En-activism: Some Thoughts and Comparisons.” New Ideas in Psychology, vol. 41, 2016, pp. 23–32.
Bickhard, Mark H. The Whole Person: Toward a Naturalism of Persons: Contributions to an Ontological Psychology. (in preparation)
Bickhard, Mark H., and Campbell, R. L. “Topologies of Learning and Development” New Ideas in Psychology, vol. 14, no. 2, 1996, pp. 111–56.
Bickhard, Mark H., and L. Terveen. Foundational Issues in Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science: Impasse and Solution. Elsevier, 1995.
Brooks, Rodney A. “Intelligence without representation.” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 47, no. 1-3, 1991, pp. 139–59.
Calamari, Martin. “The Metaphysical Challenge of Loop Quantum Gravity.” Studies in His-tory and Philosophy of Science, vol. 86, 2021, pp. 68–83.
Campbell, Donald T. “Evolutionary Epistemology.” The Philosophy of Karl Popper, edited by Paul Arthur Schilpp, Open Court, 1974, pp. 413–63.
Campbell, Richard J. The Concept of Truth. Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
Campbell, Richard J. The Metaphysics of Emergence. Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
Campbell, Robert L., and Mark H. Bickhard. Knowing Levels and Developmental Stages. S. Karger, 1986.
Chemero, Anthony P. Radical Embodied Cognitive Science. MIT Press, 2009.
Di Paolo, Ezequiel A. “Autopoiesis, Adaptivity, Teleology, Agency.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, vol. 4, no. 4, 2005, pp. 429–52.
Fodor, Jerry A. The Language of Thought. Crowell, 1975.
Fodor, Jerry A. “The Present Status of the Innateness Controversy.” Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science, Harvester, 1981, pp. 257–316.
Ford, Kenneth M., and Zenon W. Pylyshyn, eds. The Robot's Dilemma Revisited: The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence. Ablex, 1996.
Gregoromichelaki, Eleni, and Ruth Kempson. “Procedural Syntax.” Relevance, Pragmatics and Interpretation, edited by Kate Scott, Billy Clark, and Robyn Carston, Cambridge UP, 2019, pp. 187–202.
Gutowski, Piotr. „Prawda – rzeczywistość – sztuka.” Prawda natury, prawda sztuki: studia nad znaczeniem reprezentacji natury, edited by Ryszard Kasperowicz and Elżbieta Wolicka, Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL, 2002, pp. 191–206.
Hawthorn, Jeremy. Studying the Novel. Bloomsbury, 2017.
Huber, Irmtraud, and Wolfgang Funk. “Reconstructing Depth: Authentic Fiction and Responsibility” Metamodernism: Historicity, Affect, and Depth after Postmodernism, edited by Rob-in van den Akker, Alison Gibbons and Timotheus Vermeulen, Rowman & Littlefield, 2017, pp. 151–65.
Hutcheon, Linda. A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory, Fiction. Routledge, 1988.
Hutto, Daniel D. “Radically Enactive Cognition in Our Grasp.” The Hand, an Organ of the Mind, edited by Zdravko Radman, The MIT Press, 2013, pp. 227–52.
Hutto, Daniel D. “REC: Revolution Effected by Clarification.” Topoi, vol. 36, no. 3, 2017, pp. 377–91.
Hutto, Daniel D., and Erik Myin. Evolving Enactivism: Basic Minds Meet Content. MIT Press, 2017.
Hutto, Daniel D., and Erik Myin. Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds Without Content. MIT Press, 2013.
Jaeger, Heinrich M. and Andrea J. Liu. “Far-From-Equilibrium Physics: An Overview.” arXiv [2010], https://arxiv.org/abs/1009.4874. Accessed 10 Dec. 2021.
Kempson, Ruth, Ronnie Cann, Eleni Gregoromichelaki and Stergios Chatzikyriakidis. “Action-Based Grammar.” Theoretical Linguistics, vol. 43, no, 1-2, 2017, pp. 141–67.
Kempson, Ruth, Ronnie Cann, Eleni Gregoromichelaki and Stergios Chatzikyriakidis. “Language as Mechanisms for Interaction.” Theoretical Linguistics, vol. 42, no. 3–4, 2016, pp. 203–276.
Lewis, David K. Convention: A Philosophical Study. [1969], Blackwell, 2002.
Maziarczyk, Grzegorz. The Novel as Book: Textual Materiality in Contemporary Fiction in English. Wydawnictwo KUL, 2013.
McHale, Brian. Postmodernist Fiction. Methuen, 1987.
Mead, George H. Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. University of Chicago Press, 1934.
Miłkowski, Marcin. “Correspondence Theory of Semantic Information.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 2021, doi:10.1086/714804. Preprint.
Mirski, Robert, and Arkadiusz Gut. “Action-Based Versus Cognitivist Perspectives on So-cio-Cognitive Development: Culture, Language and Social Experience Within the Two Paradigms.” Synthese, vol. 197, 2020, pp. 5511–37.
Mirski, Robert, and Mark H. Bickhard. “Conventional Minds: An Interactivist Perspective on Social Cognition and Its Enculturation.” New Ideas in Psychology, vol. 62, 2021, p. 100856.
O’Neill, Patrick. Fictions of Discourse: Reading Narrative Theory. University of Toronto Press, 1994.
O’Regan, J. Kevin, and Alva Noë. “A Sensorimotor Account of Vision and Visual Con-sciousness.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences vol. 24, no. 5, 2001, pp. 939–73.
Piaget, Jean. Studies in Reflecting Abstraction. Translated by Robert L. Campbell, Norton, 2015.
Piattelli-Palmarini, Massimo (ed.). Language and Learning: The Debate Between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. Harvard University Press, 1980.
Plantinga, Alvin. Warrant and Proper Function. Oxford UP, 1993.
Plantinga, Alvin. Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism. Oxford UP, 2011.
Ramsey, William. “Must Cognition Be Representational?” Synthese, vol. 194, no. 11, 2017, pp. 4197–214.
Rączaszek-Leonardi, Joanna, Iris Nomikou, Katharina J. Rohlfing and Terrence W. Dea-con. “Language Development From an Ecological Perspective: Ecologically Valid Ways to Abstract Symbols.” Ecological Psychology vol. 30, no. 1, 2018, pp. 39–73.
Rimmon-Kenan, Shlomith. A Glance Beyond Doubt: Narration, Representation, Subjectivity. Ohio State University Press, 1996.
Rimmon-Kenan, Shlomith. Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics. Routledge, 2002.
Rowlands, Mark. “Arguing about Representation.” Synthese, vol. 194, no.11 (2017), pp. 4215–32.
Schelling, Thomas C. Strategy of Conflict. [1963], Harvard UP, 1997.
Searle, John R. “Minds, Brains, and Programs.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 3, no. 3, 1980, pp. 417–24.
Seibt, Johanna. “Existence in Time: From Substance to Process.” Perspectives on Time, edited by Jan Faye, Uwe Scheffler and Max Urchs, Springer, 2011, pp. 143–82.
Seibt, Johanna. “The Myth of Substance and the Fallacy of Misplaced Concreteness.” Acta Analytica, 1996.
Shea, Nicholas. Representation in Cognitive Science. Oxford UP, 2018.
Teske, Joanna Klara. “Falsification of Interpretive Hypotheses in the Humanities.” Roczniki filozoficzne, vol. 66, no. 2, 2018, pp. 87–106.
Van Gelder, Tim. “What Might Cognition Be, If Not Computation?” The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 92, no. 7, 1995, pp. 345–81.
Vermeulen, Timotheus, and Robin van den Akker. “Notes on Metamodernism.” Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, vol. 2, 2010.
Waugh, Patricia. Metafiction: The Theory and Practice of Self-Conscious Fiction. Methuen, 1984.
Ziemińska, Renata. The History of Skepticism: In Search of Consistency. Translated by Jan Burzyński, Peter Lang, 2017.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2023-07-17 (4)
- 2023-07-17 (3)
- 2023-07-17 (2)
- 2023-07-14 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Except where otherwise noted, the content of this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License.
Accepted 2023-06-21
Published 2023-07-17
