Measuring bird abundance - A comparison of methodologies between capture/recapture and audio-visual surveys

Autori/Autrici

  • Marco Basile Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto di Biologia Agroambientale e Forestale, Roma Italy - Chair of Wildlife Ecology and Management, University of Freiburg, Germany
  • Rosario Balestrieri Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto di Biologia Agroambientale e Forestale, Roma Italy
  • Mario Posillico Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto di Biologia Agroambientale e Forestale, Roma Italy - Corpo Forestale dello Stato, Ufficio Territoriale Biodiversità di Castel di Sangro-Centro Ricerche Ambienti Montani, Castel di Sangro (AQ) Italy
  • Andrea Mancinelli Corpo Forestale dello Stato, Ufficio Territoriale Biodiversità di Castel di Sangro-Centro Ricerche Ambienti Montani, Castel di Sangro (AQ) Italy
  • Tiziana Altea Corpo Forestale dello Stato, Ufficio Territoriale Biodiversità di Castel di Sangro-Centro Ricerche Ambienti Montani, Castel di Sangro (AQ) Italy
  • Giorgio Matteucci Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto per i Sistemi Agricoli e Forestali del Mediterraneo, Portici (NA) Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30456/avo.2016201

Parole chiave:

ringing, treecreeper, point counts, deciduous woodland, forest-dwelling passerine

Abstract

Research on species-habitat relationship implies that a specific parameter related to the species, such as abundance, has to be measured and compared to environmental features. Different methods have been implemented in the collection of abundance data on birds and different statistical techniques have been developed to deal with the great diversity of data collection. The aim of this study is to compare different sampling methods and statistical techniques currently used to estimate abundance, employing them in a dense forest environment: capture-mark-recapture vs. point counts. Short-toed treecreepers Certhia brachydactyla were captured through mist-netting and surveyed through song count. Capture data were analysed using a classical approach and a spatially-explicit approach (SECR), while count data were analysed with N-mixture models. Results show that classical capture analyses yield a lower abundance, while SECR and N-mixture models give similar and higher estimates. An optimization of the sampling design for studies regarding birds` abundance and species-habitat relationship should consider the use of point counts for song/visual detection of individual birds while fitting N-mixture models for abundance estimation.

Downloads

I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.

Pubblicato

2016-12-30

Come citare

Basile, M., Balestrieri, R., Posillico, M., Mancinelli, A., Altea, T., & Matteucci, G. (2016). Measuring bird abundance - A comparison of methodologies between capture/recapture and audio-visual surveys. Avocetta, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.30456/avo.2016201

Fascicolo

Sezione

Research Articles