Thematic Section

Caravaggio’s gyroscope: on the two “moments” of the virtual experience

Author(s)
Keywords
  • Caravaggio
  • Frank Stella
  • Michael Fried
  • Immersion and Specularity
  • Virtual Reality Cinema
Abstract

In the first of the Charles Eliot Norton Lectures that he gave at Harvard in 1984, Frank Stella focused on “The necessity of creating pictorial space that is capable of dissolving its own perimeter and surface plane,” and claimed that “No one helped lighten this burden more than Caravaggio.” At a certain point in his talk, the American artist went so far as to say that Caravaggio anticipated the invention of the gyroscope, the technological device which makes the virtual experience possible. Stella’s lecture is the starting point for developing an anachronistic path through pictorial and digital media, in light of their ability to produce
illusionistic effects on viewers. In particular, building on Michael Fried’s theory of art and image, this paper investigates virtual experience with reference to two different moments: the “immersive” moment, in which one has the impression of stepping into the frame, and the “specular” one, where the illusionistic effects are revealed; the attraction, when sinking into an image that has become an environment, and the distancing, when the image itself beckons to us and we are invited to reflect on our position as viewers.

References
  1. Acquarelli, L., “The spectacle of re-enactment and the critical time of the testimony in Inarritu’s Carne y Arena,” in F. Aldama, A. Rafele, eds., Cultural Studies in the Digital Age (San Diego: San Diego University Press, 2020): 103-118.
  2. Benedetti, S., “Caravaggio’s Taking of Christ, a masterpiece rediscovered,” The Burlington Magazine 135, no. 1088 (1993): 731-741.
  3. Bersani, L., Dutoit, U., Caravaggio’s Secrets (Cambridge-London: MIT Press, 1998).
  4. Careri, G., Caravaggio. La Fabbrica dello Spettatore (Milan: Jaca Book, 2017).
  5. Catricalà, V., Eugeni, R., “Technologically modified self–centred worlds. Modes of presence as effects of sense in virtual, augmented, mixed and extended reality,” in F. Biggio, V. Dos Santos, G.T. Giuliana, eds. Meaning-Making in Extended Reality (Rome: Aracne, 2020): 63-90.
  6. Conte, P., Unframing Aesthetics (Milan: Mimesis International, 2020).
  7. D’Aloia, A., “Virtually present, physically invisible: virtual reality immersion and emersion in Alejandro González Iñárritu's Carne y Arena,” in Senses of Cinema (June 2018), http://sensesofcinema.com/2018/feature-articles/virtually-present-physically-invisible-virtual-reality-immersion-and-emersion-in-alejandro-gonzalez-inarritus-carne-y-arena/, accessed January 10, 2023.
  8. Dalmasso, A.C., “The body as virtual frame. Performativity of the image in immersive environments,” Cinéma & Cie 19/23 (2019): 101-119.
  9. Diodato, R., Image, Art, and Virtuality: Towards an Aesthetics of Relation (Cham: Springer, 2021).
  10. Eugeni, R., Capitale algoritmico. Cinque dispositivi postmediali (più uno) (Brescia: Morcelliana, 2021).
  11. Foucault, M., The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences (1966) (London-New York: Routledge, 2002).
  12. Fried, M., Art and Objecthood: Essays and Reviews (Chicago-London: University of Chicago Press, 1998).
  13. Fried, M., The Moment of Caravaggio (Princeton-Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2010).
  14. Fried, M., Theatricality and Absorption: Painting and Beholder in the Age of Diderot (Chicago-London: University of Chicago Press, 1983).
  15. Gombrich, E., Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representations (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1961).
  16. Husserl, E. Phantasy and Image Consciousness, in E. Husserl, Phantasy, Image Consciousness, and Memory (1898–1925). Edmund Husserl Collected Works, vol 11 (Dordrecht: Springer, 2005).
  17. Longhi, R., “Un originale di Caravaggio a Rouen e il problema delle copie caravaggesche,” Paragone 121 (1960): 23-36.
  18. Marin, L., On Representation (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002).
  19. Montani, P., Tre forme di creatività: tecnica, arte, politica (Napoli: Cronopio, 2017).
  20. Pinotti, A., Alla soglia dell’immagine. Da Narciso alla realtà virtuale (Torino: Einaudi, 2021).
  21. Sontag, S., Regarding the Pain of Others (New York: Picador, 2003).
  22. Stella, F., Working Space (Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press, 1986).
  23. Treleani, M., Zucconi, F., eds., “Remediating Distances,” IMG Journal 3 (2020).
  24. Uricchio, W., Ding, S., Wolozin, S., and Boyacioglu, B., Virtually There: Documentary Meets Virtual Reality Conference Report (The MIT Open Documentary Laboratory, 2016), 17–18, http://opendoclab.mit.edu/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/MIT_OpenDocLab_VirtuallyThereConference.pdf, accessed January 10, 2023.
  25. Wittgenstein, L., Philosophical Investigations (Pearson, 1973).
  26. Zucconi, F., Displacing Caravaggio: Art, Media, and Humanitarian Visual Culture (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018).
  27. Zucconi, F., “Sulla tendenza utopica nel VR cinema,” Carte Semiotiche 7 (2021): 118-126.
  28. Zucconi, F., “Regarding the image of the pain of others: Caravaggio, Sontag, Leogrande,” Humanities 11 (2022), https://doi.org/10.3390/h11020044.
Read Article
Published

20 December 2022

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54103/ai/18191
How to Cite
Zucconi, F. (2022). Caravaggio’s gyroscope: on the two “moments” of the virtual experience. AN-ICON. Studies in Environmental Images [ISSN 2785-7433], 1(II). https://doi.org/10.54103/ai/18191
Copy

Issue
Vol. 1 No. II (2022): Just an illusion? Between simulation, emulation, and hyper-realism

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
License
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.