Measuring Experiences of Art in the Museum: Exploring Methodology for Getting It Right

Autori

  • Gemma Schino University of Groningen
  • Barend van Heusden University of Groningen
  • Franziska Nori Frankfurter Kunstverein
  • Ralf F. A. Cox University of Groningen
  • Héctor G. Gallegos González University of Groningen
  • Lisa-Maria van Klaveren UMCAmsterdam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54103/2039-9251/18562

Abstract

Can we measure the experiences of physical and VR art installations? How could that be done? The present research attempts to answer these questions through the use of a multimethod approach to assess every dimension of the experience of art. Wristband and questionnaires have been used as research tools to understand how the experience of art installations in the museum takes place and to study it, through and across two different installations. To examine art experiences in an ecologically valid setting, a pop-up lab was used at the Frankfurter Kunstverein, creating an opportunity to reach the «golden path» for empirical investigation of art experiences and, in the present instance, specific experience of art installations. Two installations have been selected from the exhibition «The Intelligence of Plants» (16.10.2021 – 20.02.2022) as single-cases to explore a suitable methodology for the experience of art installations. Both installations were chosen by the

curator Franziska Nori for their shared goal of connecting the observers’ bodies with the ones of the giant trees featured in both installations, in order to look for commonalities with other non-human fellow beings. Additionally, both these installations aim at evoking experiences of the sublime in the audience. Sensations, emotions, and thoughts, as well as physiological reactions and movements, partake in these experiences. Data collected with the presented methodology is potentially very rich thanks to the presence of original art installations (rather than their reproductions) over the space and time they are meant to be visited. Data from the questionnaires can be considered ecologically valid, as consisting of accurate subjective reportages of the visitors while actually experiencing the installations in situ. The proper measurement of physical and behavioral patterns is however harder to achieve as it relies on biometrics in a real-world setting. To overcome this issue and have more control over the multiple variables that can affect the measurements, a collaboration among disciplines and professionals from the art sector is at the heart of the matter.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Bai, Y., Maruskin, L. A., Chen, S., Gordon, A. M., Stellar, J. E., McNeil, G. D., Peng, K., & Keltner, D. Perceived Self-Size Scale in “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1037/t63774-000

Bethelmy, L. C., & Corraliza, J. A. (2019). Transcendence and sublime experience in nature: Awe and inspiring energy. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 509. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00509

Brady, E. The sublime in modern philosophy: Aesthetics, ethics, and nature. Cambridge University Press, 2013

Brown, E., & Cairns, P. (2004). A grounded investigation of game immersion in “CHI’04 Extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems”, 2004, pp. 1297-1300. https://doi.org/10.1145/985921.986048

Burnett M. & Gallagher S. 4E cognition and the spectrum of aesthetic experience in “JOLMA”, 2020

Carbon, C.C. Art perception in the museum: How we spend time and space in art exhibitions. In. “i-Perception”, 2017, Vol. 8, No. 1

Carbon, C.C., Empirical approaches to studying art experience, in “Journal of Perceptual Imaging” Vol. 2, No. 1, 2019, pp: 1-7.

Chandler, K. Dewey's phenomenology of knowledge. in “Philosophy Today”, 1977. Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 43-55.

Chirico, A., Clewis, R. R., Yaden, D. B., & Gaggioli, A. Nature versus art as elicitors of the sublime: A virtual reality study. in “PloS one”, Vol. 16, No. 3 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233628

Chirico, A., Yaden, D. B. Awe: A Self-Transcendent and Sometimes Transformative Emotion. in “The Function of Emotions”, 2018, Springer, pp. 221-233

Chirico, A., Yaden, D. B., Riva, G., & Gaggioli, A. The potential of virtual reality for the investigation of awe in “Frontiers in psychology”, 2016, Vol. 7

De Bruyckere, B. Embalmed Twins I and II [installation with sculptures made by wax, fabric, leather, rope, wood, iron, epoxy] in the exhibition “The Intelligence of Plants” at Frankfurter Kunstverein, Frankfurt, Germany. (n.d.), 2017, Retrieved from: https://www.fkv.de/en/berlinde-de-bruyckere/.

Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y.S., The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.), 2005, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Dzedzickis, A., Kaklauskas, A., & Bucinskas, V. Human emotion recognition: Review of sensors and methods in “Sensors”, Vol. 20, No. 3:592. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20030592

Ferreira, M. D. P. Embodied Emotions: Observations and Experiments in Architecture and Corporeality (2015) Publisher: Faculdade de Arquitectura da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, 2015, pp. 119-132

Gallagher S. (2012) What Is Phenomenology? In: Phenomenology. Palgrave Philosophy Today. Palgrave Macmillan, London. pp. 7-18 https://doi-org.proxy-ub.rug.nl/10.1057/9781137283801_2

Grau, O. Virtual Art: from illusion to immersion (2001) transl. by G. Custance, MIT press, Cambridge-London, 2003, pp. 2-13

Gulhan, D., Durant, S., & Zanker, J. M. Similarity of gaze patterns across physical and virtual versions of an installation artwork. In “Scientific reports”, 2021, Vol. 11, No.1, pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91904-x

James, W. L’expérience de l’activité, in Ed., Essais d’empirisme radical. Marseille, Agone (2005). Quoted by Richard Shusterman, Body and the Arts: The Need for Somaesthetics, Diogenes, 2011/1 (n° 233-234), p. 9-29.

Kant, I. (1790). Kritik der Urteilskraft, Lagarde & Friedrich.

Kapoula, Z., Adenis, M.-S., Lê, T.-T., Yang, Q., & Lipede, G. Pictorial depth increases body sway. in “Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts”, 2011, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 186–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022087

Kim, Y., Lee, H., Falling in Love with Virtual Reality Art: A New Perspective on 3D Immersive Virtual Reality for Future Sustaining Art Consumption, in “International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction”, Vol 38, No. 4, 2022, pp. 371-382. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1944534

Konečni, V.J. The aesthetic trinity: Awe, being moved, thrills. in “Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts”, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 27-44.

Kühnapfel, C., Fingerhut, J., Brinkmann, H., Ganster, V., Tanaka, T., Specker, E., … Pelowski, M. (2022, April 29). How do we move in front of art? How does this relate to art experience? Linking movement, eye tracking, emotion, and evaluations in an ecologically-valid gallery setting. Pre-print available online on PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/kx86d

Lanzoni S. Practicing psychology in the art gallery: Vernon Lee's aesthetics of empathy. In “Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences”, 2009, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 330-354. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.20395

Lee, V. Beauty and Ugliness and other studies in psychological aesthetics. (1912) in Lee and Anstruther-Thomson, p. iiv

Lee, V. Beauty and Ugliness and other studies in psychological aesthetics. (1912) in Lee and Anstruther-Thomson, p. 153-54.

M. Pelowski Tears and transformation: feeling like crying as an indicator of insightful or ‘aesthetic’ experience in empirical study of art. In “Frontiers in Psychology” Vol. 6 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01006

Marshmallow Laser Feast, Treehugger: Wawona [VR experience and installation] in the exhibition “The Intelligence of Plants” at Frankfurter Kunstverein, Frankfurt, Germany. (n.d.), 2017, Retrieved from: https://www.fkv.de/en/marshmallow-laser-feast/.

Mashek, D., Cannaday, L. W., & Tangney, J. P. Inclusion of community in self scale: A single‐item pictorial measure of community connectedness in “Journal of Community Psychology”, 2007, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 257-275.

Mazzocut-Mis, M., Visconti, A., Tahayori, H., & Ceria, M. Sublime Experience: New Strategies for Measuring the Aesthetic Impact of the Sublime. in “Imagine Math”, 2020, pp. 167-187 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42653-8_11

Merleau-Ponty, M., & Smyth, B. (2020). The Sensible World and the World of Expression: Course Notes from the Collège de France, 1953. Northwestern University Press.

Nummenmaa, L., Glerean, E., Hari, R., & Hietanen, J. K. (2014). Bodily maps of emotions in “Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences”, 2014, Vol. 111, No. 2, pp. 646-651.

Oravec, C. John Muir, Yosemite, and the sublime response: A study in the rhetoric of preservationism in “Quarterly Journal of Speech”, 1981, Vol. 67, No. 3 pp. 245-258.

Pelowski M., Leder H., Mitschke V., Specker E., Gerger G., Tinio P.P.L., Vaporova E., Bieg T. & Husslein-Arco A. Capturing Aesthetic Experiences With Installation Art: An Empirical Assessment of Emotion, Evaluations, and Mobile Eye Tracking in Olafur Eliasson’s “Baroque, Baroque!”. In “Frontiers in Psychology”, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01255

Pelowski, M., Forster, M., Tinio, P. P. L., Scholl, M., & Leder, H. Beyond the lab: an examination of key factors influencing interaction with ‘real’ and museum-based art. in “Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts”, 2017, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 245–264 https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000141

Porter, J. I. Is the Sublime an Aesthetic Value? in “Aesthetic Value in Classical Antiquity”, 2012 Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. Available From: Brill https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004232822_004

Ragot, M., Martin, N., Em, S., Pallamin, N., & Diverrez, J. M. Emotion recognition using physiological signals: laboratory vs. wearable sensors in “International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics”, 2017, pp. 15-22. https://doi-org.proxy-ub.rug.nl/10.1007/978-3-319-60639-2_2

Rozzoni, C. A Husserlian Approach to Aesthetic Experience: Existential Disinterest and Axiological Interest, 2019, in “PHAINOMENON”, 29 pp.121-127

Sadia, S. Empirical Methodologies and the Value of Subjectivity in the Analysis of the Experience of Contemporary Experiential Art. In “Art & Perception”, 2021, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 1-20, https://doi.org/10.1163/22134913-bja10009

Scherer, K. R., Shuman, V., Fontaine, J., & Soriano, C. The GRID meets the Wheel: Assessing emotional feeling via self-report in “Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook”, 2013. https://doi.org/0.1093/acprof:oso/9780199592746.003.0019

Schino, G., van Klaveren, L.-M., Gallegos González, H. G., & Cox, R. F. A. Applying bodily sensation maps to art-elicited emotions: An explorative study. In “Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts”, 2021 Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000444

Schneider, Kirk J. Awakening to awe: Personal stories of profound transformation. Rowman & Littlefield, 2009.

Schuurmans, A. A., de Looff, P., Nijhof, K. S., Rosada, C., Scholte, R. H., Popma, A., & Otten, R. Validity of the Empatica E4 wristband to measure heart rate variability (HRV) parameters: A comparison to electrocardiography (ECG) in “Journal of medical systems”, 2020, Vol. 44, No. 11, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-020-01648-w

Shiota, M. N., Keltner, D., & Mossman, A. The nature of awe: Elicitors, appraisals, and effects on self-concept in “Cognition and emotion”, 2007, Vol. 21 No. 5, pp. 944-963. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930600923668

Stamatopoulou, D., Lang, J., & Cupchik, G. C. Empathy, awe and the sublime: Where aesthetics and ethics meet in experience. in “Empathy: Past, present and future perspectives”, 2019, pp. 197-266.

Tinio, P. P., & Gartus, A. Characterizing the emotional response to art beyond pleasure: correspondence between the emotional characteristics of artworks and viewers’ emotional responses. In “Progress in brain research”, 2018, Vol. 237, pp. 319-342 https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.03.005

Tröndle, M., Greenwood, S., Kirchberg, V., & Tschacher, W. An integrative and comprehensive methodology for studying aesthetic experience in the field: Merging movement tracking, physiology, and psychological data. In “Environment and Behavior”, 2014, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 102-135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512453839

Tschacher, W., Greenwood, S., Kirchberg, V., Wintzerith, S., van den Berg, K., & Tröndle, M. Physiological correlates of aesthetic perception of artworks in a museum. in “Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts”, 2012, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 96-103 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023845

Van Heusden, B. V. Dealing with Difference: From cognition to semiotic cognition. In “Cognitive semiotics”, 2009, Vol. 4 (Supplement), 116-132.

Vischer R. (1873) Über das optische Formgefühl. Ein Beitrag zur Ästhetik. Leipzig: Herman Credner, English edition: On the optical sense of form: a contribution to aesthetics. In: Mallgrave, HF, Ikonomou E (eds) (1994). Empathy, form, and space: problems in german aesthetics, 1873–1893, p. 99.

Vischer R. (1873) Über das optische Formgefühl. Ein Beitrag zur Ästhetik. Leipzig: Herman Credner, English edition: On the optical sense of form: a contribution to aesthetics. In: Mallgrave, HF, Ikonomou E (eds) (1994). Empathy, form, and space: problems in german aesthetics, 1873–1893, p. 7

Wiseman, B., Carusi, A., Briggs, E., Poyntz, S., Pelowski, M., Alcock, L., & Mazzà, C. Embodied viewing and Degas’s Little Dancer Aged Fourteen: A multi-disciplinary experiment in eye-tracking and motion capture. in “The Senses and Society”, 2019, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 284-296.

##submission.downloads##

Pubblicato

2022-08-08 — Aggiornato il 2022-08-10

Versioni

Fascicolo

Sezione

Aesthetics, Technique and Emotion (ed. by A. Barale, C. Rozzoni)