Thematic Section

Cringe-watching: How EduXperience’s Moralizing Does (Not) Advance Social Change

Author(s)
Keywords
  • Educational VR
  • Empathy machine
  • Gaze from above
  • Völkerschau
  • Ways of seeing
Abstract

This paper scrutinizes the deployment of immersive media, particularly, virtual reality (VR) in the context of climate change education, focusing on the case study of EduXperience Biosphere VR (2021). The analysis challenges the assumption that such technologies inherently promote desired social trans- formations, arguing that they can also perpetuate colonialist narratives and fail to provoke meaningful action. By examining the visual strategies, sound, scripts and para-texts employed in Biosphere VR’s documentaries, the paper shows how these el- ements can reinforce problematic tropes of the so-called Global South as “the frontier.” While VR holds promise for experiential learning (especially with glitches and similar unintentional ef- fects that break down the point of view), specific forms of com- munication tend to prioritize simplistic moralizing over nuanced albeit critical engagement with complex socio-environmental issues. Drawing on critical theory in visual and spatial studies, the paper calls for further approaches to the representation of climate change, globality, space, communities, places and sites that could better prioritize social justice and models of terrestrial, reciprocal interdependence.

 

References
  1. Bal, M., Double Exposures: The Subject of Cultural Analysis (London: Routledge, 1999).
  2. Barad, K., “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter,” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28, no. 3 (2003): 801-831, https://doi.org/10.1086/345321.
  3. Berger, J., Ways of Seeing (1973), BBC series, book and retrieved essays (2008), https://www.ways-of-seeing.com/, accessed May 29, 2024.
  4. Betancourt, M., Glitch Theory: Art and Semiotics (Savannah GE: I’m Press’d, 2023).
  5. Cappelletto, C., “Alfred Gell tra eccezionalismo umano e postumanesimo,” in A. Gell, Arte e agency: Una teoria antropologica, ed. C. Cappelletto, trans. G. Policastro (Milan: Raffaello Cortina, 2021).
  6. Chayka, K., “Facebook Wants Us to Live in the Metaverse: What Does That Even Mean?,” The New Yorker (August 5, 2021), https://www.newyorker.com/culture/infinite-scroll/facebook-wants-us-to-live-in-the-metaverse, accessed May 29, 2024.
  7. Chen, M., Zhang, C., Shu, Y., “GIS and Virtual Reality,” Oxford Bibliographies, 2023, https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780199874002/obo-9780199874002-0266.xml?print.
  8. Conty, A.F., “The Politics of Nature: New Materialist Responses to the Anthropocene,” Theory, Culture & Society 35, no. 7-8 (2018): 73-96, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418802891.
  9. de Certeau, M., L’invention du quotidien (Paris: Gallimard, 1990).
  10. Farinelli, F., La crisi della ragione cartografica (Turin: Einaudi, 2009).
  11. Gabrys, J., Yusoff, K., “Climate Change and the Imagination,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 2, no. 4 (2011): 516-534, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.117.
  12. Gell, A., Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).
  13. Hansen, M., Feed-Forward: On the Future of Twenty-First-Century Media (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015).
  14. Ialenti, V., Deep Time Reckoning: How Future Thinking Can Help Earth Now (Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 2020).
  15. Iovino, S., Filosofie dell’ambiente: Natura, etica, società (Rome: Carocci, 2004).
  16. Jakob, M., Il paesaggio (Bologna: Il Mulino 2009).
  17. Kemper, J., “Glitch, the Post-digital Aesthetic of Failure and Twenty-First-Century Media,” European Journal of Cultural Studies 26, no. 1 (2023): 47-63, https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494211060537.
  18. Kipling, R., “The White Man’s Burden: The United States & The Philippine Islands,” (1899), in Rudyard Kipling’s verse: Definitive edition (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1973): 323-324.
  19. Latour, B., Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2018).
  20. Le Deuff, O., “The Map: More than the Territory,” in Digital Humanities: History and Development (Hoboken NJ: Wiley, 2018): 113-122.
  21. Lefebvre, H., La production de l’espace (Paris: Gallimard, 1974).
  22. Nakamura, L., “Feeling Good about Feeling Bad: Virtuous Virtual Reality and the Automation of Racial Empathy,” Journal of Visual Culture 19, no. 1 (2020): 47-64, https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412920906259.
  23. Pinotti, A., Alla soglia dell'immagine. Da Narciso alla realtà virtuale (Turin: Einaudi, 2021).
  24. Pinotti, A., ed., Il primo libro di estetica (Turin: Einaudi, 2022).
  25. Soja, E.W., Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory (London: Verso, 1989).
  26. Stafford, B.M., Echo Objects: The Cognitive Work of Images (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2007).
  27. Tsing, A., “Unruly Edges: Mushrooms as Companion Species,” Environmental Humanities 1 (2012): 141-54.
  28. Vallega, A., La geografia del tempo (Turin: Einaudi, 2006).
  29. Wallace-Wells, D., The Uninhabitable Earth. Life after Warming (New York: Penguin, 2019).
  30. Westphal, B., La géocritique: Réel, fiction, espace (Paris: Minuit, 2007).
  31. Zucconi, F., Displacing Caravaggio: Art, Media, and Humanitarian Visual Culture (Cham: Springer, 2018).
Read Article
Published

31 July 2024

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54103/ai/22481
How to Cite
Giannuzzi, M. (2024). Cringe-watching: How EduXperience’s Moralizing Does (Not) Advance Social Change. AN-ICON. Studies in Environmental Images [ISSN 2785-7433], 3(I), 100–118. https://doi.org/10.54103/ai/22481
Copy

Issue
Vol. 3 No. I (2024): Transformational Experiences. The Role of Immersive Arts and Media in Individual and Societal Change

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
License
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.