The Derridean Gaze of the “Wholly Other” in Stephen King’s “Rat”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54103/2037-2426/27054Keywords:
Stephen King, Jacques Derrida, Non-human Sentience, Enviromental Ethics, BiosemioticsAbstract
Building upon the rich theoretical framework that Derrida conceives in his posthumous environmental reflections and the interdiscipline of biosemiotics, this essay delves into the ethical questions posed by Stephen King related to other-than-human sentience, suffering, and subjecthood in “Rat.” Derrida and King generate thought-provoking portrayals of what happens when we are confronted with the gaze of the “wholly other.” When the other-than-human gaze falls upon us, Derrida and King insist that we cannot disregard the ethical summons that accompanies it. This transformative gaze compels us to think and live otherwise. The limitrophic reflection actuated by the other-than-human gaze eliminates the sharp ontological gap between humans and other animals. Owing to the strength of these encounters with other-than-human alterity, species boundaries erected on the shaky foundation of binary logic become unclear and unstable. The epiphany that the biosphere is replete with other semiotic agents that are capable of conceiving, transmitting, and decoding signs further erodes the pervasive doctrine of human exceptionalism.
Downloads
References
Aysha, Karim. “Ethical Considerations Regarding Animal Experimentation.” Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 63, no. 2, 2022, pp. E255-E256.
Belmain, Steven. “Rats Have Feelings Too.” NRI, 11 February 2022, https://www.nri.org/latest/news/2022/rats-have-feelings-too. Accessed 1 May 2024.
Benaroyo, Lazare. “The Significance of Emmanuel Levinas’ Ethics of Responsibility for Medical Judgment.” Medical Health Care Philosophy, vol. 25, no. 3, 2022, pp. 327-332.
Books, Raven. “Only True Stephen King Fans Understand the Mastery of ‘If it Bleeds.’” Medium, 11 July 2021, https://ravenbooks.medium.com/the-human-condition-as-observed-in-stephen-kings-if-it-bleeds-c66aaaeda7ff. Accessed 1 May 2024.
Brooks, Xan. “Stephen King: ‘I Have Outlived Most of My Critics. It Gives me Great Pleasure.’” The Guardian, 7 September 2019, https://www.theguardian.com/books/2019/sep/07/stephen-king-interview-the-institute. Accessed 1 July 2024.
Bruns, Gerard. “Derrida’s Cat (Who Am I?).” Research in Phenomenology, vol. 38, 2008, pp. 404-423.
Castricano, Jodey. Animal Subjects: An Ethical Reader in a Posthuman World. Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2008.
Congdon, Matthew. “Derrida and Other Animals.” Telos: A Quarterly Journal of Politics, Philosophy, Critical Theory, Culture, and the Arts, vol. 148, 2009, pp. 185-191.
Curzer, Howard, et al. “The Three Rs of Animal Research: What They Mean for the Institutional Animal Care and use Committee and Why.” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 22, no. 2, 2016, pp. 549-565.
Derrida, Jacques. The Animal That Therefore I Am. Translated by David Wills, Fordham University Press, 2008.
Derrida, Jacques. The Beast and the Sovereign. Translated by Geoffrey Bennington, vol. 1, Chicago University Press, 2009.
Derrida, Jacques. The Beast and the Sovereign. Translated by Geoffrey Bennington, vol. 2, Chicago University Press, 2011.
Diaz, Junot. “The Terrifying Prescience of Stephen King’s The Dead Zone.” Substack, 15 July 2024, https://junot.substack.com/p/the-terrifying-prescience-of-stephen. Accessed 16 July 2024.
Duffy, Caitlin. “If It Bleeds by Stephen King Review-A Return to Vintage King?” Sublime Horror, 6 January 2020, https://sublimehorror.com/books/if-it-bleeds-by-stephen-king-review/.
Egan, James. “Apocalyptism in the Fiction of Stephen King.” Extrapolation, vol. 25, no. 3, 1984, pp. 214-227.
Egerer, Claudia. “The Speaking Animal Speaking the Animal: Three Turning Points in Thinking the Animal.” Turning Points: Concepts and Narratives of Change in Literature and Other Media, edited by Ansgar Nünning and Kai Marcel Sicks. De Gruyter, 2012, pp. 437-452.
Garnier, Marie-Dominique. “Animal Writes: Derrida’s Que Donc and Other Tails.” Demenageries, 35, 2011, pp. 23-40.
Harding, Wendy, and Jacky Martin. “Oscar, Derrida’s Cat, and Other Knowing Animals.” Transatlantica, vol. 2, 2011, pp. 1-17.
Hsieh, Gin C. et al. “H4 Receptor Antagonism Exhibits Anti-nociceptive Effects in Inflammatory and Neuropathic Pain Models in Rats.” Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, vol. 95, no. 1, 2010, pp. 41-50.
Hurst, Andrea. “This Auto-bio-graphical Animal That I Am.” Journal of Literary Studies, vol. 23, no. 2, 2007, pp. 118-147.
Iveson, Richard. Zoogenesis: Thinking Encounter with Animals. Pavement Books, 2014.
Keim, Brandon. “The Intriguing New Science That Could Change Your Mind About Rats.” Wired, 28 January 2015, https://www.wired.com/2015/01/reconsider-the-rat. Accessed 1 May 2024.
King, Stephen. If it Bleeds. Scribner, 2020.
Kleinhans, Belinda. “Posthuman Ethics, Violence, Creaturely Suffering and the (Other) Animal: Schnurre’s Postwar Animal Stories.” Humanities, vol. 5, 2016, pp. 1-19.
Kull, Kalevi. “Chapter 7: Biosemiotics and Biophysics-The Fundamental Approaches to the Study of Life.” Introduction to Biosemiotics: The New Biological Synthesis, edited by Marcello Barbieri. Springer, 2007, pp. 167-177.
Lawlor, Leonard. “Animals Have No Hand.” The New Centennial Review, vol. 7, no. 2, 2007, pp. 43-69.
Maran, Timo. “Semiotization of Matter: A Hybrid Zone between Biosemiotics and Material Ecocriticism.” Material Ecocriticism. Eds. by Serenella Iovino and Serpil Oppermann, Indiana University Press, 2014, pp. 141-154.
McRobert, Neil. “For Stephen King, As Well as His Fans, If it Bleeds is a Coming Home.” Slant, 18 May 2020, https://www.slantmagazine.com/books/review-for-stephen-king-and-readers-if-it-bleeds-is-a-coming-home/. Accessed 10 July 2024.
Michaud, Ginette. “On a Serpentine Note.” Critical Studies, no. 35, 2011, pp. 41-72.
Naas, Michael. “Derrida’s Flair (For the Animals to Follow…).” Research in Phenomenology, vol. 40, 2010, pp. 219-242.
Nash, Richard. “Joy and Pity: Reading Animal Bodies in Late Eighteenth-Century Culture.” The Eighteenth Century, vol. 52, no.1, 2011, pp. 47-67.
Oliver, Kelly. “Sexual Difference, Animal Difference: Derrida and Difference ‘Worthy of Its Name.’” Hypatia, vol. 24, no. 2, 2009, pp. 54-76.
Peterson, Christopher. “The Monolingualism of the Human.” SubStance vol. 43, no. 2, 2014, pp. 83-99.
Reszitnyk, Andrew. “Eyes Through Oil: Witnessing the Nonhuman Victims of the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill.” Environmental Philosophy, vol. 9, no.2, 2012, pp. 143-157.
Schweinfurth, Manon. “The Social Life of Norway Rats (Rattus Norvegicus).” ELife, vol. 9, 2020, pp. 1-26.
Sharov, Alexei, Timo Maran, and Morten Tønnessen. “Comprehending the Semiosis of Evolution.” Biosemiotics, vol. 9, no. 1, 2016, pp. 1-6.
Simma, Claudia. “Ver(s): Toward a Spirituality of One’s Own.” Demenageries, vol. 35, 2011, pp. 73-96.
Siniscalchi, Marcello, et al. “Communication in Dogs.” Animals, vol. 8, no. 8, 2018, pp. 1-20.
Slater, Michelle. “Rethinking Human-Animal Ontological Differences: Derrida’s ‘Animot’ and Cixous’ ‘FIPS.’” Contemporary French and Francophone Studies, vol. 16, no. 5, 2012, pp. 685-693.
Smith, Greg. “The Literary Equivalent of a Big Mac and Fries?: Academics, Moralists, and the Stephen King Phenomenon.” Midwest Quarterly, vol. 43, no. 4, 2002, pp. 329-345.
Spencer, Geoff. “Scientists Compare Rat Genome with Human, Mouse.” NIH News Release, 31 March 2004. https://www.genome.gov/11511308/2004-release-scientists-compare-rat-Genome. Accessed 1 May 2024.
Tozzi, Chiara. “From Horror to Ethical Responsibility: Carl Gustav Jung and Stephen King Encounter the Dark Half Within Us and in the World.” Journal of Analytical Psychology, vol. 65, no. 1, 2020, pp. 219-234.
Wadiwel, Dinesh. “The Will for Self-Preservation: Locke and Derrida on Dominion, Property and Animals.” SubStance, vol. 43, no. 2, 2014, pp. 148-161.
Walton, Marsha. “Mice, Men Share 99 Percent of Genes.” CNN, 4 December 2022, https://edition.cnn.com/2002/TECH/science/12/04/coolsc.coolsc.mousegenome/#:~:text=%22About%2099%20percent%20of%20genes,whose%20genome%20has%20been%20sequenced. Accessed 1 May 2024.
Westling, Louise. “Still Anthropocentric.” Rev. of Berger, Anne Emmanuelle, and Marta Segarra (eds.). Demenageries: Thinking (of) Animals after Derrida, Rodopi, 2011, New Formations, vol. 78, 2013, pp. 198-201.
Wheeler, Wendy. “Postscript on Biosemiotics: Reading Beyond Words-And Ecocriticism.” New Formations, vol. 64, 2008, pp. 137-154.
Wood, David. “Derrida Vert?” The Oxford Literary Review, vol. 36, no. 2, 2014, pp. 319-322.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Except where otherwise noted, the content of this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License.
Accepted 2025-06-18
Published 2025-08-07
