To Shudder in the Sign of Mimesis Towards a Recovery of Unreduced Experience in Theodor W. Adorno

Elettra Villani

doi:10.54103/2039-9251/22237

Autori

Elettra Villani Università di Bologna

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54103/2039-9251/22237

Parole chiave:

Adorno, mimesis, experience, shudder

Abstract

In the last decades, an enthusiastic and undivided attention has been firmly dedicated to Adorno’s notion of mimesis. Highly enigmatic and resistant to an easy comprehension, this concept has often been regarded as a fundamental cornerstone of Adorno’s philosophy. In actual fact, the meanings and uses he has endowed the term with are so pervasive and diffuse that its imbrication in Adorno’s main philosophemes transcends the strict realm of art, showing a substantial entanglement between the aesthetic dimension and the epistemic, the anthropological and the social ones. More precisely, this paper aims to investigate his specific conception of mimesis as that faculty that could contribute to heal that historical process of experiential impoverishment that affects modern life. To the mimetic comportment Adorno associates a productive openness to the other that allows the subject to touch and to be touched by the object, without coercively subsuming it. Thereby, through a renewed interplay between mimesis and rationality, Adorno hopes to restore the possibility of a full and unreduced experience.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Adorno, T. W., Aesthetic Theory (1970), ed. and transl. by R. Hullot-Kentor, Continuum, London-New York 2002.

Adorno, T. W., Minima Moralia. Reflections on a Damaged Life, Verso, London-New York 2005.

Adorno, T. W., Negative Dialectics (1966), transl. by E. B. Ashton, Routledge, London-New York 2004.

Bronner, S. E., Of Critical Theory and its Theorists, Blackwell, Oxford 1994.

Crawford, R., Index of the Contemporary: Adorno, Art, Natural History, in “Evental Aesthetics”, VII/2, 2018, pp. 32-71.

Foster, R., Adorno. The Recovery of Experience, State University of New York Press, Albany 2007.

Gebauer, G., Wulf, C., Mimesis: The History of a Notion, 2013, available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3698687

Goehr, L., Dissonant Works and the Listening Public, in T. Huhn (ed. by), The Cambridge Companion to Adorno, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2004.

Habermas, J., The Theory of Communicative Action (1981), vol. 1 ((Reason and the Rationalization of Society), transl. by T. McCarthy, Beacon Press, Boston 1984.

Horkheimer, M., Adorno, T. W., Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments, Stanford University Press, Stanford 2002.

Hulatt, O., Reason, Mimesis, and Self-Preservation in Adorno, in “Journal of the History of Philosophy”, LIV/1, 2016, pp. 135-151.

Huyssen, A., Of Mice and Mimesis: Reading Spiegelman with Adorno, in “New German Critique”, LXXXI, 2000, pp. 65-82.

Jay, M., Mimesis and Mimetology: Adorno and Lacoue¬-Labarthe, in Huhn, T., Zuidervaart L. (ed. by), The Semblance of Subjectivity: Essays in Adorno’s Aesthetic Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge 1997.

Koch, G., Vöhler, M., Voss C., Zur Einführung: Die Mimesis und Ihre Künste, in id. (hrsg. v.), Die Mimesis und ihre Künste, Brill Fink, Paderborn 2010.

Matteucci, G., L’utopia dell’estetico in Adorno, in “Rivoluzioni Molecolari”, I, 2017.

Mussell, S., Mimesis Reconsidered: Adorno and Tarkovsky contra Habermas, in “Film-Philosophy”, XVII/1, 2013, pp. 212-233.

Paudyal, B. P., Mimesis in Adorno’s Aesthetic Theory, in “Journal of Philosophy”, IV/8, 2009, pp. 1-10.

Roberts, D., Art and Enlightenment: Aesthetic Theory after Adorno, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln 1991.

Singh, S., The Aesthetic Experience of Shudder Adorno and the Kantian Sublime, in N. Ross (ed. by), The Aesthetic Ground of Critical Theory: New Readings of Benjamin and Adorno, Rowman & Littlefield, London-New York 2015.

Thompson, M. J., Adorno’s Reception of Weber and Lukács, in P. E. Gordon, E. Hammer, M. Pensky (ed. by), A Companion to Adorno, Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken 2020.