Thematic Section

Immersivity as An-immersivity

Author(s)
Keywords
  • Ordinary and immersive experience
  • Virtual reality and art
  • Experience economy
  • Control
  • Uncontrollability
Abstract

The title of this project, “An-icon,” refers to “images that deny themselves.” Virtual reality may be viewed as a typical, though not exclusive, case able to illustrate this kind of image: we know we have crossed the threshold of an environment that consists of images (ontologically), but we experience it (phenomenologically) as if it were a real environment. Something similar can be said about immersivity, but reversing the perspective: we are (ontologically) immersed in reality (virtual or non-virtual), but (phenomenologically) we know and say we are, and for this very reason we reject the idea that we are simply immersed in an environment.
This applies first and foremost to our experience in general, regardless of the status of the experiences we gain through virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR) or mixed reality (MR).
And yet, within this very general condition, human beings have over time created environments and works that carve out zones of “special immersivity,” so to speak, dedicated to immersion. What are we looking for in VR immersivity? Are new immersive technologies merely refinements of older techniques, or can they affect our relationship with ourselves, reality, and others in novel ways? What are artistic practices called on to do when faced with such new technological practices?

References
  1. Christov-Bakargiev, C., Janet Cardiff: A Survey of Works Including Collaborations with George Bures Miller (New York: P.S.1 Contemporary Art Center, 2003).
  2. DeSalle, R., Our Senses: An Immersive Experience (New Haven-London: Yale University Press, 2018).
  3. Durt, C., Fuchs, T., Tewes, C., eds., Embodiment, Enaction, and Culture (Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 2017).
  4. Foster Wallace, D., This is Water, 2005, commencement speech to the graduating class at Kenyon College, https://fs.blog/david-foster-wallace-this-is-water/, accessed December 28, 2022.
  5. Garroni, E., Estetica: Uno sguardo-attraverso (Milan: Garzanti, 1992).
  6. Garroni, E., Immagine, linguaggio, figura (Roma-Bari: Laterza, 2005).
  7. Gilmore, J., Pine II, B.J., Authenticity. What Consumers Really Want (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2007).
  8. Gilmore, J., Pine II, B.J., The Experience Economy (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1999, updated edition 2011).
  9. Goffman, E., Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience (1974) (Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1986).
  10. Grau, O., From Illusion to Immersion (2001), trans. G. Custance (Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 2003).
  11. Jensen, R., “Dream Society,” The Futurist 30, no. 3 (1996): 9-13.
  12. Kant, I., Critique of the Power of Judgment (1790), trans. P. Guyer and E. Matthews (Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000).
  13. Kelsey, R., Photography and the Art of Chance (Cambridge MA-London: Harvard University Press, 2015).
  14. Modena, E., Nelle storie: Arte, cinema e media immersivi (Rome: Carocci, 2022).
  15. Nagel, T., “The Absurd,” in Mortal Questions (London: Canto, 1979): 11-23.
  16. Noë, A., Learning to Look: Dispatches from the Art World (New York: Oxford University Press, 2021).
  17. Pett, E., Experiencing Cinema: Participatory Film Cultures, Immersive Media and the Experience Economy (New York-London: Bloomsbury, 2021).
  18. Pinotti, A., Alla soglia dell’immagine (Turin: Einaudi, 2021).
  19. Rigal, G., Le temps sacré des cavernes (Paris: Corti, 2016).
  20. Rosa, H., The Uncontrollability of the World (2018), trans. J.C. Wagner (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2020).
  21. Roussel, C., “If Blindness Creates a New World,” CJDS 8, no. 6 (2019): 108-130.
  22. Schulze, G., Die Erlebnisgesellschaft: Kultursoziologie der Gegenwart (Frankfurt am Main-New York: Campus-Verlag, 1993).
  23. Stavrinaki, M., Saisis par la préhistoire: Enquête sur l'art et le temps des modernes (Paris: Les presses du réel, 2019).
  24. Stewart, J., Gapenne, O., Di Paolo, E.A., Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010).
  25. Stiegler, C., The 360° Gaze: Immersions in Media, Society, and Culture (London: MIT Press, 2021).
  26. Velotti, S., “Art in the time of Pandemic: Three Terms,” Paradigmi 39, no. 1 (2021): 127-140.
  27. Velotti, S., Dialettica del controllo: Limiti della sorveglianza e pratiche artistiche (Roma: Castelvecchi, 2017).
  28. Velotti, S., The Present of Photography and the Dialectics of Control, in Delogu, A. Dandini de Sylva, eds., Fotografia: Il presente (Macerata: Quodlibet, 2015): 21-29.
  29. Wittgenstein, L., Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology, and Religious Belief (Berkeley-Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1967).
  30. Zerubavel, E., Hidden in Plain Sight: The Social Structure of Irrelevance (New York: Oxford University Press, 2015).
Read Article
Published

28 December 2023

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54103/ai/19726
How to Cite
Velotti, S. (2023). Immersivity as An-immersivity. AN-ICON. Studies in Environmental Images [ISSN 2785-7433], 2(I). https://doi.org/10.54103/ai/19726
Copy

Issue
Vol. 2 No. I (2023): Immersions and Dives: From the Environment to Virtual Reality

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
License
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.