Notes on the “Stele of the Punishments” from Epidaurus

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54103/1128-8221/30028

Keywords:

Epidaurus, house-searches in Greek Law, legal procedure (Greece), oaths in litigation, theft, rule of law as source of legitimacy

Abstract

This essay examines several legal aspects in the recently published “Stele of the Punishments” from

Epidaurus. The essay shows that the search of the house of Pasiteles in Hermione for stolen goods

by officials from Epidaurus was in no way illegal. In the account of the search the text mentions the

role of a slave to establish the liability of Lykiskos. Pasiteles was summoned before the Three

Hundred at Epidaurus, questioned about his actions, and asked to name sureties, to swear an oath of

denial, and to pay court fees. After he did not show up at his trial, the Three Hundred found him

guilty of theft, condemned him to a fine of double the amount stolen, and voted to confiscate his

property. Some time later, Lykiskos was condemned to pay a fine either for his role in this theft or

for another offense. The legal procedure followed in the cases reveals similarities and differences

from legal procedure at Athens. Finally, the stele aimed to warn those working in the sanctuary

against embezzling valuable items and also demonstrated to Greek visitors to the shrine of

Asclepius that the people of Epidaurus upheld the basic tenets of the rule of law.

Questo saggio esamina diversi aspetti giuridici della recentemente pubblicata “Stele delle

punizioni” di Epidauro. Il saggio dimostra che la perquisizione della casa di Pasiteles a Ermione,

alla ricerca di beni rubati, da parte dei funzionari di Epidauro non era affatto illegale. Nel resoconto

della perquisizione, il testo menziona il ruolo di uno schiavo nel determinare la responsabilit. di

Lykiskos. Pasiteles fu convocato davanti ai Trecento a Epidauro, interrogato sulle sue azioni e

invitato a nominare dei garanti, a prestare giuramento di negazione e a pagare le spese processuali.

Dopo che non si present. al processo, i Trecento lo dichiararono colpevole di furto, lo

condannarono a una multa pari al doppio dell'importo rubato e votarono di confiscare i suoi beni.

Qualche tempo dopo, Lykiskos fu condannato a pagare una multa per il suo ruolo in questo furto o

per un altro reato. La procedura legale seguita nei casi in questione rivela somiglianze e differenze

rispetto alla procedura legale in uso ad Atene. Infine, la stele aveva lo scopo di mettere in guardia

coloro che lavoravano nel santuario dal sottrarre oggetti di valore e dimostrava anche ai visitatori

greci del santuario di Asclepio che il popolo di Epidauro sosteneva i principi fondamentali dello

Stato di diritto.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bauschatz, J. 2013. Law and Enforcement in Ptolemaic Egypt. Cambridge.

Boffo, L. and Faraguna, M. 2021. Le poleis e i loro archivi. Studi su pratiche documentarie, istituzioni e società nell’antichità greca. (Graeca Tergestina. Storia e Civiltà 6). Trieste.

Canevaro, M. 2013. The Documents in the Attic Orators: Laws and Decrees in the Public Speeches of the Demosthenic Corpus. Oxford.

Canevaro, M. 2017. “The Rule of Law as the Measure of Political Legitimacy in the Greek City States,” Hague Journal of the Rule of Law 9: 211-236.

Carey, C. 2004. “Offense and Procedure in Athenian Law”, in E. M. Harris and L. Rubinstein, eds., The Law and Courts in Ancient Greece. London: 111-136.

Carusi, C. 2021. “The Recruitment and Remuneration of Construction Workers in Classical Athens”, in K. Harter-Uibopuu and W. Riess, eds., Symposion 2019, Vienna, 2021: 131-151.

Cohen, D. 1983. Theft in Athenian Law. Munich.

Cohen, D. 1984. “The Athenian Law of Adultery,” RIDA 31: 147-165.

Edelstein, E. J. and Edelstein, L. 1998. Asclepius: Collection and Interpretation of the Testimonies. Baltimore.

Ellis-Evans, A. and Kagan, J. 2022. “Bimetallism, Coinage and Empire in Persian Anatolia,” Phoenix 76: 178-227.

Feyel, C. 2006. Les artisans dans les sanctuaries grecs à travers la documentation financière en Grèce. Athens.

Fisher, N. R. E. 2001. Aeschines: Against Timarchus. Oxford.

Gagarin, M. 2006. “Introduction”, in M. Gagarin and D. Cohen, eds., The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek Law. Cambridge.

Gagarin, M. 2010. “Serfs and slaves at Gortyn,” Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, Romanistische Abteilung 127: 14-31.

Hansen, M. H. 1976. Apagoge, Endeixis, and Ephegesis against Kakourgoi, Atimoi and Pheugontes. Odense.

Harris, E. M. 1990. “The Constitution of the Five Thousand,” HSCP 93: 243-280.

Harris, E. M. 2013a. The Rule of Law in Action in Democratic Athens. Oxford.

Harris, E. M. 2013b. “The Plaint in Athenian Law and Legal Procedure”, in M. Faraguna, ed., Archives and Archival Documents in Ancient Societies, Trieste: 143-162.

Harris, E. M. 2018. “Trials, Private Arbitration, and Public Arbitration in Classical Athens or the Background to [Arist.] Ath. Pol. 53, 1-7”, in C. Bearzot, M. Canevaro, T. Gargiulo and E. Poddighe, eds., Athenaion Politeiai tra storia, politica e sociologia: Aristotele e Pseudo-Senofonte (= Quaderni di Erga/Logoi), Milan: 213-230.

Harris, E. M. 2019. “Aeschylus’ Eumenides, The Role of the Areopagus and Political Discourse in Attic Tragedy” in A. Markantonatos and E. Volonaki, eds., Poet and Orator: A Symbiotic Relationship in Democratic Athens, Berlin and Boston: 389-419.

Harris, E. M. 2020. “The Rule of Law and Economic Growth in Ancient Greece”, in E. M. Harris and M. Canevaro, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Greek Law. Oxford. Online publication 2 September 2020.

Harris, E. M. 2024. “Unity and Diversity in Ancient Greek Law,” Classica et Medievalia Suppl. Vol. 1: 129-157.

Harris, E. M. and Esu, A. 2021. “Policing Major Crimes in Classical Athens: Eisangelia and Other Public Procedures,” RDE 11: 39-119.

Harris, E. M. and Esu, A., eds. 2025. Keeping to the Point: Law, Character and Rhetoric in Athenian Forensic Oratory. Edinburgh.

Harrison, A. R. W. 1968. The Law of Athens: Family and Property. Oxford.

Harrison, A. R. W. 1971. The Law of Athens: Procedure. Oxford.

Haussoullier, B. 1917. Traité entre Delphes et Pellana: Étude de Droit Grec. Paris.

Hennig, D. 1994. “Immoblienerwerb durch Nichtbürger in der klassischen und hellenistischen Polis.” Chiron 24: 305-344.

Kapparis, K. 1996. “Humiliating the Adulterer: The Law and the Practice in Classical Athens,” RIDA3 43: 63-77.

Keaney, J. 1974. “Theophrastus on Greek Legal Procedure,” TAPA 104: 179-194.

Kelly, T. 1966. “The Calaurian Amphictyony,” AJA 70.2: 113-121.

Kritzas, Ch. and Mavromatidis, G. 1987. Ἡ Στοὰ τοῦ Ἀβάτου στὸ Ἀσκληπιεῖο τῆς Ἐπιδαύρου. Athens.

Kritzas, C. and Prignitz, S. 2020. “The ‘Stele of the Punishments’: A New Inscription from Epidauros,” ArchEph 159: 1-61.

Lewis, D. M. 2013. “Slave Marriages in the laws of Gortyn: A Matter of Rights?” Historia 62.4: 390-416.

Lewis, D. M. 2018. Greek Slave Systems in their Eastern Mediterranean Context, c. 800-146 B.C., Oxford.

Lewis, D. M. 2023. “Did Serfdom Exist in Classical and Hellenistic Crete?” in P. Scheibelreiter, ed., Symposion 2022: Vorträge zur griechischen und hellenistischen Rechtsgeschichte, Vienna: 225-252.

Lipsius, J. H. 1905-1915. Das attische Recht und Rechtsverfahren, I-III. Leipzig.

MacDowell, D. M. 1963. Athenian Homicide Law in the Age of the Orators. Manchester.

MacDowell, D. M. 2000. Demosthenes: On the False Embassy (Oration 19). Oxford.

Mackil, E. 2013. Creating a Common Polity. Religion, Economy, and Politics in Making a Greek Koinon. Berkeley and Los Angeles.

Maffi, A. 2018. “La struttura giuridica del contratto in Grecia (60 anni dopo)”, in W. Riess, ed., Colloquia Attica. Band I. Neuere Forschungen zur Archaik, zum athenische Recht und zur Magie, Stuttgart: 145-176.

Mørkholm, O. 1991. Early Hellenistic Coinage: From the Accession of Alexander to the Peace of Apameia (336–186). Cambridge.

Pelloso, C. 2008. Studi sul furto nell’antichità mediterranea. Padua.

Prignitz, S. and Thür, G. 2025. “Problems with the Buildings in the Sanctuary of Epidaurus: The ‘Stele of the Punishments’,” Hesperia 94: 185-223.

Rubinstein, L. 2023. “Friendship Betrayed: Isocrates 16 and the Athenian Reconciliation of 403/402 BCE”, in E. Volonaki, A. Efstathiou, J. Filonik and C. Kremmydas, eds., Friendship in Ancient Greek Thought and Literature: Essays in Honour of Chris Carey and Michael J. Edwards. Leiden: 282-305.

Schwyzer, E. 1939-1971. Griechische Grammatik auf der Grundlage von Karl Brugmanns Griechischer Grammatik. Munich.

Sisov, S. K. 2021a. “Federal Citizenship and the Right of ΕΓΚΤΗΣΙΣ in the Achaian Koinon,” ZPE 217: 105-118.

Sisov, S. K. 2021b. “Federal Citizenship and the Right of ΕΓΚΤΗΣΙΣ in the Aitolian Koinon,” ZPE 217: 119-127.

Thür, G. 2008. “The Principle of Fairness in Athenian Legal Procedure: Thoughts on the Echinos and Enklema,” Dike 11: 51–73.

Thür, G. 2021. “Prozessrechtlicher Kommentar zur ‘Strafstele’ aus Epidauros, ca. 360, ca. 355 und nach 338 v. Chr.,” Geistes-, Sozial- und Kulturwissenschaftlicher Anzeiger 155: 29-62.

Thür, G. and Taüber, H. 1994. Prozessrechtliche Inschriften der griechischen Poleis: Arkadien (IPArk). Vienna.

Smyth, H. W. 1890. Syntax of the Moods and Tenses of the Greek Verb. Boston.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-24

How to Cite

Harris, E. M. (2025). Notes on the “Stele of the Punishments” from Epidaurus. Dike - Rivista Di Storia Del Diritto Greco Ed Ellenistico, 28. https://doi.org/10.54103/1128-8221/30028

Issue

Section

Articoli