Relativizzare la via per non relativizzare la meta? La bellezza a partire dal dibattito filosofico angloamericano contemporaneo

Autori

  • Simona Chiodo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13130/2240-9599/10369

Abstract

The article: 1. analyzes the Anglo-American philosophical works which, in the last thirty years, focus on the notion of beauty by making reference to Kant’s work (in particular, Beauty restored by Mary Mothersill, Only a promise of happiness: the place of be­auty in a world of art by Alexander Nehamas and Beauty by Roger Scruton); 2. argues that choosing Kant’s work means choosing a strategy which opens to a notion of beauty which is relative, but not relativistic, subjective, but not anarchic, that is, universal, but not absolute; 3. argues that the most powerful tool Kant introduces to make it possible relativizing the way (i.e., the form of beauty in a given space and in a given time) not to relativize the aim (i.e., the meaning of beauty, which is actually quite stable in the history of Western culture) may be his notion of ideal (which is almost ignored in the contemporary Anglo-American philosophical works), since it includes, and does not exclude, the most relative, particular and variable cases in its very genesis.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Armstrong J., 2004: The secret power of beauty, London, Allen Lane, 2004 (tr. it. Il potere segreto della bellezza: una guida al bello di ogni epoca, tr. it. di S. Piraccini, Parma, Guanda, 2007).

Danto A., 2003: The abuse of beauty: aesthetics and the concept of art, Chicago, Open Court, 2003 (tr. it. L’abuso della bellezza: da Kant alla Brillo Box, a cura di C. Italia, Milano, Postmedia Books, 2008).

Guyer P., 2005: Values of beauty: historical essays in aesthetics, Cambridge-New York, Cambridge University Press, 2005.

Heller A., 2012: The concept of the beautiful, Lanham, Lexington Books, 2012.

Kant I., V-Anth / Mron: Anthropologie Mrongovius, in Kants Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. 25, hrsg. von der königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin, Reimer, 1997.

Kant I., KrV: Kritik der reinen Vernunft, in Kants Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. 3, hrsg. von der königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin, Reimer, 1911 (tr. it. Critica della ragion pura, a cura di C. Esposito, Milano, Bompiani, 2010).

Kant I., KU: Kritik der Urteilskraft, in Kants Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. 5, hrsg. von der königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin, Reimer, 1913 (tr. it. Critica della capacità di giudizio, a cura di L. Amoroso, Milano, BUR, 2012).

McMahon J., 2007: Aesthetics and material beauty: aesthetics naturalized, New York-London, Routledge, 2007.

Meyer-Dinkgräfe D. (ed.), 2005: The future of beauty in theatre, literature and the arts, Newcastle, Cambridge Scholars Press, 2005.

Mothersill M., 1984: Beauty restored, New York, Adams-Bannister-Cox, 1991.

Nehamas A., 2007: Only a promise of happiness: the place of beauty in a world of art, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2007.

O’Hear A. (ed.), 2001: Philosophy at the new millennium, Cambridge-New York, Cambridge University Press, 2001.

Parsons G., Carlson A., 2008: Functional beauty, Oxford-New York, Oxford University Press, 2008.

Scruton R., 2009: Beauty: a very short introduction, Oxford-New York, Oxford University Press, 2011 (tr. it. La bellezza: ragione ed esperienza estetica, a cura di L. Majocchi, Milano, Vita e Pensiero, 2011).

Zangwill N., 2001: The metaphysics of beauty, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 2001 (tr. it. La metafisica della bellezza, a cura di M. Di Monte, Milano, Marinotti, 2011).

Dowloads

Pubblicato

2018-07-15

Fascicolo

Sezione

Varia