Thematic Section

Inhabiting the museum: a history of physical presence from analog to digital exhibition spaces

Author(s)
Keywords
  • Museum
  • Visitor body
  • Technology
  • Exercise of power
  • Proximities
Abstract

The present contribution wants to investigate how the use of technology is redefining the performative role of visitor bodies within museum environments. It will address the topic of the physical body of museum goers as an experiential tool and discuss to what extent its active, at times performative, use across museum settings has been and is considered as an important element of the cultural experience. This research offers a storeographical account which begins from visitor engagement in the early 17th to 19th century museums, continues with an account of the ‘disappearance’ of the visitor body in modern museums (Candlin, 2004), and proceeds analysing the revival of a more systemic and bodily understanding of these spaces (Howes, 2014), with technologies playing a very important role in incentivizing and characterizing this shift. The case for the positive interplay between museums and technological artistic experience towards a performative engagement of the visitor’s physical presence will be made through the case study of the Nxt Museum, in Amsterdam. The specific project that will be here analyzed is the Shifting Proximities exhibition, which explores human experience and interaction in the face of social and technological change. Through this last institutional account the research will complete its itinerary through performative action across museum experiences in time and space, arguing for the relevance that technological media can play in transforming visitors’ relationship with art through their bodies. 

References
  1. Adorno, T., Horkheimer, M., Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments (1947), trans. E. Jephcott (London: Verso, 1986).
  2. Barry, A., Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society (New York: Athlone Press, 2001).
  3. Bazin, G., The Museum Age (New York: Universe Books, 1967).
  4. Bennett, T., The Birth of the Museum: History, Theory, Politics (London-New York: Routledge, 1995).
  5. Berlin, I., “Two Concepts of Liberty,” in Four Essays on Liberty (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969): 118-172.
  6. Bolter, J.D., Grusin, R., Remediation: Understanding New Media (Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1998).
  7. Borselli, D., Ravaioli, G., “Facing Power: Fotografia, partecipazione e tattiche di resistenza artistica nella sorveglianza contemporanea, ” VCS. Visual Culture Studies 5 (2022): 115-132, https://hdl.handle.net/11585/922401.
  8. Bourdieu, P., “Three Forms of Capital,” in A.H. Halsey, ed., Education: Culture, Economy and Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).
  9. Bryson, N., Vision and Painting: The Logic of the Gaze (London-Basingstoke: Macmillan Press, 1983).
  10. Candlin, F., Art, Museums and Touch (Manchester: University of Manchester Press, 2010).
  11. Classen, C., The Deepest Sense: A Cultural History of Touch (Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2012).
  12. Crimp, D., On the Museum’s Ruins (Cambridge, MA-London: MIT Press, 1993).
  13. de Bolla, P., The Education of the Eye (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003).
  14. Dickens, C. Jr., Dickens’s Dictionary of the Thames (1893), (New York: Taurus Press, 1972).
  15. Eugeni, R., “Che cosa sarà un dispositivo: Archeologia e prospettive di uno strumento per pensare i media,” in J.L. Baudry, Il dispositivo: Cinema, media, soggettività, ed. R. Eugeni (Brescia: La Scuola, 2017).
  16. Eugeni, R., La condizione postmediale: Media linguaggi e narrazioni (Milan: La Scuola, 2015).
  17. Fingerhut, J., “Habits and the enculturated mind: pervasive arti-facts, predictive processing, and expansive habits,” in F. Caruana, I. Testa, eds., Habits: Pragmatist Approaches from Cognitive Neuroscience to Social Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022): 352-375, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108682312.018.
  18. Foucault, M., Archaeology of Knowledge (1969), trans. A. M. Sheridan Smith (London: Routledge, 2002).
  19. Foucault, M., The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences (1966) (London: Vintage, 1994).
  20. Henning, M., Museums, Media and Cultural Theory (Maidenhead UK: Open University Press, 2006).
  21. Hetherington, K., “Foucault, the Museum and the Diagram,” Sociological Review 53, no. 3 (2011): 457-475, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2011.02016.x.
  22. Howes, D., “Introduction to Sensory Museology,” The Senses and Society 9, no. 3 (2014): 259-267, https://doi.org/10.2752/174589314X14023847039917.
  23. Kauffman, A., “Manet, museum, modernism: Michel Foucault and modernist art history,” Journal of Art Historiography, no. 22 (Jun 2020): 1-21.
  24. Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B., “The Museum as Catalyst,” keynote address at ICOM Sweden conference “Museum 2000: Confirmation or Challenge?,” Vadstena, September 29, 2000, http://www.michaelfehr.net/Museum/Texte/vadstena.pdf.
  25. Lord, B., “Foucault’s museums: difference, representation, and genealogy,” Museum and society 4, no. 1 (March 2006): 11-14, http://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/museumstudies/museumsociety/documents/volumes/1lord.pdf.
  26. Mauss, M., “Techniques of the Body,” trans. B. Brewster, Economy and Society 2 (1973): 70-88.
  27. Mayer-Schönberger, V., Kenneth, C., Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think (Boston-New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcour, 2013).
  28. Neurath, O., Encyclopedia and Sociology, eds. M. Neurath, R.Cohen (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1973).
  29. Newen., A., De Bruin, L., Gallager, S., The Oxford Handbook of 4E cognition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).
  30. Noordegraaf, J., Strategies of Display, Museum Presentation in Nineteenth and Twentieth-Century Visual Culture (Rotterdam: Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, 2004).
  31. O’Doherty, B., Inside the White Cube: The Ideology of the Gallery Space (Berkeley-Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1976).
  32. Otter, C., The Victorian Eye (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2008).
  33. Pinotti, A., Somaini, A., Cultura visuale: Immagini sguardi media dispositivi (Turin: Einaudi, 2016).
  34. Plantin, J.C., Punathambekar, A., “Digital media infrastructures, pipes, platforms and politics,” Media, Culture and Society 41, no. 2 (2018): 163-174, https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718818376.
  35. Pomian, K., Collectors and Curiosities: Paris and Venice, 1500-1800 (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990).
  36. Pomian, K., Le musée, une histoire mondiale, 2 vols. (Paris, Gallimard, 2020).
  37. Rees Leahy, H., Museum Bodies: The Politics and Practices of Visiting and Viewing (Farnham UK: Ashgate Publishing, 2012).
  38. Savini, F., Dembski, S., “Manufacturing the creative city: Symbols and politics of Amsterdam North,” Cities: The International Journal of Urban Policy and Planning 55 (2016): 139-147, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.02.013.
  39. Stadler, F., ed., Encyclopedia and Utopia: The Life and Work of Otto Neurath, (London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996).
Read Article
Published

29 December 2023

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54103/ai/19907
How to Cite
Calise, A. (2023). Inhabiting the museum: a history of physical presence from analog to digital exhibition spaces. AN-ICON. Studies in Environmental Images [ISSN 2785-7433], 2(II). https://doi.org/10.54103/ai/19907
Copy

Issue
Vol. 2 No. II (2023): Immersions and Dives: From the Environment to Virtual Reality

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
License
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.