The Neural Secrets of Narration

Authors

  • Stefano Calabrese Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia

Keywords:

Default Mode Network; Endocrinology; Emplotment; Mind reading; Social brain; Salience.

Abstract

The Default Mode Network (DMN) is a network of brain regions responsible for active or passive narration and the sharing of experiences. The ability to simulate experiences and use memories to construct hypothetical tales about how people might behave is a fundamental skill in building a social aggregate as it allows us to foreshadow the consequences of our actions and reflect on the intentions of others, simulating their experiences to anticipate their behavior. We can process imaginary situations whose accuracy is a measure of our social skills since the closer the imagination approaches social reality, the better we negotiate our social worlds. The DMN is responsible for these activities that encompass the frontal and parietal structures of the brain along the midline, the lateral and medial temporal lobes, and the lateral parietal cortex. This work reviews the DMN in all its aspects, both in the construction of narrative plots and in the preparation of believable and immersive emotional scenarios, including endocrine outcomes (oxytocin and cortisol).

References

Baron-Cohen, Simon. La scienza del male. L’empatia e le origini della crudeltà. Trad. it., Raffael-lo Cortina, 2012.

Baumgartner, Thomas, et al. “Oxytocin shapes the neural circuitry of trust and trust ad-aptation in humans.” Neuron, vol. 58, 2008, pp. 639-50.

Bouizegarene, Nabil, et al. “Narrative as active inference: An integrative account of the functions of narratives.” Psyarxiv Preprint, 2020, pp. 1-55.

Brockington, Guilherme, et al. “Storytelling increases oxytocin and positive emotions and decreases cortisol and pain in hospitalized children”, PNAS, vol. 118, n. 22, 2021, pp. 1-7.

Djikic, Maja, Oatley, Keit, and Moldoveanu, Mihnea C. “Reading other minds: Effects of literature on empathy”. Scientific Study of Literature, vol. 3, n. 1, 2013, pp. 28-47.

Fauconnier, Gilles, and Turner, Mark. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. Basic Books, 2002.

Figueiredo, Tiago, and Mattos, Paulo. “Disentangling the phenomenology of mind-wandering.” Journal of Attention Disorder, vol. 26, n. 4, 2021, pp. 502-07.

Fingelkurts, Andrew A., Fingelkurts, Alexander A., and Kallio-Tamminen, Tarja. “Trait lasting alteration of the brain default mode network in experienced meditators and the experiential selfhood.” Self and Identity, vol. 15, n. 4, 2016, pp.1-13.

Green, Melanie C., and Brock, Timothy C. “The role of transportation in the persua-siveness of public narratives.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 79, n. 5, 2000, pp. 701-21.

Grodal, Torben. Immagini-corpo. Cinema, natura, emozioni. Trad. it., Diabasis, 2014.

Hsu, Chun-Ting, et al. “The magical activation of left amygdala when reading Harry Potter: an fMRI study on how descriptions of supra-natural events entertain and en-chant.” PloS one, vol. 10, n. 2, 2015, pp. 1-15.

Kidd, David Comer, and Castano, Emanuele. “Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind.” Science, vol. 342, n. 6156, 2013, pp. 377-80.

Kurby, Christopher A., and. Zacks, Jeffrey M. “The activation of modality-specific rep-resentations during discourse processing.” Brain and Language, vol. 126, n. 3, 2013, pp. 338-49.

Jacobs, Arthur M., and Willems, Roel M. “The fictive brain: neurocognitive correlates of engagement in literature.” Review of General Psychology, vol. 22, n. 2, 2018, pp. 147-60.

Mar, Raymond A., and Oatley, Keith. “The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience.” Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 3, n. 3, 2008, pp. 173-92.

Mehl‐Madrona, Lewis, and Mainguy, Barbara. “Neuroscience and narra-tive.” Anthropology of Consciousness, vol. 33, n. 1, 2021, pp. 1-17.

Meyer-Lindenberg, Andreas, et al. “Oxytocin and vasopressin in the human brain: social neuropeptides for translational medicine.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 12, n. 9, 2011, pp. 524-38.

Nijhof, Annabel D., and Willems, Roel M. “Simulating fiction: individual differences in literature comprehension revealed with fMRI.” PLoS One, vol. 10, n. 2015, e0116492.

Rafetseder, Eva, Cristi‐Vargas, Renate and Perner, Josef. “Counterfactual reasoning: De-veloping a sense of ‘nearest possible world’.” Child Development, vol. 81, n. 1, 2010, pp. 376-89.

Ramstead, Maxwell J.D., Veissière, Samuel P.L. and Kirmayer, Laurence J. “Cultural af-fordances: Scaffolding local worlds through shared intentionality and regimes of at-tention.” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 7, n. 1090, 2016, pp. 1-21.

Raymond, Catherine, et al. “Salivary cortisol levels and depressive symptomatology in consumers and nonconsumers of self-help books: a pilot study.” Neural Plasticity, Ar-ticle ID 3136743, 2016.

Russell, Georgina, and Lightman, Stafford. “The human stress response.” Nature Reviews Endocrinology, vol. 15, n. 9, 2019, pp. 525-34.

Schacter, Daniel L., and Addis, Donna R. “The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: remembering the past and imagining the future.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 362, n. 1481, 2007, pp. 773-86.

Seth, Anil K., Keisuke Suzuki, and Critchley, Hugo D. “An interoceptive predictive cod-ing model of conscious presence.” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 2, n. 395, 2012, pp.1-16.

Sharon, Tanya, and. Woolley, Jacqueline D. “Do monsters dream? Young children’s un-derstanding of the fantasy/reality distinction.” British Journal of Developmental Psychology, vol. 22, n. 2, 2004, pp. 293-310.

Smallwood, Jonathan. “Distinguishing how from why the mind wanders: a process–occurrence framework for self-generated mental activity.” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 139, n. 3, 2013, pp. 519-35.

Spreng, R. Nathan, and Grady, Cheryl L. “Patterns of brain activity supporting autobio-graphical memory, prospection, and theory of mind, and their relationship to the default mode network.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 22, n. 6, 2010, pp. 1112-23.

Strawson, Galen. “Against narrativity.” Ratio, vol. 17, n. 4, 2004, 428-52.

Subbotsky, Eugene, and Slater, Elizabeth. “Children’s discrimination of fantastic vs real-istic visual displays after watching a film with magical content.” Psychological Reports, vol. 112, n. 2, 2011, pp. 603-9.

Tamir, Diana I., et al. “Reading fiction and reading minds: The role of simulation in the default network.” Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, vol. 11, n. 2, 2016, pp. 215-24.

Tylén, Kristian, et al. “Brains striving for coherence: Long-term cumulative plot for-mation in the default mode network.” Neuroimage, vol. 121, 2015, pp. 106-14.

Weed, Ethan, et al. “Theory of Mind in adults with right hemisphere damage: What’s the story?. Brain Lang, vol. 113, n. 2, 2010, pp. 65-72.

Xu, Jiang, et al. “Language in context: emergent features of word, sentence, and narra-tive comprehension.” Neuroimage, vol. 25, n. 3, 2005, pp. 1002-15.

Published

2023-02-01

How to Cite

Calabrese, S. (2023). The Neural Secrets of Narration. ENTHYMEMA, (31), 319–337. Retrieved from https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/enthymema/article/view/18654

Issue

Section

Essays
Received 2022-09-09
Accepted 2022-12-29
Published 2023-02-01