Building Bridges: The Importance of Bringing Together the Empirical Sciences & the Humanities

Autori/Autrici

  • Rebekah M. Rodriguez-Boerwinkle Yale University
  • Eva Specker University of Wien

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54103/2039-9251/27833

Parole chiave:

digital aesthetics, art, psychology, philosophy

Abstract

In the 21st century, where digital advancements change how we perceive art and aesthetics, there is a need to examine how empirical sciences and the humanities can collaboratively explore these complexities. This paper highlights the reciprocal relationship between these fields, arguing that a fusion of empirical methods and philosophical inquiry can lead to a more comprehensive understanding of aesthetics in the digital age. Empirical sciences bring robust tools for quantifying human experiences, yet they often reduce complex phenomena to measurable parts, potentially missing nuances captured by the humanities. Conversely, the humanities provide deep conceptual insights, but these can benefit from empirical grounding to enhance their applicability and relevance. This interdisciplinary approach is illustrated through the study of digital aesthetics, particularly focusing on the challenges of understanding art and aesthetics across varied human perceptions. Additionally, this paper explores the evolving concept of authorship in the digital age, complicated by AI-generated art and digital mediums. By bridging the strengths of both disciplines, the authors advocate for a more nuanced and evidence-based understanding of these contemporary issues, emphasizing the importance of collaboration in navigating the digital landscape's complexities.

Downloads

I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Benjamin, W., The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction (1935/2008) (E. Jephcott & H. Zohn, transl. by), Harvard University Press.

Boddy, J., Brinkmann, H., Specker, E., Forster, M., Leder, H., & Rosenberg, R., The universality of aesthetic effects. An empirical and historical assessment of a dominant paradigm, in "Zeitschrift für Ästhetik und allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft", 68(2) (2023), pp. 147-171.

Bullot, N. J., & Reber, R., The artful mind meets art history: Toward a psycho-historical framework for the science of art appreciation, in "Behavioral and Brain Sciences", 36(2) (2013), pp. 123-137.

Chatterjee, A., Neuroaesthetics: A coming of age story, in "Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience", 23(1) (2011), pp. 53-62.

Chatterjee, A., Neuroaesthetics: Growing pains of a new discipline, in A. P. Shimamura & S. E. Palmer (Eds.), Aesthetic Science: Connecting Minds, Brains, and Experience (2012), Oxford University Press, pp. 299-317.

Descartes, R., Meditations on First Philosophy (1641/2024) (J. Cottingham, transl. by), Cambridge University Press.

Di Dio, C., Ardizzi, M., Schieppati, S. V., Massaro, D., Gilli, G., Gallese, V., & Marchetti, A., Art made by artificial intelligence: The effect of authorship on aesthetic judgments, in "Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts" (2023).

Dissanayake, E., The arts after Darwin: Does art have an origin and adaptive function, in "World Art Studies: Exploring Concepts and Approaches" (2008), pp. 241-263.

Duerksen, G. L., Some effects of expectation on evaluation of recorded musical performance, in "Journal of Research in Music Education", 20(2) (1972), pp. 268-272.

Ede, L., The Concept of Authorship: An Historical Perspective (1985).

Freedberg, D., & Gallese, V., Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience, in "Trends in Cognitive Sciences", 11(5) (2007), pp. 197-203.

Gunkel, D. J., Rethinking art and aesthetics in the age of creative machines: Editor’s introduction, in "Philosophy & Technology", 30 (2017), pp. 263-265.

Hampp, C., & Schwan, S., Perception and evaluation of authentic objects: Findings from a visitor study, in "Museum Management and Curatorship", 29(4) (2014), pp. 349-367.

Heidegger, M., Being and Time (1927/2010) (J. Stambaugh, transl. by), SUNY Press.

Hönekopp, J., Once more: Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness, in "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance", 32(2) (2006), pp. 199-209.

Husserl, E., & Moran, D., Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology (1913/2012) (W. R. Boyce Gibson, transl. by), Routledge.

Jiménez, Á. V., & Mesoudi, A., Prestige-biased social learning: Current evidence and outstanding questions, in "Palgrave Communications", 5(1) (2019).

Kant, I., Critique of Judgment (1790/2007) (J. C. Meredith, transl. by), Oxford University Press.

Kesner, L., Saving the humanities from evolutionary and neuroscientific imperialism, in "Journal of Art Historiography", (20) (2019), pp. 1-10.

Kirk, U., Skov, M., Hulme, O., Christensen, M. S., & Zeki, S., Modulation of aesthetic value by semantic context: An fMRI study, in "Neuroimage", 44(3) (2009), pp. 1125-1132.

Kranjec, A., Conceptual art made simple for neuroaesthetics, in "Frontiers in Human Neuroscience", 9 (2015), p. 267.

Kroger, C., & Margulis, E. H., “But they told me it was professional”: Extrinsic factors in the evaluation of musical performance, in "Psychology of Music", 45(1) (2017), pp. 49-64.

Kubovy, M., Neuroaesthetics: Maladies and remedies, in "Art & Perception", 8(1) (2020), pp. 1-26.

Latour, B., We Have Never Been Modern (2012), Harvard University Press.

Latour, B., Salk, J., & Woolgar, S., Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (2013).

Leder, H., Determinants of preference: When do we like what we know?, in "Empirical Studies of the Arts", 19(2) (2001), pp. 201-211.

Leder, H., Goller, J., Rigotti, T., & Forster, M., Private and shared taste in art and face appreciation, in "Frontiers in Human Neuroscience", 10 (2016), p. 155.

Locher, P., Krupinski, E., & Schaefer, A., Art and authenticity: Behavioral and eye-movement analyses, in "Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts", 9(4) (2015), pp. 356-367.

Locke, J., An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1847), Kay & Troutman.

Long, P. O., Invention, authorship, “intellectual property,” and the origin of patents: Notes toward a conceptual history, in "Technology and Culture", 32(4) (1991), pp. 846-884.

Makin, A. D., The gap between aesthetic science and aesthetic experience, in "Journal of Consciousness Studies", 24(1-2) (2017), pp. 184-213.

Martinez, J. E., Funk, F., & Todorov, A., Quantifying idiosyncratic and shared contributions to judgment, in "Behavior Research Methods", 52 (2020), pp. 1428-1444.

Mastandrea, S., & Crano, W. D., Peripheral factors affecting the evaluation of artworks, in "Empirical Studies of the Arts", 37(1) (2019), pp. 82-91.

Morin, E., Method: Towards a Study of Humankind (1977/1992) (R. Bélanger, transl. by), Peter Lang.

Newman, G. E., & Bloom, P., Art and authenticity: The importance of originals in judgments of value, in "Journal of Experimental Psychology: General", 141(3) (2012), pp. 558-569.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P., Recommendations for creating better concept definitions in the organizational, behavioral, and social sciences, in "Organizational Research Methods", 19(2) (2016), pp. 159-203.

Rampley, M., The Seductions of Darwin: Art, Evolution, Neuroscience (2017), Penn State Press.

Schwan, S., & Dutz, S., How do visitors perceive the role of authentic objects in museums?, in "Curator: The Museum Journal", 63(2) (2020), pp. 217-237.

Tallis, R., The limitations of a neurological approach to art, in "The Lancet", 372(9632) (2008), pp. 19-20.

Vessel, E. A., Ishizu, T., & Bignardi, G., Neural correlates of visual aesthetic appeal, in "The Routledge International Handbook of Neuroaesthetics" (2022), Routledge, pp. 103-133.

Vessel, E. A., Maurer, N., Denker, A. H., & Starr, G. G., Stronger shared taste for natural aesthetic domains than for artifacts of human culture, in "Cognition", 179 (2018), pp. 121-131.

Wolz, S. H., & Carbon, C. C., What’s wrong with an art fake? Cognitive and emotional variables influenced by authenticity status of artworks, in "Leonardo", 47(5) (2014), pp. 467-473.

Zeki, S., Art and the brain, in "Journal of Consciousness Studies", 6(6-7) (1999), pp. 76-96.

Pubblicato

2024-12-31

Come citare

Rodriguez-Boerwinkle, R. M., & Specker, E. (2024). Building Bridges: The Importance of Bringing Together the Empirical Sciences & the Humanities. Itinera, (28). https://doi.org/10.54103/2039-9251/27833