Due osservazioni sulla metafisica della prescienza
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13130/2240-9599/3475Abstract
The paper discusses two problems concerning the metaphysics of foreknowledge. In the first section I focus on an argument that purports to show that there is no such a thing. In the second one I discuss the relation between the foreknowledge of our own behaviour, or ‘autoforeknowledge’, and what we may call ‘the phenomenology of freedom’. As for the first issue, I employ David Lewis’ discussion of the Grandfather Paradox to argue that the argument in question overlooks a key feature of the semantics of ‘can’. As for the second issue, I develop some remarks by Paul Horwich to show that, contrary appearances notwithstanding, autoforeknowledge is not necessarily incompatible with the phenomenology of freedom.
Downloads
References
ARISTOTELE, Dell’anima, in Id., Opere, Roma - Bari, Laterza, 1983.
BAIA, Alex, Presentism and the grounding of truth, «Philosophical studies» 159 (2012), pp. 341-356.
DICK, Philip K., E Jones creò il mondo, Roma, Fanucci, 2001.
EARMAN, John, Implications of causal propagation outside the null cone, «Australasian Journal of Philosophy» 50 (1972), pp. 222-237.
GÖDEL, Kurt, A remark about the relationship between relativity theory and idealistic philosophy, in SCHILPP, Paul Arthur (ed.), Albert Einstein. Philosopher-scientist, La Salle, Open Court, 1949.
GODDU, Geoffrey Currier, Time travel and changing the past (or how to kill yourself and live to tell the tale), «Ratio» 16 (2003), pp. 16-32.
HORWICH, Paul, Asymmetries in time. Problems in the philosophy of science, Cambridge-London, MIT Press, 1992.
HORWICH, Paul, On some alleged paradoxes of time travel, «The Journal of Philosophy» 72 (1975), pp. 432-444.
KANE, Robert, A contemporary introduction to free will, New York - Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005.
KELLER, Simon, Presentism and truthmaking, «Oxford Studies in Metaphysics» 1 (2004), pp. 83-104.
KELLER, Simon - NELSON, Michael (eds.), Presentists should believe in time travel, «Australasian Journal of Philosophy» 79 (2001), pp. 333-345.
KIOURTI, Ira, Killing baby Suzy, «Philosophical studies» 139 (2008), pp. 343-352.
KRATZER, Angelika, What ‘must’ and ‘can’ must and can mean, «Linguistics and Philosophy» 1 (1977), pp. 337-355.
LEWIS, David, The paradoxes of time travel, «American Philosophical Quarterly» 13 (1976), pp. 145-152.
MACFARLANE, John, Epistemic modals are assessment-sensitive, in EGAN, Andy - WEATHERSON, Brian (eds.), Epistemic modality, New York - Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011.
WEATHERSON, Brian, Nonindexicalcontextualism, «Synthese» 166 (2009), pp. 231-250.
MARKOSIAN, Ned, A defense of presentism, «Oxford Studies in Metaphysics» 1 (2004), pp. 47-82.
RADFORD, Colin, Knowledge. By examples, «Analysis» 27 (1966), pp. 1-11.
SIDER, Theodore, Time travel, coincidences and counterfactuals, «Philosophical Studies» 110 (2002), pp. 115-138.
SIDER, Theodore, Traveling in A- and B-time, «The Monist» 88 (2005), pp. 329-335.
SMITH, Nicholas J.J., Bananas enough for time travel?, «The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science» 48 (1997), pp. 363-389.
VAN INWAGEN, Peter, Changing the past, «Oxford Studies in Metaphysics» 5 (2010), pp. 3-28.
VIHVELIN, Kadri, Foreknowledge, Frankfurt, and ability to do otherwise: a reply to Fischer, «Canadian Journal of Philosophy» 38 (2008), pp. 343-371.
VIHVELIN, Kadri, What time travelers cannot do, «Philosophical Studies» 81 (1996), pp. 315-330.
VRANAS, Peter B.M., Can I kill my younger self? Time travel and the retrosuicide paradox, «Pacific Philosophical Quarterly» 90 (2009), pp. 520-534.
VRANAS, Peter B.M., What time travelers may be able to do, «Philosophical Studies» 150 (2010), pp. 115-121.
