Thematic Section

Mutual Transformations : Unstable Relations between VR-Works, Environments and Exhibitions

Author(s)
Keywords
  • VR-art
  • Environmental immersion
  • Epistemic
  • Objects installation art
  • De-distancing/de-differentiation
Abstract

In contemporary understanding, a now normalized immersion continues to be associated with digitality and high-tech apparatuses, but is also seen as diffused into the lifeworld. Against this backdrop, the article focuses on two current artworks that extend the internal environmentality inherent in VR as a spatialized image into physical space by using strategies from installation and site-related art. These examples provide for an equation and nesting of work, environment and exhibition that is interpreted here as a potentiated environmentalization. The artistic VR-environments by no means negate their rootedness in imagery, but rather self-reflexively reveal the transitions between image and three-dimensionality, what gives them a special epistemic valence. It thus seems worthwhile to relate them to considerations of knowledge objects and exhibitions, but also to (queer) phenomenological theories of entanglement and becoming originating from the following of lines. Meanwhile, the epistemic value of their latent objects, disoriented paths, and impossible spaces is only revealed in the interaction with and embodied experience of the virtual space. The article thus participates in debates on how bodily immersion does not exclude, but enables action and reflection within aesthetic experience. With regard to two fundamental paradigms of immersion, it can show how, for this purpose, the artworks turn anew the strategies of de-distancing and de-differentiation.

References
  1. Ahmed, S., Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others (Durham: Duke University Press, 2006).
  2. Anonym, “About New Art City,” https://info.newart.city/about, accessed December 28, 2022.
  3. Arns, I., “Qualityland, oder: Der Immersion begegnen,” in U. Blumenreich et al., eds., Jahrbuch für Kulturpolitik 2017/18: Welt. Kultur. Politik - Kulturpolitik in Zeiten der Globalisierung (Bielefeld: transcript-Verlag, 2018): 211-220.
  4. Bal, M., Exhibiton-ism: Temporal Togetherness (Berlin: Sternberg Press, 2020).
  5. Bieger, L., “Ästhetik der Immersion: Wenn Räume wollen. Immersives Erleben als Raumerleben,” in G. Lehnert, ed., Raum und Gefüh: Der Spatial Turn und die neue Emotionsforschung (Bielefeld: transcript-Verlag, 2011): 75-95.
  6. Bruno, G., Atmospheres of Projection: Environmentality in Art and Screen Media (Chicago-London: Chicago University Press, 2021).
  7. Diodato, R., Image, Art and Virtuality: Towards an Aesthetics of Relations (Cham: Springer, 2021).
  8. Eugeni, R., Raciti, G., eds., “Atmosfere mediali,” VCS Visual Culture Studies. Rivista semestrale di cultura visuale, no. 1 (November 2020).
  9. Casetti, F., Somaini, A., “Resolution: Digital Materialities, Thresholds of Visibility,” NECSUS. European Journal of Media Studies 7, no. 1 (2018): 87-103.
  10. Grabbe, L.C., “Homo Immergens: Immersion as a Parameter for a Media and Cultural Theory of Medial Hybridity,” in J. Bracker, A. Hubrich, eds., The Art of Reception (Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing 2021): 400-422.
  11. Griffiths, A., Shivers Down Your Spine: Cinema, Museums, and the Immersive View (New York: Columbia University Press, 2008).
  12. Gross, L., Menkman, R., L 13. Reader NR 4 im/possible images (München: Lothringer 13 Halle, 2022).
  13. Günzel, S., “Vor dem Affekt: die Aktion - Emotion und Raumbild,” in G. Lehnert, ed., Raum und Gefühl. Der Spatial Turn und die neue Emotionsforschung (Bielefeld: transcript-Verlag, 2014): 63-74.
  14. Hochscherf, T., Kjär, H., Rupert-Kruse, P., “Phänomene und Medien der Immersion,” in Jahrbuch immersiver Medien 3 (2011): 9-19.
  15. Ingold, T., “Drawing Together: Materials, Gestures, Lines,” in T. Otto, N. Bubandt, eds., Experiments in Holism: Theory and Practice in Contemporary Anthropology (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010): 299-313.
  16. Ingold, T., Anusas, M., “Designing Environmental Relations: From Opacity to Textility,” Design Issues 29, no. 4 (2013): 58-69.
  17. Ingold, T., Knowing from the Inside: Correspondences (Aberdeen: University of Aberdeen, 2017).
  18. Kasprowicz, D., Der Körper auf Tauchstation: Zu einer Wissensgeschichte der Immersion (Baden Baden: Nomos, 2019).
  19. Kolesch, D., “Ästhetik der Immersion, in G. W. Bertram, S. Deines, D. M. Feige,” eds. Die Kunst und die Künste: Ein Kompendium zur Kunsttheorie der Gegenwart (Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2021): 422-441.
  20. Kwastek, K., “Immersed in Reflection? The Aesthetic Experience of Interactive Media Art,” in B. Dogramaci, F. Liptay, eds., Immersion in the Visual Arts and Media (Leiden, Boston: Brill Rodopi, 2016): 66-85.
  21. Menkman, R., “Im/possible Images@Lothringer 13, Munich https://beyondresolution.info/Impossible_Images, accessed December 29, 2022.
  22. Menkman, R., “The BLOB of Im/possible Images” https://newart.city/show/menkman-blob-of-im-possibilities, accessed December 30, 2022.
  23. Nolasco-Rózsás, L., Hofmann, Y., “The Museum as a Cognitive System of Human and Non-Human Actors,” The Garage Journal: Studies in Art, Museums & Culture, no. 3 (2021): 1-15.
  24. Paul, C., Digital Art (London: Thames and Hudson, 2003).
  25. Rieger, S., Schäfer, A., Tuschling, A., eds., Virtuelle Lebenswelten. Körper - Räume - Affekte (Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2021).
  26. Roßler, G., Der Anteil der Dinge an der Gesellschaft (Bielefeld: transcript, 2015): 19-58.
  27. Schröter, J., “Die Ästhetik der virtuellen Welt: Überlegungen mit Niklas Luhmann und Jeffrey Shaw,“ in M. Bogen, R. Kuck, J. Schröter, eds., Virtuelle Welten als Basistechnologie für Kunst und Kultur? Eine Bestandsaufnahme (Bielefeld: transcript, 2015): 25-36.
  28. Urban, A. “Virtual Spaces for Transformative Encounters and Vast Reciprocity - An Interview with Theodoulos Polyviou and Jazmina Figueroa,” in L. Nolasco-Rózsás, ed., Beyond Matter, Within Space: Curatorial and Art Mediation Techniques on the Verge of Virtual Reality, vol. 1, 2023 [forthcoming].
  29. Voss, C., “Das Museum als Medium der Kunst” in G.W. Bertram, S. Deines, D. M. Feige, eds. Die Kunst und die Künste: Ein Kompendium zur Kunsttheorie der Gegenwart (Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2021): 464-483.