Stitched Identities: Frankenstein between Cultural Theory and Teaching Practice

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54103/2035-7680/30978

Keywords:

body; Cultural Studies; Literature teaching; upper secondary school education; Frankenstein; discourse and power

Abstract

The article proposes a Cultural Studies approach to the analysis of narrative literary texts, taking the body as a keyword and critical device. Drawing on Cultural Studies perspectives, it shows how the body constitutes a privileged site in which ideological and political dynamics, as well as cultural conflicts, become visible—dynamics that have historically contributed to defining, delimiting, or excluding what is recognised as ‘human,’ ‘normal,’ and ‘legitimate’ and that shape processes of subjectivation and identification.

The first part outlines a theoretical framework that conceives of the body as a historically situated construction and as a surface of cultural inscription, bringing into dialogue Michel Foucault, feminist and queer theory (with particular reference to Judith Butler and Elizabeth Grosz), and key trajectories within Cultural Studies. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein (1818; 1831) is taken as an exemplary case study, as it enables an effective examination of the relationship between body and identity (both individual and social), the logics of inclusion and exclusion, and the processes of normalisation and monstrification of the ‘othered’ body.

The second part presents a teaching module for a fourth-year upper secondary school class, which translates these categories into a Cultural Studies reading of the novel centred on the Creature’s body as a culturally legible text and as a critical device through which identity is constructed—or denied. The proposed activity shows how a canonical text can be reread in light of issues that shape the contemporary socio-cultural present, thereby reinforcing the critical and formative function of literary education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Anna Pasolini, San Raffaele University of Rome

Anna Pasolini è Professoressa Associata di Lingua, Linguistica e Traduzione Inglese presso l’Università Telematica San Raffaele (Roma). La sua attività di ricerca si concentra sulle letterature e culture inglesi e anglofone contemporanee, con particolare attenzione alla rappresentazione delle identità di genere e intersezionali nelle narrazioni popolari tra fiaba, poliziesco, noir e speculative fiction. Ha pubblicato saggi su Angela Carter, Derek Raymond, Jeanette Winterson e Bernardine Evaristo ed è autrice della monografia Bodies That Bleed. Metamorphosis in Angela Carter’s Fairy Tales (2016). Insieme a Nicoletta Vallorani, è co-autrice di Corpi magici. Scritture incarnate dal fantastico alla fantascienza (Mimesis, 2021). È membro fondatore del gruppo di ricerca C.H.A.I.N. e co-caporedattrice della rivista Altre Modernità.

References

Amigot, Patricia, e Margot Pujal. “On Power, Freedom, and Gender: A Fruitful Tension between Foucault and Feminism.” Theory & Psychology, vol. 19, no. 5, 2009, pp. 646–669.

Barker, Chris. Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice. Sage Publications, 2000.

Barker, Chris, e Emma Jane. Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice. 5^ ed., Sage Publications, 2016.

Bordo, Susan. “Feminism, Foucault and the Politics of the Body.” Feminist Theory and the Body: A Reader, a cura di Janet Price e Margrit Shildrick, Edinburgh University Press, 1999, pp. 179-202.

Butler, Judith. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex”. Routledge, 1993.

---. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge, 1990.

de Beauvoir, Simone. Il secondo sesso. Trad. it. Bruno Fonzi, Il Saggiatore, 1961.

Foucault, Michel. La volontà di sapere. Trad. it. Pasquale Pasquino e Giovanna Procacci, Universale economica Feltrinelli, 1988.

---. Sorvegliare e Punire. Nascita della prigione. Trad. it. Alcesti Tarchetti, Giulio Einaudi, 1993.

Giuliani, Gaia. Monsters, Catastrophes and the Anthropocene: A Postcolonial Critique. Routledge, 2021.

Grosz, Elizabeth. Space, Time and Perversion: Essays on the Politics of Bodies. Routledge, 1995.

Hall, Stuart. “The Question of Cultural Identity.” Modernity and Its Futures, a cura di Stuart Hall, et al., Polity Press in association with the Open University, 1992, pp. 273–326.

Hekman, Susan J., a cura di. Feminist Interpretations of Michel Foucault. Penn State UP, 1996.

Kristeva, Julia. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. Columbia University Press, 1982.

Longhurst, Brian, et al. Introducing Cultural Studies. 3^ ed., Routledge, 2016.

McLaren, Margaret A. Feminism, Foucault, and Embodied Subjectivity. State University of New York Press, 2002.

McNay, Lois. Foucault and Feminism: Power, Gender and the Self. Polity Press, 1992.

McNeil, Maureen. “Body.” New Keywords: A Revised Vocabulary of Culture and Society, a cura di Tony Bennett et al., Blackwell Publishing, 2005, pp. 15-17.

Nuzzo, Luciano. “Foucault and the enigma of the monster.” International Journal of Semiotic Law, vol. 26, no. 1, 2013, pp. 55-72.

Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Epistemology of the Closet. University of California Press, 1990.

Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus. A cura di, e con Introduzione e note al testo di Siv Jansson, Wordsworth Classics, 1999.

Williams, Raymond. “Culture is ordinary.” Resources of Hope: Culture, Democracy, Socialism, a cura di Robin Gable, Verso, 1989, pp. 3-18.

---. Keywords. A Vocabulary of Culture and Society, 2^ ed. Oxford University Press, [1983] 2015.

Published

2026-02-28

How to Cite

Pasolini, Anna. 2026. “Stitched Identities: Frankenstein Between Cultural Theory and Teaching Practice”. Altre Modernità, February, 261-85. https://doi.org/10.54103/2035-7680/30978.

Issue

Section

Saggi Ensayos Essais Essays