Thematic Section

Hallucinatory syndromes / Immersion in the image. Classical theories and perspectives

Author(s)
Keywords
  • Hallucinatory syndromes
  • Immersion in the image
  • Classical theories and perspectives
Abstract

From the outset, the inventors of 3D, VR/AR and analogue and digital immersion thought of these devices as functional models of our perceptive capacities, serving to expand our sensory knowledge and to support our communications based on multisensory storytelling. How is it that a solid critical tradition then assimilates them to hallucinatory phenomena? The answer lies in marketing techniques that have always associated dreams and illusions with the desire to play with reality. But there is a deeper, epistemic reason.
The sources of scientific thought of hallucinations are marked, in the 19th century, by the theory of “sensations without objects.” Perception being distorted, the knowledge it provides is pointless. It is therefore possible to replace the vacant object with our desires to act out subjectively the real. This conviction initiated by Dr. Jean-Étienne Dominique Esquirol has survived to the present day. However, the history of the scientific approach of hallucinations shows another theoretical framework, particularly prolific but curiously forgotten: the theory of reality monitoring and arbitration of sources of information provided from Dr. Henri Ey. We propose to forge on these concepts a critical tool of the current mediadesign.

References
  1. Awh, E., Vogel, E.K., Oh, S.H., “Interactions between attention and working memory,” Neuroscience 139, no. 1 (2006): 201-208, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.08.023.
  2. Bastiaansen, M.C.M. et al., “I see what you mean: Theta power increases are involved in the retrieval of lexical semantic information,” Brain and Language 106 (2008): 15-28, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2007.10.006.
  3. Baudry, J.L., “The device,” Communications 23 (1975): 56-72.
  4. Bentall, R.P., “The illusion of reality: a review and integration of psychological research on hallucinations,” Psychological Bulletin 107, no. 1: 82, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.82.
  5. Binet, A., “The problem of colored hearing,” Revue des Deux Mondes 113 (1892): 586-614.
  6. Bordwell, D., Narration in the Fiction Film (London-New York: Routledge, 1987).
  7. Brébion, G. et al., “Reality monitoring failure in schizophrenia: The role of selective attention,” Schizophrenia Research 22, no. 2 (15 Nov. 1996): 173-180, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-9964(96)00054-0.
  8. Clottes, J., Lewis-Williams, D., Les Chamans de la Préhistoire. Trans et Magie dans les Grottes Ornées, (Paris: Le Seuil, 1996)
  9. Cutting, J.E., “Perceiving scenes in film and in the world,” in J.D. Anderson, B.F. Anderson, eds., Moving Image Theory: Ecological Considerations (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2005).
  10. Deacon, T., Symbolic Species (New York: W.W. Norton, 1997).
  11. Lewis-Williams, D., The Mind in the Cave: Consciousness and the Origins of Art (New York: Thames and Hudson, 2002).
  12. Francuz, P., Zabielska-Mendyk, E., “Does the brain differentiate between related and unrelated cuts when processing audiovisual messages? An ERP study,” Media Psychology 16, no. 4 (2013): 461-475.
  13. Gibson, J.J., The Perception of the Visual World (Cambridge: The Riverside Press, 1950).
  14. Gimenez, G., Guimont, M., Pedinielli, J., “Study of the evolution of the concept of hallucination in classical psychiatric literature,” L'evolution psychiatrique 68 (2003): 289-298.
  15. Green, B.F., “Figure coherence in the kinetic depth effect,” Journal of Experimental Psychology 62, no. 3 (1961): 272-282, https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045622.
  16. Grohmann, T., “Délire et hallucination en schizophrénie: une perspective phénoménologique,” Phainomenon 28 (2018): 103-125.
  17. Gruesser, O.J., Hagner, M., “On the history of deformation phosphenes and the idea of internal light generated in the eye for the purpose of vision,” Documenta Ophthalmologica 74 (1990): 57-85.
  18. Guerra-Doce, E., “The origins of inebriation: archaeological evidence of the consumption of Fermented Beverages and drugs in prehistoric Eurasia,” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 22 (2014): 751-782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-014-9205-z.
  19. Heiman, K.S. et al., “Cuts in action: a high-density EEG study investigating the neural correlates of different editing techniques in film,” Cognitive Science 41 (2017): 1555-1588, https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12439.
  20. Hubel, D.H., Wiesel, T.N., Brain and Visual Perception: The Story of a 25-year Collaboration (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005).
  21. Johnson, M.K., Hashtroudi, S., Lindsay, D.S., “Source monitoring,” Psychological Bulletin 114 (1993): 3-28, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3.
  22. Johnson, M.K., Raye C.L., “Reality monitoring,” Psychological Review 88 (1981): 67-85, https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-295X.88.1.67.
  23. Kimura, M. et al., “Human visual system automatically encodes sequential regularities of discrete events,” Journal of Cognitive Neurosciences 22, no. 6 (2010): 1124-1139, https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21299.
  24. Kutas, M., Federmeier, K.D., “Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4, no. 12 (2000): 463-470, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01560-6.
  25. Lankine, K. et al., “Consistency and similarity of MEG- and fMRI-signal time courses during movie viewing,” NeuroImage 173 (2018): 361-369.
  26. Merleau-Ponty, M., Phénoménologie de la Perception (1945) (Paris: Gallimard, 2011).
  27. Pajunen, K., Immersed in Illusion, an Ecological Approach to the Virtual (Bookwell: Acta Universitatis Lapponiensis, 2012).
  28. Plato, The Republic, Book VII.
  29. Posner, M.I., “Orienting of attention,” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32 (1980): 3-25.
  30. Rabeyron, T., “Exceptional experiences: between neuroscience and psychoanalysis,” Research in Psychoanalysis no. 8 (2009).
  31. Rosenthal D., Consciousness and Mind (Oxford University Press, 2005).
  32. Roth, J.K. et al., “Similar and dissociable mechanisms for attention to internal versusexternalinformation,” NeuroImage 48 (2009): 601-60.
  33. Schnider, A., “Spontaneous confabulation, reality monitoring, and the limbic system - a review,” Brain Research Reviews 36, no. 2–3 (2001): 150-160, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0173(01)00090-X.
  34. Sobieszczanski, M., Les Médias Immersifs Informatisés. Raisons Cognitives de la Ré-analogisation (Bern: Peter Lang 2015).
  35. Sobieszczanski, M., “Two key factors in the history of communicating immersive environments: mix of reality vs. cognitive realism,” LINKs-series, no. 1-2 (2019), https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02281583.
  36. Souriau, E., “The structure of the film universe and the vocabulary of filmology,” Revue internationale de filmologie 7-8 (1951).
  37. Sutherland, I.E., “A head-mounted three-dimensional display,” Proceeding AFIPS '68, Fall, part I (Proceedings of the December 9-11 1968), https://doi.org/10.1145/1476589.1476686.
  38. Tikka, P. et al., “Enactive cinema paves way for understanding complex real-time social interaction in neuroimaging experiments,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (2012), https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00298.
  39. Tikka, P., Rasmus, V., Mauri, K., “Narrative logic of enactive cinema: obsession,” Digital Creativity 17, no. 4 (2006): 205-212, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14626260601074078.
  40. Wallach, H., O'Connell, D.N., “The kinetic depth effect,” Journal of Experimental Psychology 45, no. 4 (1953): 205, https://doi.org/10.1037/h0056880.
  41. Wellek, R., Warren, A., Theory of Literature (Harcourt Brace, and Company, 1948).