Thematic Section

The Problem of Empathy in Immersive Experiences on Global Warming: A Matter of Empathy, Embodiment, and Hyperobjects

Author(s)
Keywords
  • 360° VR film
  • Anthropocene
  • Empathy
  • Global warming
  • Hyperobject
Abstract

My paper focuses on the problem of empathetic response in immersive experiences concerning global warm- ing issues. Following a rich scientific production, which points out the idea of virtual reality as both “the ultimate empathy machine” – as firstly stated by filmmaker Chris Milk – and a promising tool to promote ecological awareness, my essay presents, in the first place, the main characteristics of immer- sive experiences concerning the issue, showing how viewers interact with the environment from the perspective of presence, and body ownership. As describing potentials and limits of empathetic response in virtual environments, I draw attention to the fact that now it is impossible to build virtual reality expe- riences that fully embody the essence of global warming, as it is intrinsically an hyperobject – a term I take from Timothy Morton’s philosophical approach towards environmental issues. In this framework, the purpose of my essay is to uncover the impossibility to represent global warming faithfully if we keep on conceive immersive experiences in the way we are doing now. What I propose is a radical change in our idea of virtual reality when it comes to represent global warming.

References
  1. Ahn, S.J., Bailenson, J.N., Park, D., “Short- and Long-Term Effects of Embodied Experiences in Immersive Virtual Environments on Environmental Locus Of Control And Behavior,” Computers in Human Behavior, no. 39 (2014): 235-245, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.025.
  2. Ahn, S.J., et al., “Experiencing nature: Embodying animals in immersive virtual environments increases inclusion of nature in self and involvement with nature,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 21, no. 6 (2016): 399–419, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12173.
  3. Albright, A.L., Huybers, P., “Painting by Turner and Monet Depict Trends in the 19th Century Air Pollution,” PNAS 120, no. 6 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2219118120.
  4. Bédard, P., “Adventures beyond Anthropocentrism in Virtual Reality Art,” AN-ICON. Studies in Environmental Images 2 (2022): 89-112, https://doi.org/10.54103/ai/18458.
  5. Biocca, F., “The Evolution of Interactive Media: Toward ‘Being There’ in Nonlinear Narrative Worlds,” in M.C. Green, J.J. Strange, T.C. Brock, eds., Narrative Impact: Social and Cognitive Foundations (Mahwah NJ-London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 2002): 97-130.
  6. Bollmer, G., “Empathy Machines,” Media International Australia 165 (2017): 63-76, https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X17726794.
  7. Bloom, P., “It’s Ridiculous to Use Virtual Reality to Empathize with Refugees,” The Atlantic (February 3, 2017), https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/02/virtual-reality-wont-make-you-more-empathetic/515511/, accessed March 2, 2024.
  8. Chouliaraki, L., The Spectatorship of Suffering (London: Sage, 2006).
  9. Crutzen, P. J., Stoermer, E.F., “The “anthropocene”,” IGPB Newsletter, no. 41 (2000): 17-18.
  10. D’Aloia, A., “Virtually Present, Physically Invisible: Virtual Reality Immersion and Emersion in Alejandro González Iñárritu’s Carne y Arena,” Senses of Cinema (2018), https://www.sensesofcinema.com/2018/feature-articles/virtually-present-physically-invisible-virtual-reality-immersion-and-emersion-in-alejandro-gonzalez-inarritus-carne-y-arena/, accessed December 14, 2023.
  11. Fauville, G., Muller Queiroz, A.C., Bailenson, J.N., “Virtual Reality as a Promising Tool to Promote Climate Change Awareness,” in H.Y. Song, J. Kim, eds., Technology and Health. Promoting Attitude and Behaviour Change (London-San Diego-Cambridge MA-Oxford: Academic Press, 2020): 91-108, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816958-2.00005-8.
  12. Goldfarb, B., “How Do You Make a Movie about a Hyperobject?,” High Country News (December 31, 2021), https://www.hcn.org/issues/54.2/climate-change-how-do-you-make-a-movie-about-a-hyperobject, accessed December 14, 2023.
  13. Grusin, R., The Nonhuman Turn (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2015).
  14. Herrera, F., et al., “Building Long-Term Empathy: A Large-Scale Comparison of Traditional and Virtual Reality Perspective-Taking,” PLoS ONE 13, no. 10 (2018): 1-37, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204494.
  15. Ijsselsteijn, A., et al., “Presence: Concept, Determinants and Measurement,” Proceedings of SPIE, Human Vision and Electronic Imaging (San Jose CA: 2000).
  16. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Sixth Assessment Report (March 20, 2023), https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/ accessed December 14, 2023.
  17. Kool, H., “The Ethics of Immersive Journalism: A Rhetorical Analysis of News Storytelling with Virtual Reality Technologies,” Intersect 9, no. 3 (2016): 1-11.
  18. Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., Whitmarsh, L., “Barriers Perceived to Engaging with Climate Change among the UK Public and their Policy Implications,” Global Environmental Change 17, no. 3-4 (2007): 445-459, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004
  19. Markowitz, D.M. et al., “Immersive Virtual Reality Field Trips Facilitate Learning about Climate Change,” Frontiers in Psychology 9, no. 2364 (2018): 1-20, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02364.
  20. Meijers, M.H.C., et al., “Experiencing Climate Change Virtually: The Effects of Virtual Reality on Climate Change Related Cognitions, Emotions, and Behavior,” Environmental Communication 17, no. 6 (2023): 581-601, https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2023.2229043.
  21. Milk, C., “How Virtual Reality Can Create the Ultimate Empathy Machine,” filmed 2015 at TED Talk, https://www.ted.com/talks/chris_milk_how_virtual_reality_can_create_the_ultimate_empathy_machine, accessed December, 9 2023.
  22. Morozov, E., The Net Delusion: How Not to Liberate the World (London: Penguin: 2011).
  23. Morton, T., The Ecological Thought (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 2010).
  24. Morton, T., Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World (Minneapolis-London: University of Minnesota Press, 2013).
  25. Nakamura, L., “Feeling Good about Feeling Bad: Virtuous Virtual Reality and the Automation of Racial Empathy,” Journal of Visual Culture 19, no. 1: 47-64 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412920906259.
  26. Nash, K., “Virtual Reality Witness: Exploring the Ethics of Mediated Presence,” Studies in Documentary Film 12, no. 2 (2018): 119-131, https://doi.org/10.1080/17503280.2017.1340796.
  27. Pinotti, A., “What Is It Like to Be a Hawk?: Inter-Specific Empathy in the Age of Immersive Virtual Environments,” in Y. Hadjinicolaou, ed., Image Practices and Falconry (Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter, 2020): 31-47.
  28. Rainoldi, G., “Face-to-Face, or Face-to-Visor: Is Cinematic Virtual Reality the ‘Ultimate Empathy Machine’?,” Bollettino Filosofico 37 (2022): 163-173.
  29. Rueda, J., Lara, F., “Virtual Reality and Empathy Enhancement: Ethical Aspects,” Frontiers in Robotics and AI 7, no. 506984 (2020): 1-18, 10.3389/frobt.2020.506984.
  30. Slater, M., Sanchez-Vives, M.V., “Enhancing Our Lives with Immersive Virtual Reality,” Frontiers in Robotics and AI 3, no. 74 (2016), 10.3389/frobt.2016.00074.
  31. Steffen, W., et al., “The Trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration,” The Anthropocene Review 2, no. 1 (2015): 81-98, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2014.11.045.
  32. Sutherland, I.E., “The Ultimate Display,” in R. Packer, K. Jordan, eds., Multimedia: From Wagner to Virtual Reality (New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.), 506-508.
  33. UN News Global perspective Human stories, “Hottest July Ever Signals ‘Era of Global Boiling Has Arrived’ Says UN Chief,” (July 7, 2023), https://news.un.org/en/story/2023/07/1139162 , accessed December 9, 2023.
  34. von Uexküll, J., A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans: With a Theory of Meaning (1934), trans. J.D. O’Neil (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2010).
  35. Waters, C.N., et al., “Can nuclear Weapons Fallout Mark the Beginning of the Anthropocene Epoch?,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 71, no. 3 (2015): 46-57, https://doi.org/10.1177/0096340215581357.
  36. Zalasiewicz, J., et al., “When Did the Anthropocene Begin? A Mid-Twentieth Century Boundary Level Is Stratigraphically Optimal,” Quaternary International 383: 196-203, 10.1016/j.quaint.2014.11.045.
Read Article
Published

31 July 2024

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54103/ai/21984
How to Cite
Magri, S. (2024). The Problem of Empathy in Immersive Experiences on Global Warming: A Matter of Empathy, Embodiment, and Hyperobjects. AN-ICON. Studies in Environmental Images [ISSN 2785-7433], 3(I), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.54103/ai/21984
Copy

Issue
Vol. 3 No. I (2024): Transformational Experiences. The Role of Immersive Arts and Media in Individual and Societal Change

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
License
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.