Dale Maharidge and Michael Williamson’s ‘Homeland’: de-constructing the rhetoric of consensus in the aftermath of September 11th attacks
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.13130/2035-7680/1311Mots-clés :
9/11, Homeland, Dale Maharidge, Michael WilliamsonRésumé
Focusing on Dale Maharidge and Michael Williamson’s reportage Homeland (2004), this essay explores the de-construction of the discursive and cultural strategies of the “state of exception” used to depict 9/11 events and the dialectics between domestic and international politics and economies. The analysis focuses in particular on four elements: the concept of “Ground Zero” and “Homeland” and their use as lexical and symbolic catalysts of nationalism; the forms and the erasure of dissent; the commodification of 9/11 and the Iraqi war; and the relation between the national rhetoric and the transnational economy in the last two decades.Statistiques
Chargement des statistiques…
Téléchargements
Publié-e
2011-09-10
Comment citer
Schiavini, Cinzia. 2011. « Dale Maharidge and Michael Williamson’s ‘Homeland’: De-Constructing the Rhetoric of Consensus in the Aftermath of September 11th Attacks ». Altre Modernità, septembre, 310-24. https://doi.org/10.13130/2035-7680/1311.
Numéro
Rubrique
Saggi Ensayos Essais Essays