Reconfiguring Citizenship: Between Ius Sanguinis and Ius Soli in Italy and the United States
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54103/milanlawreview/30257Keywords:
birthright citizenship, ius soli, ius sanguinis, Fourteenth Amendment, citizenship reformAbstract
This essay examines the current reshaping of birthright citizenship by comparing the divergent paths of Italy and the United States. Historically dominated by ius sanguinis, Western legal traditions maintained a blood-based criterion for centuries; yet both countries now display signs of structural change. Italy, long committed to unlimited transmission of citizenship abroad, has recently restricted the reach of ius sanguinis through Decree-Law No. 36/2025, signalling growing concern over citizens with no effective ties to the Republic. Conversely, in the United States – traditionally the strongest ius soli jurisdiction – President Trump’s 2025 Executive Order introduces a restrictive reading of the Fourteenth Amendment, excluding from birthright citizenship the children of certain non-citizens. The ensuing judicial conflict reveals the fragility of a doctrine once considered settled. Together, these developments show that the balance between ius soli and ius sanguinis is undergoing a significant reconfiguration, whose long-term implications for political membership remain uncertain.
Downloads
References
A. Baraggia, D. Camoni, Gli ‘Executive Orders’ nella seconda Presidenza Trump: verso un nuovo equilibrio nella separazione dei poteri?, in Diritto Pubblico Comparato ed Europeo, 2025, vol. 27, n. 2, p. 241-270.
M. Bassini, Executive orders e ruolo presidenziale: la sfida di Trump alla separazione dei poteri, in Osservatorio sulle fonti, 2025, vol. 17, n. 2, p. 9-28.
L. Gagliardi, I diritti dei Latini delle colonie sine novis colonis (con una proposta di datazione della lex Minicia), in Seminarios Complutenses de Derecho Romano, 2023, vol. 36, p. 145-166.
V. Marotta, Ius sanguinis, ius soli: una breve nota sulle radici storiche di un dibattito contemporaneo, in Periodica De Re Canonica, 2014, vol. 103, n. 4, p. 663-694.
C. Nicolet, Citoyenneté française et citoyenneté romaine: essai de mise in prospettiva, in La nozione di ‘Romano’ tra cittadinanza e universalità. Atti del II Seminario internazionale di studi storici ‘Da Roma alla terza Roma’, 21-23 aprile 1982, Università La Sapienza, Napoli, 1984, p. 145-173; also in S. Berstein, O. Rudelle (eds.), Le modèle républicain, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1992, p. 19-56.
L. Peppe, Riflessioni intorno al topos della cittadinanza. L’esperienza giuridica romana, in Annali del Seminario Giuridico dell’Università di Palermo, 2023, vol. 66, p. 293-334.
L. Peppe, Sulla cittadinanza nell’esperienza giuridica romana, in M. Bianchini, C. Lanza (eds.), Seminari ‘Giuliano Crifò’ 2018-2023, Giuffrè, Milano, 2025, p. 273-297.
J.M. Rainer, Das Römische Recht in Europa, 2ª ed., Manzsche, Vienna, 2020.
S.L. Rierson, From Dred Scott to Anchor Babies: White Supremacy and the Contemporary Assault on Birthright Citizenship, in Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 2023, vol. 38, p. 3-69.
L. Serafinelli, Un requiem per le universal injunction: Trump v. CASA, in Diritti Comparati, 15 luglio 2025.
P. Weil, Qu’est-ce qu’un Français? Histoire de la nationalité française, Gallimard, Paris, 2005.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Milan Law Review

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.


