Thematic Section

How Digital Hybridization Creates New Performance Practices: The Case of Alternate Virtuality Games

Author(s)
Keywords
  • Alternate reality game
  • Liminality
  • Digital studies
  • Mediatic event
  • Subjectivation
Abstract

In this paper, we examine a new set of hybrid ludic practices utilizing cross-media narration that emerged with the rise of the Internet commonly called Alternate Reality Games. However, we propose to coin the term Alternate Virtuality Games (or AVG) as a way to distinguish these digital practices from their real-life counterpart. Viral online AVGs like This House Has People in It (Resnick, 2016) or Ben Drowned (Jadusable, 2010) are emblematic of a horizontal relationship between work and spectator, as well as performance outside of art institutions. The immersiveness of AVGs is unbound by the space and time of a specific happening, and is rather experienced by a multitude of agents at different times and places. This characteristic of being an extra-individual experience as well as being independent from institutions also places AVGs within liminal experiences such as studied by anthropologist Victor Turner.
As such, we analyze these hybrid games as a mean for the 21st century spectator to overturn societal status quo through newfound agency. These performing agents get into a subjective state where they can experience and criticize our relationship to digital devices in a society of information and control, without being subjected to it.

References
  1. Agamben, G., What Is an Apparatus? and Other Essays (2006), trans. D. Kishik, S. Pedatella (Redwood City CA: Stanford University Press, 2009).
  2. Antonioli, M., “Le stade esthétique de la production/consommation et la révolution du temps choisi,” Multitudes, no. 69 (2017): 109-114, https://doi.org/10.3917/mult.069.0109.
  3. Bataille, G., L’expérience intérieure (Paris: Gallimard, 1943).
  4. Bekirov, A., Vaillancourt, T., “Esquisse d’une généalogie du romanesque, du point de vue du jeu vidéo,” in I. Hautbout, S. Wit, eds., Jeu vidéo et romanesque (Paris: Classiques Garnier, 2021): 117-130.
  5. Bekirov, A., Vaillancourt, T., “Le jeu-vidéo, expérience-limite du sujet,” Marges, no. 24 (2017): 30-44, https://doi.org/10.4000/marges.1255.
  6. Benjamin, W., The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility and Other Writings on Media, ed. M. W. Jennings, B. Doherty, T. Y. Levin, trans. E. Jephcott, et al. (Cambridge, MA-London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2008).
  7. Benjamin, W., Toward the Critique of Violence: A Critical Edition, ed. P. Fenves, J. Ng (Redwood City: Stanford University Press, 2021).
  8. Bonenfant, M., Le libre jeu: Réflexion sur l’appropriation de l’activité ludique (Montréal: Liber, 2015).
  9. Bonsignore, E. et al., “Alternate Reality Games as a Platform for Practicing 21st Century Literacies,” International Journal of Learning and Media 4, no. 1 (2013): 25-50.
  10. Citton, Y., The Ecology of Attention (2014), trans. B. Norman (Cambridge: Polity, 2017).
  11. Debord, G., The Society of the Spectacle (1967), trans. D. Nicholson-Smith (New York: Zone Books, 1994).
  12. Foucault, M., Dits et écrits, 4 vols. (Paris: Gallimard, 1994).
  13. Foucault, M., Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-78, trans. G. Burchell (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).
  14. Garcia, A., Niemeyer, G., eds., Alternate Reality Games and the Cusp of Digital Gameplay (New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2017).
  15. Groupierre, K., Lelievre, E., “Les ARG comme paradigme de l’immersion: Exemple du projet ‘Ghost Invaders – Les Mystères de la Basilique,’” Sociétés, no. 134 (2016): 67-81, https://doi.org/10.3917/soc.134.0067.
  16. Jagoda, P., et al., “Worlding Through Play: Alternate Reality Games, Large-Scale Learning, And ‘The Source,’” American Journal of Play 8, no. 1 (2015): 74-100.
  17. Klossowski, P., La Ressemblance (Marseille: Ryôan-Ji, 1984).
  18. Klossowski, P., The Living Currency (1970), trans. D. W. Smith, N. Morar, V. W. Cisney (New York: Bloomsbury, 2017)
  19. Latour, B., Lowe, A., “La migration de l’aura ou comment explorer un original par le biais de ses fac-similés,” Intermédialités, no. 17 (2011): 173-191, https://doi.org/10.7202/1005756.
  20. Lyotard, J.-F., Des dispositifs pulsionnels (Paris: Galilée, 1973).
  21. McGonigal, J., “This Is Not a Game: Immersive Aesthetics and Collective Play,” Streamingworlds Conference Proceedings (Melbourne: 2003).
  22. Simondon, G., Du monde d’existence des objets techniques (Paris: Aubier, 1989).
  23. Turner, V., “Liminality, Khaballah, and the Media,” Religion, no. 15 (1985): 205-217.
  24. Turner, V., “Liminal to Liminoid, in Play, Flow, and Ritual: An Essay in Comparative Symbology,” Rice University Studies 60, no. 3 (1974): 53-96, https://hdl.handle.net/1911/63159.66.
  25. van Gennep, A., The Rites of Passage: A Classic Study of Cultural Celebrations (1909), trans. M.B. Vizedom, G.L. Caffee (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960).
  26. Winnicott, D., Playing and Reality (London: Tavistock, 1971).
Read Article
Published

29 December 2023

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54103/ai/19908
How to Cite
Bekirov, A., & Vaillancourt, T. (2023). How Digital Hybridization Creates New Performance Practices: The Case of Alternate Virtuality Games. AN-ICON. Studies in Environmental Images [ISSN 2785-7433], 2(II). https://doi.org/10.54103/ai/19908
Copy

Issue
Vol. 2 No. II (2023): Immersions and Dives: From the Environment to Virtual Reality

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
License
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.