N. 1 (2023): 1/2023
Saggi

Come si diventa dopati: Il doping tra normalità e devianza

Rosalba Altopiedi
Università degli Studi di Torino
Daniele Scarscelli
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale

Pubblicato 2023-07-25

Parole chiave

  • doping,
  • sport amatoriali,
  • tecniche di neutralizzazione,
  • devianza,
  • farmaceuticalizzazione,
  • miglioramento della performance
  • ...Più
    Meno

Abstract

Il doping viene spesso rappresentato come un fenomeno che riguarda prevalentemente “alcune mele marce” che hanno scelto di infrangere le norme. per ottenere un indebito vantaggio sugli avversari. In quest’ottica il doping è l’esito di una scelta di un attore concepito come isolato dal contesto sociale. Tuttavia, negli ultimi venti anni? la letteratura sociologica sul doping ha evidenziato come la metafora delle “mele marce” sia una semplificazione poiché le scelte individuali devono essere comprese facendo riferimento sia all’influenza più generale del contesto sociale e culturale sia a quella più specifica delle reti sociali in cui gli atleti sono collocati.
In questo saggio presentiamo i risultati di uno studio qualitativo che ha integrato una survey online sul consumo (legale e illegale) di farmaci ed integratori per migliorare le prestazioni sportive
da parte di un campione di atleti agonisti, non professionisti. Lo studio qualitativo aveva l’obiettivo di descrivere i percorsi attraverso i quali gli atleti arrivano ad utilizzare sostanze dopanti. In particolare noi eravamo interessati a comprendere se, e attraverso quali meccanismi, il doping si possa configurare come un comportamento in equilibro tra normalità e devianza. I risultati dello studio evidenziano come alcuni processi che caratterizzano la società contemporanea (quali la medicalizzazione, la farmacologizzazione, l’enfasi sulla prestazione), a cui le analisi macro-sociologiche fanno riferimento per spiegare lo sviluppo del doping nello sport moderno, plasmino anche i vocabolari motivazionali di coloro che si dopano, contribuendo a mantenere il doping in un delicato equilibro tra devianza e convenzione.

Downloads

I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. Abraham, J., (2009), Partial progress: Governing the pharmaceutical industry and the NHS, 1948-2008, Journal oh Health, Politics, Law and Policy, 34, pp. 931-977. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-2009-032
  2. Altopiedi, R., Scarscelli, D., (2016), Lo sport in pillole, Milano, FrancoAngeli.
  3. Altopiedi, R., Scarscelli, D., (2015), Per uno sguardo sociologico al doping e alla sua regolazione: oltre la metafora delle mele marce, Sociologia del diritto, 2, pp. 137-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/SD2014-002006
  4. Bandura, A., (1997), Self-efficacy: The exercise of control, New York, W.H. Freeman and Company.
  5. Becker, H., (1987), Outsiders, Torino, Edizioni Gruppo Abele.
  6. Boardley, I. D., Grix, J., (2014), Doping in bodybuilders: a qualitative investigation of facilitative psychosocial processes, Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 6, 3, pp. 422-439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2013.766809
  7. Boardley I.D., Kavussanu, M., (2008), The Moral Disengagement in Sport Scale–Short, Journal of Sports Sciences, 26, 14, pp. 1507-1517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410802315054
  8. Boardley, I.D., Kavussanu, M., (2009), The Influence of Social Variables and Moral Disengagement on Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviours in Field Hockey and Netball, Journal of Sports Sciences, 27, 8, pp. 843-854. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410902887283
  9. Boys, A., Marsden, J., (2003), Perceived functions predict intensity of use and problems in young polysubstance users, Addiction, 98, 7, pp. 951-963. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00394.x
  10. Breivik, B., Hanstad, D.V., e Loland, S., (2009), Attitudes towards use of performance-enhancing substances and body modification techniques. A comparison between elite athletes and the general population, Sport in Society, 12, pp. 737-754. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17430430902944183
  11. Cloward, R. A., Ohlin, L. E., (1968), Teoria delle bande delinquenti in America, Roma-Bari, Laterza.
  12. Cohen, A., (1963), Ragazzi delinquenti, Milano, Feltrinelli.
  13. Cohen, P., Sas, A., (1994), Cocaine Use in Amsterdam in Non-deviant Subcultures, Addiction Research, 22, 1, pp. 71-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/16066359409005547
  14. Davis, R. W., Johnson B.D., Liberty, H., e Randolph D., (2004), Characteristics of Hidden Status among Users of Crack, Powder, Cocaine and Heroin in Central Harlem, Journal of Drug Issues, 34, 1, pp. 219-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002204260403400110
  15. Decorte, T., (2001), Drug Users’ Perceptions of Controlled and Uncontrolled Use, International Journal of Drug Policy, 12, pp. 297-320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-3959(01)00095-0
  16. della Porta, D., Vannucci, A., (1999), Un paese anormale. Come la classe politica ha perso l’occasione di mani pulite, Bari, Laterza.
  17. Donohoe, T., Johnson, N., (1986), Foul play: Drug abuse in sports, Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications.
  18. Ehrenberg, A., (1999), La fatica di essere se stessi, Torino, Einaudi.
  19. Fricker, R., (2008), Sampling methods for Web and E-mail surveys, in Fielding, N., Lee, R., e Blank, G., a cura di, The Sage handbook of online research methods, London, SAGE, pp. 195-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020055.n11
  20. Furedi, F., (2008), Il nuovo conformismo. Troppa psicologia nella vita quotidiana, Milano, Feltrinelli.
  21. Goffman, E., (1969), La vita quotidiana come rappresentazione, Bologna, il Mulino.
  22. Guttmann, A., (1978), From ritual to record, New York Haven-London, Columbia University Press.
  23. Hartnoll, R., a cura di, (1997), Handbook on snowball sampling, Strasbourg, Council of Europe.
  24. Hewson, C., Lurent, D., (2008), Research design and tools for internet research, in Fielding, N., Lee, R., e Blank, G., a cura di, The Sage handbook of online research methods, London, SAGE, pp. 59-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020055.n4
  25. Hughes, R., Coakley, J., (1991), Positive deviance among athletes: The implications of overconformity to the sport ethic, Sociology of Sport Journal, 8, 4, pp. 307-325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.8.4.307
  26. Hunt, G., Evans, K., Moloney, M., (2010), Youth drugs and night life. London-New York, Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203929414
  27. Ip, E.J., Barnett, M.J., Tenerowicz, M.J., e Perry, P.J., (2011), The anabolic 500 survey: Characteristics of male users versus nonusers of anabolic-androgenic steroids for strength training, Pharmacotherapy, 31 8, pp. 757-766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1592/phco.31.8.757
  28. Kanayama, G., Hudson, J., e Pope, H. G., (2009), Features of men with anabolic-androgenic steroid dependence: A comparison with nondependent AAS users and with AAS nonusers, Drug Alcohol Dependence, 102, 1-3, pp. 130–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.02.008
  29. Lende, D., Leonard, T., Sterk, C., e Elifson, K., (2007), Functional methamphetamine use: The insider’s perspective, Addiction Research and Theory, 15, 5, pp. 465-477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16066350701284552
  30. Lueschen, G., (1993), Doping in sport: The social structure of a deviant subculture, Sport Science Review, 2, 1, pp. 92-106.
  31. Lupton, D., (2003), Il rischio, Bologna, il Mulino.
  32. Maruna, S., Copes, H., (2005), What have we learned from five decades of neutralization research?, Crime and Justice, 32, pp. 221-320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/655355
  33. Matthews, J., Cramer, E., (2008)., Using technology to enhance qualitative research with hidden population, The Qualitative Report, 13, 2, pp. 301-315.
  34. Matza, D., (1976), Come si diventa devianti, Bologna, Il Mulino.
  35. Matza, D., Sykes, G.M., (1957), Juvenile delinquency and subterranean values, American Sociological Review, 26, pp. 712-719. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2090200
  36. Miller, P., Sønderlund, A., (2000), Using the internet to research hidden populations of illicit drug users: a review, Addiction, 105, pp. 1557-1567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02992.x
  37. Minor W., (1981), Techniques of Neutralization: a Reconceptualization and Empirical Examination, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 18, 2, pp. 295-318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002242788101800206
  38. Monaghan, L., (2001), Bodybuilders, drugs and risk, New York, Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203136522
  39. Monaghan, L., (2002), Vocabularies of motive for illicit steroid use among bodybuilders, Social Science & Medicine, 55, pp. 695-708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00195-2
  40. Paoli, L., & Donati, S., (2012), The trade in doping products and the challenges of supply reduction: An examination of Italy’s experience, Lausanne, World Anti-doping Agency. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8241-3_2
  41. Pappa, E., Kennedy, E., (2012), “It was my thought...He made it a reality”: Normalization and responsibility in athletes’ account of performance-enhancing drug use, International Review for the Sociology of Sport. [Online] Consultabile all’indirizzo https://www.doping.nl/media/kb/6811/Pappa%20et%20al%202012.pdf 30 (Data di accesso: 11 maggio 2023).
  42. Parkinson, A.B., Evans, N.A., (2006), Anabolic androgenic steroids: A survey of 500 users, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 38, 4, pp. 644-651. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000210194.56834.5d
  43. Peretti-Watel, P., (2003), Neutralization theory and the denial of risk: Some evidence from cannabis use among French adolescents, The British Journal of Sociology, 54, 1, pp. 21-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0007131032000045888
  44. Peretti-Watel, P., Guagliardo, V., Verger, P., Mignon, P., Pruvost, J., (2004), Attitudes towards doping and recreational drug use among) French elite student-athletes, Sociology of Sport Journal, 21, 1, pp. 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.21.1.1
  45. Pearson, G., (2001), Normal Drug Use, Substance Use and Misuse, 36, pp. 167-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-100000234
  46. Rhodes, T., (1997), Risk theory in epidemic times: sex, drugs and the social organisation of “risk behaviour”, Sociology of Health & Illness, 19, 2, pp. 208-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep10934410
  47. Rubington, E., Weinberg, M., (2008), Deviance. The interactionist perspective, Boston, Pearson.
  48. Scarscelli, D., (2003), Riuscire a smettere, Torino, EGA.
  49. Schwartz, H., Jacobs, J., (1979), Qualitative sociology, New York, Free Press.
  50. Scott, M.B., Lyman, S., (1968), Accounts, American Sociological Review, 33, 1, pp. 46-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2092239
  51. Sefiha, O., (2012), Bike racing, neutralization, and the social construction of performance-enhancing drug use, Contemporary Drug Problems, 39, 2, pp. 213-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009145091203900203
  52. Shewan, D., Dalgarno, P., (2005), Evidence for Controller Heroin Use? Low Levels of Negative Health and Social Outcomes among Non-treatment Heroin Users, British Journal of Healthy Psychology, 10, pp. 33-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/135910704X14582
  53. Smith C., Land C., (2014), Pharmacological Routes to Everyday Exceptionality, Culture and Organization, 20, 4, pp. 269-287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2013.851680
  54. South N., (2004), Managing Work, Hedonism and the ‘Borderline?’ between the Legal and Illegal Markets. Two Case Studies of Recreational Heavy Drug Users, Addiction Research and Theory, 12, 6, pp. 525-538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16066350412331323074
  55. Sutherland, E., (1947), Principles of criminology, Philadelphia, Lippincott.
  56. Sykes, G.M., Matza, D., (1957), Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency, American Sociological Review, 22, pp. 664-670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2089195
  57. Thualagant, N., (2012), The conceptualization of fitness doping and its limitations, Sport in Society, 15, 3, pp. 409-419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2012.653209
  58. Vidoni Guidoni, O., (2022), Come si diventa non devianti, Milano, PM Edizioni.
  59. Waddigton, I., Smith, A., (2009), An introduction to drugs in sport. Addicted to winning?, New York, Routledge.
  60. Waldorf D., Craig R., e Sheigla M., (1991), Cocaine Changes: The Experience of Using and Quitting, Philadelphia, Temple University.
  61. Warburton H., Turnbull P.J., e Hough M., (2005), Occasional and Controlled Heroin Use, London, Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
  62. Williams, S. J., Gabe, J., e Davis, P., a cura di, (2009), Pharmaceuticals and society, Chichester, Wiley-Blackwell.
  63. Wilson, S., Gilbert, K., e Edwards, A. (2004), The socio-political conservatism associated with doping and high-performance sport: A case study of an athletic squad's perspective, Journal of Exercise and Fitness, 2, 2, pp. 105-114.
  64. Wright Mills, C., (1940), Situated action and vocabularies of motives, American Sociological Review, 5, pp. 904-913. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2084524
  65. Zamperini, A., (1998), Psicologia sociale della responsabilità, Torino, Utet.
  66. Zinberg, N. E., (1984), Drug, Set, and Setting, New York, Yale University Press.