Evaluation of the association between acne and smoking: systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies

Abstract

Background: Acne vulgaris is one of the most common skin diseases with a multifactorial pathogenesis.
Examination of the literature regarding the contribution of smoking to acne shows contradictory results.
The aim of this study was to undertake a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis about the
association between acne and smoking.
Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis, when possible were performed. The literature review
was based on Pubmed, Scopus and Google Scholar searches using the keywords “(smoking OR tobacco
OR nicotine OR cigarettes) AND acne”. Only cross-sectional studies were included. Meta-analyses were
performed using the RevMan software version 5 for Windows. Four different meta-analyses were carried out:
one evaluating the association between smoking habit and acne, one including data stratified by gender, one
for studies with a quality score > 6, and one relating to acne classification.
Results: Six studies were selected. The first meta-analysis, including all studies, showed a non-significant
role of smoke in the development of acne: OR 1.05 (95% CI: 0.66–1.67) with random effect estimate. The
second meta-analyses, including data stratified by gender, showed a OR=0.99 (95% CI: 0.57–1.73) for males
and a OR of 1.45 (95% CI: 0.08–24.64) for females, using random effect for the heterogeneity in both cases.
The third meta-analysis, included studies with a quality score >6 resulted in an estimated OR= 0.69 (95% CI:
0.55–0.85): in this case it was possible to use the fixed effect estimate. The last meta-analysis, concerning
the severity grading, showed a non-significant result: OR=1.09 (95% CI: 0.61–1.95) using the random effect
approach.
Conclusions: The first two meta-analyses found no signification association between smoking and the
development of acne. However, when we performed the analysis with only good quality studies, the
protective significant effect was evident.