Ricœur, la scienza, il mythos

Authors

  • Anna Clara Bova Università di Bari

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13130/2037-2426/3525

Keywords:

Scienza, mito, letteratura, intreccio, ermeneutica

Abstract

By following the perspective whereby mythos and symbol offer the first linguistic medium for a confused and inarticulate experience, Ricœur  steers clear not only from natural science, but also from human science and semiotics, to foster a humanist conception that relies on an hermeneutics of form and texts received from tradition.

References

Damasio, Antonio Rosa. L’errore di Cartesio. Milano: Adelphi, 1997. Stampa.

Ricœur, Paul. Il male. Milano: Morcelliana, 1993. Stampa.

---. La natura e la regola. Trad. Marianna Basile. Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 1999. Stampa.

---. Sé come un altro. Milano: Jaca Book, 1993. Stampa.

---. Paul. Tempo e racconto I. Milano: Jaca Book, 1986. Stampa.

Downloads

Published

2013-12-19

How to Cite

Bova, A. C. (2013). Ricœur, la scienza, il mythos. ENTHYMEMA, (9), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.13130/2037-2426/3525

Issue

No. 9 (2013)

Section

Modi dei discorsi: letteratura, filosofia, mito, storiografia

License

Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise noted, the content of this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License.