No. 1 (2025)
Digitalization between regulation and institutionalization: impact on public decision-making (edited by the Scientific Council of the AIS Section of Sociology of Law and Deviance)

Public administration and digitisation: a controversial relationship

pdf (Italiano)
Patrizia Santoro
Università degli Studi di Catania
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54103/1972-5760/28928

Published 2025-06-04

Keywords

  • discretion,
  • decision making process,
  • automation,
  • algorithm

How to Cite

Santoro, P. (2025). Public administration and digitisation: a controversial relationship. Sociologia Del Diritto, 52(1). https://doi.org/10.54103/1972-5760/28928

Copyright (c) 2025 Patrizia Santoro

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Abstract

In navigating the change imposed by new digital technologies, public administration faces significant challenges that hint at risks and critical issues the impacts of which inevitably affect the relationship with citizens. Within this framework, the article examines specific institutional aspects that contribute the debate on the relationship between law and new technologies. It focuses on automation mechanisms that could potentially overshadow the reflective nature of legal decision-making.
pdf (Italiano)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Airoldi, M., (2020), Lo spettro dell’algoritmo e le scienze sociali. Prospettive critiche su macchine intelligenti e automazione delle disuguaglianze, Polis, 35,1, pp.111-128.
  2. Alon-Barkat, S., & Busuioc, M., (2023), Human–AI interactions in public sector decision making:“automation bias” and “selective adherence” to algorithmic advice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(1), pp. 153-169.
  3. Auby, J., B., (2020), Administrative law facing digital challenges. European review of digital administration & law, 1(1-2), pp. 7-16.
  4. Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2014), ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research. Government information quarterly, 31(1), pp. 119-128.
  5. Beniger, J., (1986), Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society, London: Harvard University Press.
  6. Benjamin, R., (2019). Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Cambridge, Polity Press.
  7. Bouwmeester, M., (2023), System Failure in the Digital Welfare State: Exploring parliamentary and judicial control in the Dutch childcare benefits scandal, Recht der Werkelijkheid, 44(2), 13-37.
  8. Bucher, T., (2018), If... then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press.
  9. Burrell, J., & Fourcade, M., (2021), The society of algorithms, Annual Review of Sociology, 47, pp. 213-237.
  10. Busch, P.A., & Henriksen, H.Z., (2018), Digital discretion: A systematic literature review of ICT and street-level discretion, Information Polity, 23, 1, pp. 3-28.
  11. Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T., (2018), Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency, PMLR, pp. 77-91.
  12. Busuioc, M., (2021), Accountable artificial intelligence: Holding algorithms to account. Public administration review, 81(5), pp. 825-836.
  13. Catanzariti, M., (2020), La razionalità algoritmica dei processi decisionali, in Gozzo, S., Pennisi, C., Asero, V., Sampugnaro, R., a cura di, Big Data E Processi Decisionali Strumenti Per L'analisi Delle Decisoni Giuridiche, Politiche Economiche e Sociali, Milano, EGEA, pp. 149-165.
  14. Carloni, E., (2020), I principi della legalità algoritmica. Le decisioni automatizzate di fronte al giudice amministrativo, Diritto amministrativo, 1, pp. 273-304.
  15. Cassatella, A., (2021), La discrezionalità amministrativa nell’età digitale, in AA. VV., Diritto amministrativo: scritti per Franco Gaetano Scoca, Napoli, Editoriale Scientifica, 1, pp. 675 ss.
  16. Civitarese Matteucci, S., Torchia, L., (2016), La tecnificazione dell'amministrazione, in Civitarese Matteucci, S., Torchia, L., a cura di, La Tecnificazione, 4, Firenze, University Press, pp. 7-54.
  17. Civitarese Matteucci, S., (2019), Umano troppo umano. Decisioni amministrative automatizzate e principio di legalità, Diritto pubblico, 25, 1, pp. 5-42.
  18. Crozier, M., (1963), Le Phénomène Bureaucratique, Paris, Seuil.
  19. D’Angelosante, M., (2016), La consistenza del modello dell’amministrazione ‘invisibile’ nell’età della tecnificazione: dalla formazione delle decisioni alla responsabilità per le decisioni, in Civitarese Matteucci, S., Torchia, L., a cura di, La tecnificazione, Firenze, University Press.
  20. De Boer, N., & Raaphorst, N., (2023), Automation and discretion: explaining the effect of automation on how street-level bureaucrats enforce, Public Management Review, 25(1), pp. 42-62.
  21. European Commission, (2024), Report on the state of the Digital Decade, https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/report-state-digital-decade-2024
  22. Ferrari, V., (2020), Note socio-giuridiche introduttive per una discussione su diritto, intelligenza artificiale e big data, Sociologia del diritto, 3, pp. 9-32.
  23. Gesk, T.S., & Leyer, M., (2022), Artificial intelligence in public services: When and why citizens accept its usage, Government Information Quarterly, 39(3), 101704.
  24. McBamett, D., (1981), Conviction: Law, the State and the Construction of Justice, London, Macmillan.
  25. Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N., (2019), Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews, Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385.
  26. OECD, (2020), The OECD Digital Government Policy Framework: Six dimensions of a Digital Government. OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, OECD Publishing, October 7, No. 02. https://doi.org/10.1787/f64fed2a-en
  27. Otranto, P., (2021), Riflessioni in tema di decisione amministrativa, intelligenza artificiale e legalità, Federalismi.it, 7, pp. 187-204.
  28. Pennisi, C., (2002), Il luogo dell'azione in un mondo di regole, Sociologia del diritto, 3, pp.45-60.
  29. Pratt, A., & Sossin, L., (2009), A brief introduction of the puzzle of discretion, Canadian Journal of Law and Society/La Revue Canadienne Droit et Société, 24(3), pp. 301-312.
  30. Ranchordás, S., (2024), The Invisible Citizen in the Digital State: Administrative Law Meets Digital Constitutionalism, in European Yearbook of Constitutional Law 2023: Constitutional Law in the Digital Era, The Hague, TMC Asser Press, pp.15-40.
  31. Richardson, R., Schultz, J. M., & Crawford, K., (2019), Dirty data, bad predictions: How civil rights violations impact police data, predictive policing systems, and justice, New York University Law Review Online, 94, 15.
  32. Rouvroy, A., (2018), Homo juridicus est-il soluble dans les données?, in Degrave, É., De Terwangne, C., Dusollier, S., & Queck, R., Law, Norms and Freedom in Cyberspace – Droit, normes et libertés dans le cybermonde, Liber Amicorum Yves Poullet, Bruxelles, Larcier.
  33. Schiff, D. S., Schiff, K. J., & Pierson, P., (2022), Assessing public value failure in government adoption of artificial intelligence, Public Administration, 100(3), pp. 653-673.
  34. Crawford, K., & Schultz, J., (2019), AI systems as state actors, Columbia Law Review, 119(7), pp. 1941-1972.
  35. Usai, A., (1993), Le prospettive di automazione delle decisioni amministrative in un sistema di teleamministrazione, Il diritto dell'informazione e dell'informatica, pp. 164 ss.
  36. Weber, M., (1922), Economia e società, trad. it., Milano, Edizioni di Comunità, 1981.
  37. Wirtz, B.W., Weyerer, J.C., & Geyer, C., (2019), Artificial intelligence and the public sector—applications and challenges, International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), pp. 596-615.
  38. Zalnieriute, M., Moses, L.B., & Williams, G., (2019), The Rule of Law and Automation of Government Decision-Making, The Modern Law Review, 82(3), pp. 425-455.
  39. Zajko, M., (2022), Artificial intelligence, algorithms, and social inequality: Sociological contributions to contemporary debates, Sociology Compass, 16, 3, pp. 1-16.
  40. Zuiderveen Borgesius, F., (2018), Discrimination, artificial intelligence, and algorithmic decision-making, Council of Europe, Directorate General of Democracy, 42.