N. 2 (2025)
Dossier - Diversity and the Italian Judiciary: Challenges and Gaps (edited by C. Cavallari and A. Lacchei)

Law and Incapacitation: Empirical Insights into Mental Health Compulsory Treatments

pdf
Carolina Di Luciano
University of Turin
Michele Miravalle
University of Turin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54103/1972-5760/30766

Published 2026-02-02

Keywords

  • psychiatric care,
  • coercive treatments,
  • routine justice,
  • medical dominance,
  • mental health

How to Cite

Di Luciano, C., & Miravalle, M. (2026). Law and Incapacitation: Empirical Insights into Mental Health Compulsory Treatments. Sociologia Del Diritto, 52(2). https://doi.org/10.54103/1972-5760/30766

Copyright (c) 2025 Carolina Di Luciano, Michele Miravalle

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Compulsory Health Treatment (TSO) for mental illness constitutes the primary form of “coercive care” in Italy, as recently reaffirmed by the Constitutional Court (judgment no. 22/2022). Drawing on the work of the Observatory on TSOs in the City of Turin, this study analyzes over 1,000 case files relating to TSO procedures carried out between 2017 and 2023, including validation orders issued by both the mayor and the guardianship judge. In addition, semi-structured interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals and local police officers involved in the procedures. The findings reveal a high degree of standardization within the administrative-judicial process which, despite being formally grounded in robust legal safeguards, operates in practice as a form of routinized justice characterized by medical dominance over other institutional actors. The analysis further suggests that the TSO is increasingly embedded in a paradigm marked by a renewed emphasis on practices of social control and can be interpreted as a dispositif of incapacitation.
pdf

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Bourdieu, P., (1987), The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field, Hastings Law Journal, 38, 5, pp. 805–853.
  2. Castel, R., (1991), From dangerousness to risk, in G. Burchell, C. Gordon, P. Miller, eds., The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, pp. 281-298.
  3. Chevalier L., (1958), Classes laborieuses, classes dangereuses, Paris, Éditions de Minuit.
  4. Daly, E., (2024), Profili costituzionali dei trattamenti medico-psichiatrici, Pisa, Pacini Giuridica.
  5. Freidson, E., (2002), La dominanza medica. Le basi sociali della malattia e delle istituzioni sanitarie, Milano, Franco Angeli.
  6. Freidson, E., (2002), Professionalismo. La terza logica, R. Ioli (Trans.), Bari, Edizioni Dedalo.
  7. Foot, J., (2023), The Man Who Closed the Asylums: Franco Basaglia and the Revolution in Mental Health Care, New York, Verso Books.
  8. Hachtel, H., Vogel, T., Huber, C. G., (2019), Mandated Treatment and Its Impact on Therapeutic Process and Outcome Factors, Frontiers in psychiatry, 10, p. 219.
  9. Larroche, V., (2019), The Dispositif: A Concept for Information and Communication Sciences, Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons.
  10. Saraceno, B., (2024), Istituzioni totali e de-istituzionalizzazione, in C., Tarantino, a cura di, Il soggiorno obbligato, Bologna, Il Mulino, pp. 305-320.
  11. Spicuglia, M., (2021), Noi due siamo uno. Storia di Andrea Soldi, morto per un TSO, Torino, ADD Editore.
  12. Wasserman, D., Apter, G., Baeken, C., Bailey, S., Balazs, J., et al., (2020), Compulsory admissions of patients with mental disorders: State of the art on ethical and legislative aspects in 40 European countries, European Psychiatry, 63, 1, p. 82.
  13. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, (2012), Involuntary placement and involuntary treatment of persons with mental health problems. [Online] Consultabile all’indirizzo: https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2012/involuntary-placement-and-involuntary-treatment-persons-mental-health-problems (Data di accesso: 20 aprile 2025).