Thematic Section

You Are Not Alone: The Role of VR and Immersive Content in Social Impact Campaigns

Author(s)
Keywords
  • Virtual reality
  • Impact production
  • Documentary
  • Social change
  • Empathy
Abstract

This article focuses on the use of virtual reality (VR) in the context of “impact campaigns.” Distinct in many ways from publishing a project on a digital storefront, im- pact campaigns assume a more carefully designed experi- ence, starting with the exhibit itself. Rather than considering VR as an end in itself, my goal is to situate this unique type of mediated experience within a larger network of social activism. Key to this project is an understanding of the role documentary films have played within societal movements. By learning from the larger history of impact production, this article seeks to highlight some of the shortcomings with VR as it has been used until now in socially minded projects. By extension, my goal is also to emphasize the things VR creators can learn from impact producers to make sure their projects reach the right audiences and affect them accordingly.

References
  1. Avenanti, A., Sirigu, A., Aglioti, S.M., “Racial Bias Reduces Empathic Sensorimotor Resonance with Other-Race Pain,” Current Biology 20, no. 11 (2010), 1018-1022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.03.071.
  2. Banakou, D., Hanumanthu, P.D., Slater, M., “Virtual Embodiment of White People in a Black Virtual Body Leads to a Sustained Reduction in Their Implicit Racial Bias,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10, no. 601 (2016), https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00601.
  3. Batson, C.D., “These Things Called Empathy: Eight Related but Distinct Phenomena,” in J. Decety, W. Ickes, eds., The Social Neuroscience of Empathy (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2009), 3-16.
  4. Bédard, P., “Closing the Gap: Storytelling in Nonfiction Virtual Reality,” Canadian Journal of Film Studies 32, no. 1 (Spring 2023), 87-105.
  5. Bédard, P., “Making Room for Empathy in Contemporary Virtual Reality Cinema,” Studies in Documentary Film 18, no. 1 (2023), 34-52.
  6. Bell, T., quoted in Poirier, P.J., “For Docs Promoting Social Change, Impact Strategies are Essential,” Now & Next (February 10, 2020), https://cmf-fmc.ca/now-next/articles/documentaries-social-change-impact-strategy/.
  7. Bertrand, P., et al., “Learning Empathy Through Virtual Reality: Multiple Strategies for Training Empathy-Related Abilities Using Body Ownership Illusions in Embodied Virtual Reality,” Frontiers in Robotics and AI 5, no. 26 (2018), https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00026.
  8. Bloom, P., Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion (New York: Ecco Press, 2016).
  9. Bollmer, G., “Empathy Machines,” Media International Australia 165, no. 1 (2017), 63-76, https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X17726794.
  10. BRITDOC, Impact Field Guide and Toolkit (2015), http://impactguide.org.
  11. Chattoo, C.B., Story Movements: How Documentaries Empower People and Inspire Social Change. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).
  12. Clark, J., Abrash, B., “Social Justice Documentary: Designing for Impact,” Center for Media and Social Impact (2011), http://www.cmsimpact.org/tags/impact/designing-impact
  13. De Rosa, M., Burgess, M., Charting a Course for Impact Producing in Canada: Trends, Best Practices and Future Directions (Toronto: The Documentary Organization of Canada, 2016).
  14. Farmer, H., “A Broken Empathy Machine,” Immerse (2019), https://immerse.news/a-broken-empathy-machine-can-virtual-reality-increase-pro-social-behaviour-and-reduce-prejudice-cbcefb30525b
  15. Finneran, P., Documentary Impact: Social Change Through Storytelling, (Toronto: StoryMatters and HotDocs), http://www.inspiritfoundation.org/files/5114/0932/8738/Hot_Docs_2014_Documentary_Impact_Report.pdf.
  16. Fisher, J.A., “Empathic Actualities: Toward a Taxonomy of Empathy in Virtual Reality,” in N. Nunes, I. Oakley, and V. Nisi, eds., Interactive Storytelling: 10th International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling (Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2017), 233-244.
  17. Friesen, T., Story Money Impact: Funding Media for Social Change (New York: Routledge, 2016).
  18. Hoffman, M.L., “The Contribution of Empathy to Justice and Moral Judgment,” in N. Eisenberg, J. Strayer, eds., Empathy and its Development. Cambridge studies in social and emotional development (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1987), 47-80.
  19. Karlin, B., Johnson, J., “Measuring Impact: The Importance of Evaluation for Documentary Film Campaigns,” M/C Journal 14, no. 6 (2011), http://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/viewArticle/444
  20. Lombard, M., Ditton, T., “At the Heart of it All: The Concept of Presence,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3, no. 2 (1997), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x.
  21. Meyerbröker, K., Emmelkamp, P.M.G., “Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy in Anxiety Disorders: A Systematic Review of Process-and-Outcome Studies,” Depression and Anxiety 27, no. 10 (2010), 933-944, https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20734.
  22. Miller, E., “Building Participation in the Outreach for the Documentary The Water Front,” Journal of Canadian Studies 43, no. 1 (2009), 59-86, 75, https://doi.org/10.3138/jcs.43.1.59.
  23. Nakamura, L., “Feeling Good About Feeling Bad: Virtuous Virtual Reality and the Automation of Racial Empathy,” Journal of Visual Culture 19, no. 1 (2020), 47-64, https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412920906259.
  24. Nash, K., “Virtual Reality Witness: Exploring the Ethics of Mediated Presence,” Studies in Documentary Film 12, no. 2 (2018): 119-131, 124, https://doi.org/10.1080/17503280.2017.1340796.
  25. Nash, K., Corner, J., “Strategic Impact Documentary: Contexts of Production and Social Intervention,” European Journal of Communication 31, no. 3 (2016), 227-242, https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323116635831.
  26. Notley. T., Gregory, S., Video for Change: Creating and Measuring Social Impact: A Working Paper by the Video 4 Change Network (June 2015), https://video4change.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/video4change-impact-working-paper-2015_final.pdf.
  27. Opris, D., et al., “Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy in Anxiety Disorders: A Quantitative Meta-Analysis,” Depression and Anxiety 29, no. 2 (2012), 85-93, https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20910.
  28. Parsons, T.D., Rizzo, A.A., “Affective Outcomes of Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy for Anxiety and Specific Phobias: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 39, no. 3 (2008), 250-261, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2007.07.007.
  29. Plass, J., et al., Deepening Engagement and Learning Impact Through Virtual Reality Activations (New York: Games for Change, 2023). https://www.gamesforchange.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Deepening-Engagement-and-Learning-Impact-through-Virtual-Reality-Activations.pdf
  30. Ramirez, E., “Empathy and the Limits of Thought Experiments,” Metaphilosophy 48, no. (2017), 504-526, https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12249.
  31. Raz, G., “Rage Against the Empathy Machine Revisited: The Ethics of Empathy-Related Affordances of Virtual Reality,” Convergence 28, no. 5 (2022): 1457-1475, https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565221086406.
  32. Sora-Domenjó, C. “Disrupting the ‘Empathy Machine’: The Power and Perils of Virtual Reality in Addressing Social Issues,” Frontiers in Psychology 13, no. 814565 (2022), https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.814565.
  33. Verellen, E., “From Distribution to Audience Engagement: Change through Film,” The Fledgling Fund (2010). http://www.thefledglingfund.org/resources/distribution-to-audience-engagement.
  34. Waugh, T., Show Us Life: Toward a History and Aesthetics of the Committed Documentary (Metuchen, NJ - London: The Scarecrow Press, 1984)
  35. Whiteman, D., “Out of the Theatres and into the Streets: A Coalition Model of the Political Impact of Documentary Film and Video,” Political Communication 21, no. 1 (2004), 56-69, https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600490273263-1585.