Salta al menu principale di navigazione Salta al contenuto principale Salta al piè di pagina del sito
header

Saggi per la call-sezione sottoposta a peer review

N. 10 (2025): Miscellanea III

OTT platforms as heterotopic media environments. Cultural implications of the disempowerment of audiences: Cultural implications of the disempowerment of audiences

DOI
https://doi.org/10.54103/connessioni/30114
Inviata
novembre 11, 2025
Pubblicato
2026-01-15

Abstract

Questo studio si propone di indagare il progressivo deterioramento della natura bottom-up di Internet e le sue conseguenze culturali e politiche, affrontando il tema delle piattaforme OTT attraverso la nozione di eterotopia. Questo approccio si fonda sull’idea foucaultiana di uno spazio connesso a tutti gli altri spazi in modo tale da sospendere, neutralizzare o invertire le relazioni che essi definiscono. Inoltre, incorpora l’applicazione di Burgin di questo concetto agli studi sui media, descrivendo come film o frammenti cinematografici spostati e circolanti in diversi spazi mediatici portino con sé la loro specifica temporalità. Da questa prospettiva, le piattaforme OTT possono essere analizzate in quanto ambienti mediali eterotopici per due ragioni principali. In primo luogo, esse incorporano contenuti provenienti dal cinema e dalla televisione, creando uno spazio in cui anche gli artefatti “nativi” della piattaforma – gli Originals – sono comunque derivati da contesti mediali. In secondo luogo, le OTT riproducono dinamiche tipiche dei media tradizionali all’interno del web, reintegrando abitudini di fruizione legate al contesto del broadcasting e impedendo un’interazione esplicita sia con i contenuti sia tra gli utenti. Se si confronta questo scenario con modelli alternativi, in particolare le architetture p2p, emergono chiare conseguenze per il ruolo culturale del pubblico. Infatti, all’interno di queste eterotopie, gli utenti sono relegati al ruolo di consumatori passivi, esclusi dai processi che contribuiscono alla costruzione della cultura, in quanto non fanno parte di una struttura che consente loro di determinare cosa meriti di essere diffuso e conservato.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. Adorno T. W. and Horkheimer M., Dialectic of Enlightenment. Philosophical Fragments, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 2002.
  2. Adorno T. W., and Rabinbach A. G., Culture Industry Reconsidered, in «New German Critique», n. 6, 1975.
  3. Amatriain X. e Basilico J., Netflix Recommendations: Beyond the 5 Stars (Part 1), in «Netflix Technology Blog», 6 aprile 2012, in https://netflixtechblog.com/netflix-recommendations-beyond-the-5-stars-part-1-55838468f429
  4. (accessed on 11/08/2025).
  5. Amatriain X. e Basilico J., Netflix Recommendations: Beyond the 5 Stars (Part 2), in «Netflix Technology Blog», 2012, in https://netflixtechblog.com/netflix-recommendations-beyond-the-5-stars-part-2-d9b96aa399f5
  6. (accessed on 11/08/2025).
  7. Arendt H., The Human Condition, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1958.
  8. Bartl M., YouTube channels, uploads and views: A statistical analysis of the past 10 years, in «Convergence», vol. 24, n. 1, 2018, pp. 16–32.
  9. Beky A., DADVSI : La SACEM se félicite du rejet de la licence globale, in «Clubic», 2006, in www.clubic.com/actualite-52977-.html
  10. (accessed on 11/08/2025).
  11. Beller J., The Cinematic Mode of Production: Attention Economy and the Society of the Spectacle, University Press of New England, Hanover and London, 2006.
  12. Boni M., Perdre pied: Le principe d’incertitude dans les séries, Rabelais, Tours, 2023.
  13. Bonini T. and Treré E., Algorithms of Resistance: The Everyday Fight against Platform Power, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2024.
  14. Brembilla P., It’s All Connected. L’evoluzione delle serie TV statunitensi, Franco Angeli, Milano, 2018.
  15. Burgin V., Possessive, Pensive and Possessed, in D. Green e J. Lowry, Stillness and Time. Photography and the Moving Images, Photoworks, Brighton, 2005.
  16. Burk D. L., Copyright and the New Materialism, in «Intellectual Property and Access to Im/Material Goods», 2015, UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2015-69.
  17. Citton Y., Ecology of Attention, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2017.
  18. Citton Y., Mediarchy, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2019.
  19. Crawford M. B., The World Beyond Your Head. On Becoming an Individual in the Age of Distraction, Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, New York, 2015.
  20. Cunningham S. and Craig D., Social Media Entertainment: The New Intersection of Hollywood and Silicon Valley, NYU Press, New York, 2019.
  21. Cuthbertson A., Streaming services now cost average user more than cable TV, report reveals, in «The Independent», 2024, in www.independent.co.uk/tech/streaming-price-cable-netflix-disney-piracy-b2499375.html
  22. (accessed on 11/08/2025).
  23. Direction générale des politiques internes – Département des politiques structurelles et de cohésion – Culture et éducation, La « redevance pour la copie privée » : une solution au téléchargement illégal ?, Bruxelles, 2011.
  24. Einwächter S. e Jensen T., Exploring Viewers’ Experiences of ‘Series Fatigue’, in «Fandom | Cultures | Research Online Journal for Fan and Audience Studies», vol. 1, n. 1, 2024, pp. 106–122.
  25. Ek D., $2 Billion and Counting, in «Spotify for Artists», 2014, in www.artists.spotify.com/en/blog/2-billion-and-counting
  26. (accessed on 11/08/2025).
  27. Elleström L., Media, Modalities and Modes, in L. Elleström, Media Borders, Multimodality and Intermediality, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2010, pp. 11–48.
  28. EUIPO, Online Copyright Infringement in the European Union. Title-Level Study: Film, Music and TV, December 2020, in https://euipo.europa.eu/tunnel-web/secure/webdav/guest/document_library/observatory/documents/reports/2020_Online_Copyright_Infringement/2020_Online_Copyright_Infringement_in_the_EU_Title_Level_Study_FullR_en.pdf
  29. (accessed on 12/08/2025).
  30. Finn E., What Algorithms Want: Imagination in the Age of Computing, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2018.
  31. Foucault M. e Miskowiec J., Of Other Spaces, in «Diacritics», vol. 16, n. 1, 1986, pp. 22–27.
  32. Foucault M., Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, Vintage Books, New York, 1977.
  33. Fuchs C., Social Media: A Critical Introduction, SAGE, Londra, 2014.
  34. Hall S., Cultural Studies: Two Paradigms, in «Media, Culture and Society», vol. 2, n. 1, 1980b, pp. 57–72.
  35. Hall S., Encoding/Decoding, in S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Love e P. Willis, Culture, Media, Language, Hutchinson, Londra, 1980a, pp. 128–138.
  36. Hall S., Segal L. e Osborne P., Stuart Hall: Culture and Power, in «Radical Philosophy», n. 086, novembre/dicembre 1997, pp. 24–41.
  37. Hall S., The Problem of Ideology: Marxism Without Guarantees, in B. Matthews, Marx: 100 Years On, Lawrence & Wishart, Londra, 1983, pp. 57–84.
  38. Hall S., The Rediscovery of “Ideology”: Return of the Repressed in Media Studies, in T. Gurevitch, M. Bennet, J. Curran e J. Woollacott, Culture, Society and the Media, Methuen, Londra, 1982, pp. 56–90.
  39. Hall S., The Work of Representation, in S. Hall, Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices, Sage, Londra, 1997, pp. 13–74.
  40. Herbert D., Lotz A. D. and Marshall L., Approaching Media Industries Comparatively: A Case Study of Streaming, in «International Journal of Cultural Studies», vol. 22, n. 3, 2018, pp. 349–366.
  41. Horowitz B., Creators, Synthesizers, and Consumers, in «Elatable», 2006, in https://web.archive.org/web/20100303180919/http://blog.elatable.com/2006/02/creators-synthesizers-and-consumers.html
  42. (accessed on 12/08/2025).
  43. Iványi M., Social Media as the Accelerator of Neoliberal Subjectivation and an Entrepreneurial Influencer Self among Youth?—The Hungarian Theater, in «Journal. Media», 2023, pp. 648–664.
  44. Jenkins H., Convergence Culture, New York University Press, New York, 2006.
  45. Jenkins H., Ford S. and Green J., Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture, NYU Press, New York, 2013.
  46. Jenner M., Netflix and the Re-invention of Television, Springer International Publishing (Palgrave Macmillan imprint), Cham, 2018.
  47. Jin D., Global Political Economy, Platforms, and Media Industries, in «Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication», 2024, in www.oxfordre.com/communication/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-1530
  48. (accessed on 11/08/2025).
  49. Knoche M., Capitalisation of the Media Industry from a Political Economy Perspective, in «tripleC», vol. 19, n. 2, 2021, pp. 325–342.
  50. Knoche M., Media Concentration: A Critical Political Economy Perspective, in «tripleC», vol. 19, n. 2, 2021, pp. 371–391.
  51. Lausson J., Licence globale : la SPPF et l’UPFI jugent la proposition d’Aubry irréaliste, in «Numerama», 2011, in www.numerama.com/politique/19766-licence-globale-la-sppf-et-l-upfi-jugent-la-proposition-d-aubry-irrealiste.html
  52. (accessed on 11/08/2025).
  53. Lefebvre H., The Production of Space, Blackwell, Oxford, 1991.
  54. Lobato R., Netflix Nations: The Geography of Digital Distribution, New York University Press, New York, 2019.
  55. Lopes da Silva A., “Are You Still Watching?” Technicity, Temporality, and Excess in Streaming Consumption, in «Journal of Digital Media & Interaction», vol. 3, n. 8, 2020, pp. 7–18.
  56. Lotz A. D., Portals: A Treatise on Internet-Distributed Television, Michigan Publishing, East Lansing, 2017.
  57. Manovich L., Software culture, Edizioni Olivares, Milano, 2010.
  58. Manovich L., Software Takes Command, Bloomsbury Academic, New York, 2013.
  59. Marx K., Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Volume I, Penguin Classics, London, 1992.
  60. McEnroe T., Three Community Myths Busted – Goodbye 90-9-1 Rule, in «The Community Roundtable», 2016, in https://communityroundtable.com/state-of-community-management/three-community-myths-busted/?ref=blog.discourse.org
  61. (accessed on 12/08/2025).
  62. McLuhan M., The Invisible Environment: The Future of an Erosion, in «Perspecta», vol. 11, 1967, pp. 161–167.
  63. McLuhan M., The Relation of Environment to Anti-Environment, in F. Matson e A. Montagu, The Human Dialogue: Perspectives on Communication, Free Press, New York, 1967, pp. 39–47.
  64. McNair H., How We Know the 90-9-1 Rule for Online Community Engagement is Officially Outdated, in «Higher Logic», 2020, in https://www.higherlogic.com/blog/90-9-1-rule-online-community-engagement-data/
  65. (accessed on 12/08/2025).
  66. Merleau-Ponty M., Phenomenology of Perception, Routledge, London–New York, 1962.
  67. Milner R. M., The World Made Meme: Public Conversations and Participatory Media, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2016.
  68. Mittell J., Complex TV: The Poetics of Contemporary Television Storytelling, New York University Press, New York, 2015.
  69. Mosco V., The Political Economy of Communication, SAGE, Londra, 2009.
  70. Musiani F. e Shaffer V., Le modèle internet en question (années 1970–2010), in «Flux», vol. 85–86, n. 3, 2011, pp. 62–71.
  71. Musiani F., Caring About the Plumbing: On the Importance of Architectures in Social Studies of (P2p) Technology, in «Journal of Peer Production», 2012, pp. 1–8.
  72. MUSO, 2024 Piracy Trends and Insights, 2024, in https://6347345.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/6347345/MUSO%202024%20Piracy%20Trends%20and%20Insights.pdf
  73. (accessed on 11/08/2025).
  74. Nielsen J., The 90-9-1 Rule for Participation Inequality in Social Media and Online Communities, in «Nielsen Norman Group», 2006, in https://www.nngroup.com/articles/participation-inequality/
  75. (accessed on 13/08/2025).
  76. Parikka J., Media Ecologies and Imaginary Media: Transversal Expansions, Contractions, and Foldings, in «The Fibreculture Journal», n. 17, 2011, pp. 34–50.
  77. Pescatore G., Profilazione algoritmica e neogeneralismo: il paradosso della personalizzazione dei media nell’era delle piattaforme di streaming, in «Sociologia della Comunicazione», vol. 66, n. 2, 2023, pp. 21–41.
  78. Poell T., Nieborg D. and Duffy B. E., Platforms and Cultural Production, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2021.
  79. Postman N., Teaching as a Conserving Activity, Delacorte Press, New York, 1979.
  80. Postman N., The Humanism of Media Ecology, in «Proceedings of the Media Ecology Association», vol. 1, 2000, pp. 10–16.
  81. Procter J., Stuart Hall, Routledge, Londra, 2024.
  82. Prosperi G., Il ventennio pirata. P2P, file sharing e distribuzione informale degli audiovisivi in Italia, Cue Press, Imola, 2024.
  83. Raphael R., Netflix CEO Reed Hastings: Sleep is Our Competition, in «Fast Company», 2017, in www.fastcompany.com/40491939/netflix-ceo-reed-hastings-sleep-is-our-competition
  84. (accessed on 11/08/2025).
  85. Ren J., Dong H., Popovic A., Sabnis G. e Nickerson J., Digital Platforms in the News Industry: How Social Media Platforms Impact Traditional Media News Viewership, in «European Journal of Information Systems», vol. 33, n. 1, 2022, pp. 1–18.
  86. Roberts J. M., Social Media and the Neoliberal Subject, in J. M. Roberts, New Media and Public Activism: Neoliberalism, the State and Radical Protest in the Public Sphere, Bristol University Press, Bristol, 2014, pp. 93–112.
  87. SANDVINE, The Global Internet Phenomena Report, October 2018, in https://www.sandvine.com/hubfs/downloads/phenomena/2018-phenomena-report.pdf
  88. (accessed on 11/08/2025).
  89. Shifman L., Memes in Digital Culture, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2013.
  90. Shifman L., The Cultural Logic of Photo-Based Meme Genres, in «Journal of Visual Culture», vol. 13, n. 3, 2014, pp. 340–358.
  91. Simon H. A., Designing Organization for an Information-Rich World, in M. Greenberger, Computers, Communications, and the Public Interest, The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, MD, 1971.
  92. Smith J. E. H., The Internet Is Not What You Think It Is: A History, a Philosophy, a Warning, Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford, 2022.
  93. Spotify and Universal Music Group Announce Global, Multi-Year License Agreement, in «Universal Music Group News», 4 aprile 2017, in www.universalmusic.com/spotify-and-universal-music-group-announce-global-multi-year-license-agreement/
  94. (accessed on 11/08/2025).
  95. Srnicek N., Platform Capitalism, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2017.
  96. Stiegler B., Symbolic Misery, Volume 1: The Hyper-Industrial Epoch, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2014.
  97. UFPI, Dossier de presse du MIDEM. L’urgence d’un plan de développement pour relancer la croissance de la filière musicale, 2013.
  98. Universal Music Group and Spotify Strike a New Multiyear Agreement, in «Newsroom Spotify», 2025, in www.newsroom.spotify.com/2025-01-26/universal-music-group-spotify-expansion/
  99. (accessed on 11/08/2025).
  100. Van der Sar E., Top 10 Most Pirated Movies of All Time, in «TorrentFreak», 2011, in https://torrentfreak.com/top-10-most-pirated-movies-of-all-time-111012/
  101. (accessed on 12/08/2025).
  102. Van der Sar E., Top 10 Most Pirated Movies of The Week – 12/15/2025, in «TorrentFreak», 2025, in https://torrentfreak.com/top-10-most-torrented-pirated-movies/
  103. (accessed on 12/08/2025).
  104. Villani N., Spazi dell’on-demand. Le pratiche streaming tra ambienti e paesaggi mediali, in «H-ermes, J. Comm.», vol. 24, 2023, pp. 149–164.
  105. Wiggins B. E. and Bowers G. B., Memes as genre: A structurational analysis of the memescape, in «New Media & Society», vol. 17, n. 11, 2014, pp. 1886–1906.
  106. Wu T., The Attention Merchants: The Epic Scramble to Get Inside Our Heads, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 2016.
  107. Zagalo N., Engagement Design: Designing for Interaction Motivations, Springer, New York, 2020.
  108. Zuboff S., The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power, Public Affairs, New York, 2019.

Downloads

I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.