Thematic Section

Come On In: Virtual Reality Beyond the Headset

Author(s)

  • Agnese Cebere

    University of Oregon

Keywords
  • Spectatorship
  • Embodied simulation
  • Neuroplasticity
  • Virtual Reality
  • Interactive Art
Abstract

In this paper I consider embodiment, spectatorship, and virtuality as they relate to aesthetic experience and how they can be understood through the interactive installation, Come On In (2020) by dancer, choreographer, and director Faye Driscoll. I argue that virtual reality need not include the use of VR technologies such as headsets, but rather that it is a mode of experience that blurs the boundary between fact and fiction through what Vittorio Gallese calls “embodied simulation.” In Driscoll’s installation, the visitor’s body is used to channel and enact the performance as they are seated or reclined while listening to a kind of guided meditation through headphones. The reclined body then, does not have to be viewed as passive, but rather as facilitating an embodied experience, a claim that is supported by Jacques Rancière’s theory of the emancipated spectator. Further, I look at vulnerability as a condition of cognition (made literal in the reclined body) through David Bates’s historical analysis of the evolution of artificial intelligence, linking the plasticity of cognition with the conception of embodied simulation and immersive experience, to point to the liberatory potential of art.

References
  1. “Come On In,” Walker Art Center, www.walkerart.org/magazine/faye-driscoll-come-on-in-online, accessed July 15, 2024.
  2. “Faye Driscoll in Conversation with Philip Bither,” Walker Reader (May 22, 2020), www.walkerart.org/magazine/faye-driscoll-in-conversation-with-philip-bither, accessed July 15, 2024.
  3. “Faye Driscoll: Come On In,” Walker Art Center, www.walkerart.org/calendar/2020/faye-driscoll-come-on-in, accessed July 15, 2024.
  4. Bates, D., “Automaticity, Plasticity, and the Deviant Origins of Artificial Intelligence,” in D. Bates, N. Bassiri, eds., Plasticity and Pathology: On the Formation of the Neural Subject, (New York: Fordham University Press, 2015): 194-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823266135.003.0007
  5. Bishop, C., “Introduction: Viewers as Producers,” in C. Bishop, ed., Participation (Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 2006): 10-16.
  6. Bollmer, G., Guinness, K., “Empathy and nausea: virtual reality and Jordan Wolfson’s Real Violence,” Journal of Visual Culture 19, no. 1 (2020): 28-46, https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412920906261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412920906261
  7. Carter, M., Egliston, B., Fantasies of Virtual Reality (Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/14673.001.0001
  8. Dokic, J., Martin, J-R., “Felt Reality and the Opacity of Perception,” Topoi 36, no. 2 (2015): 299-309, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-015-9327-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-015-9327-2
  9. Driscoll, F., “Come On In,” https://dialogues.page.link/come-on-in-transcript, accessed July 15, 2024.
  10. Driscoll, F., “Works: Come On In, 2020,” https://www.fayedriscoll.com/performances-exhibitions/come-on-in, accessed July 15, 2024.
  11. Felton-Dansky, M., “The Stakes of Contact: Faye Driscoll’s Thank You For Coming: Space & Come On In,” Walker Reader, 26 May, 2020, http://www.walkerart.org/magazine/the-stakes-of-contact-faye-driscolls-thank-you-for-coming-space-and-come-on-in, accessed November 10, 2024.
  12. Gallese et al., “Mirror Neuron Forum,” Perspectives on Psychological Science 6, no. 4 (2011): 369-407, https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611413392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611413392
  13. Gallese, V., “Embodied Simulation. Its Bearing on Aesthetic Experience and the Dialogue Between Neuroscience and the Humanities,” Gestalt Theory 41, no, 2 (2019): 113-127, https://doi.org/10.2478/gth-2019-0013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/gth-2019-0013
  14. Gallese, V., “Visions of the Body. Embodied Simulation and Aesthetic Experience,” Aisthesis, vol. 10, no. 1 (2017): 41-50, https://doi.org/10.13128/Aisthesis-20902.
  15. Gell, A., Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198280132.001.0001
  16. Hayles, N. K., “Flesh and Metal: Reconfiguring the Mindbody in Virtual Environments.” Configurations 10, no. 2 (Spring 2002): 297-320, https://doi.org/10.1353/con.2003.0015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/con.2003.0015
  17. Heyes, C., Catmur, C., “What Happened to Mirror Neurons?” Perspectives on Psychological Science 17, no. 1 (2022): 153–168, https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691621990638. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691621990638
  18. Krafcik, H., “Faye Driscoll’s ‘Come on In’ at PICA: A personal review,” Oregon Arts Watch, December 1, 2021, https://www.orartswatch.org/faye-driscolls-come-on-in-at-pica-a-personal-review/, accessed November 15, 2024.
  19. Massumi, B., “Art of the Relational Body,” in Martin, D., ed., Mirror-Touch Synaesthesia: Thresholds of Empathy with Art (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018): 191-205.
  20. Mondloch, K., “Pour Your Body Out: On Visual and Other Pleasures in Pipilotti Rist,” Feminist Media Studies 10, no. 2 (2010): 231-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680771003690777. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14680771003690777
  21. Murray, J.H., “Virtual/Reality: How to Tell the Difference.” Journal of Visual Culture 19, no. 1 (2020): 11-27, https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412920906253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412920906253
  22. Nakamura, L., “Feeling Good about Feeling Bad: Virtuous Virtual Reality and the Automation of Racial Empathy,” Journal of Visual Culture 19, no. 1, (2020): 47-64, https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412920906259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412920906259
  23. Noë, A., The Entanglement: How Art and Philosophy Make Us What We Are (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691239293
  24. Polanyi, M., Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy (1958) (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2015). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226232768.001.0001
  25. Polanyi, M., The Tacit Dimension (Garden City NY: Anchor Books, 1967)
  26. Rancière, J., “The Emancipated Spectator,” Artforum International 45, no. 7 (2007): 270-280.
  27. Tavinor, G., “The Aesthetics of Virtual Reality (Routledge, 2022),” interview by Pierre d’Alancaisez, New Books in Art, New Books Network (NBn), January 28, 2022, https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-aesthetics-of-virtual-reality, accessed July 15, 2024.
  28. Tavinor, G., The Aesthetics of Virtual Reality (New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003107644
  29. Taylor, JM., “Mirror Neurons After a Quarter Century: New light, new cracks,” Harvard University blog, https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2016/mirror-neurons-quarter-century-new-light-new-cracks/, accessed July 15, 2024.
Read Article
Published

30 December 2024

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54103/ai/24086
How to Cite
Cebere, A. (2024). Come On In: Virtual Reality Beyond the Headset. AN-ICON. Studies in Environmental Images [ISSN 2785-7433], 3(II), 72–96. https://doi.org/10.54103/ai/24086
Copy

Issue
Vol. 3 No. II (2024): Liberty on Parole? Challenges in Interactivity

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
License
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.