Thematic Section
Spontaneity on parole: Participation, Interactivity and Performative Spectatorship
Author(s)
Keywords
- interactivity
- spontaneity
- performative
- spectatorship
- participation art
Abstract
In recent years, participation and interactivity have become two key words in the vocabulary of art criticism. It is not by chance that both these models insist on a form of performative spectatorship, based essentially on three concepts: presentness, immediateness and unframedness. The challenge posed by this type of spectatorship concerns a fundamental concept for aesthetics (already with Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgment), and that is that of spontaneity. In fact, the creation of an “unframed” space and an immediate experience precisely at increasing the “spontaneity effect,” fuelled by the active involvement of a spectator “immersed” physically (and emotionally) within an environment/work that is programmed to welcome and receive its intervention. Except that spontaneity is, by definition, something that cannot be achieved if sought intentionally. This is precisely the challenge posed by interactivity.
References
- Bishop, C., “Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics,” October 110 (2004): 51-79, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3397557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/0162287042379810
- Bishop, C., Artificial Hells. Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship (London-New York: Verso, 2012).
- D’Ammando, A., Natale, F., eds., “Estetica e partecipazione. Prospettive critiche su arte, politica e spettatorialità,” Pólemos. Materiali di filosofia e critica sociale. no. 2 (2021).
- D’Angelo, P., La tirannia delle emozioni (Bologna: il Mulino, 2020).
- Fischer-Lichte, E., The Transformative Power of Performance: A New Aesthetics (London-New York: Routledge, 2008). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203894989
- Foster, H., “Chat Rooms,” in C. Bishop, ed., Participation, (London-Cambridge MA: Whitechapel-MIT Press, 2006): 190-195.
- Foster, H., Bad New Days: Art, Criticism, Emergency (London-New York: Verso, 2015).
- Garroni, E., Estetica. Uno sguardo-attraverso (Rome: Castelvecchi, 2020).
- Garroni, E., Kant and the Bestimmungsgrund/’Principle of Determination’ of the Aesthetic Judgement (1989), trans. H. Hohenegger, S. Velotti, in Schlüter, G., Hohenegger, H., eds., Kants Schriften in Übersetzungen (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2020): 491-502.
- Kant, I., Critique of the Power of Judgment (1790), trans. P. Guyer, E. Matthews (Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804656
- Kester, G.H., “Variations on a Theme: Consensus and Dissensus in Contemporary Participatory Art,” in D’Ammando, A., Natale, F., eds., “Estetica e partecipazione. Prospettive critiche su arte, politica e spettatorialità,” Pólemos. Materiali di filosofia e critica sociale, no. 2 (2021): 19-32.
- Kester, G.H., Conversation Pieces: Community and Communication in Modern Art (Berkeley-Los Angeles-London: University of California Press 2004).
- Modena, E., Immersioni. La realtà virtuale nelle mani degli artisti (Milan: Johan & Levi, 2023).
- Montani, P., Bioestetica. Senso comune, tecnica e arte nell’età della globalizzazione (Rome: Carocci, 2007).
- Montani, P., Tecnologie della sensibilità. Estetica e immaginazione interattiva (Milan: Cortina, 2014).
- Noë, A., Strange Tools (New York: Hill and Wang, 2015).
- Penzin, “The Soviets of the Multitude: On Collectivity and Collective Work: an Interview with Paolo Virno,” Mediations, no. 1 (2010): 81-92.
- Pinotti, A., Alla soglia dell’immagine. Da Narciso alla realtà virtuale (Turin: Einaudi, 2021).
- Velotti, S., The Conundrum of Control: Making Sense through Artistic Practices (Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004694279
Published
30 December 2024
How to Cite
Downloads
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.