Where Monsters Graze or the Province Fantastic Practices of Dis-Institution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54103/2039-9251/27925Keywords:
Monstrous, Disgust, Design Culture, Spatial Application, WildnessAbstract
The contribution aims to explore the theme of disgust within the rejected substrate of the monstrous. While there is a fascination with what we perceive as deformed – be it body, matter, or space – this fascination often struggles to mature into an approach that em- braces the monstrous as a design strategy. This research seeks to frame the disruptive potentials of the monstrous as generative for the broader culture of design, reintroducing value to concepts and practices of dislocation. Starting from an interpretation of the pri- mary monstrous, the mother (Braidotti, 1994), the study intends to offer an overview that spans visual arts and performative theories, relating this density to its spatial application potentials. Through the relationship between perception and imagination, the paper pro- poses openings towards the wild (Metta, 2021), suggesting spatialized methodologies of the monstrous as privileged practices of action in marginal urban contexts, such as the province. By examining cases that address the legitimacy of bodies and their transition, and forms of investigation linking the liminality of territory with that of the individual (Miguel Vila, Fiordilatte, 2021, Padovaland, 2020, Comfrotless 2023; HPO, Provinciale, 2023; basso profilo, CAMPOTTO: accordi di comunità verso un nuovo piano di stazione, 2023 ), the paper investigates the oscillation between rejection and imagination, theoriz- ing monstrous practices as fantastic opportunities to transcend the established spatial con- ditions. The selected works offer a means to consider the transformation of rejected hu- man and territorial bodies into non-institutionalized potential for regeneration. The article works on the ambivalence between the warning of the uncanny and the vision of the transformed contexts, the conception of a space of dissent and grafts. Such viscosities, despite their complexity, retain a potentially generative disorder, not to be suppressed but to be engaged in a discursively implicated practice with the unexpected, bringing human- ity closer to a concept of wild, ever-changing transformation.
Downloads
References
Aime, M., Papotti, D., L’altro e l’altrove. Antropologia, geografia e turismo, Einaudi, Torino 2012.
Arnesano, G., Attivismo per salvaguardare il Delta del Po. Intervista all'artista Adelita Husni-Bey, in “www.artribune.com”, 21 novembre 2023.
Basso profilo, CAMPOTTO: accordi di comunità verso un nuovo piano di stazione, July 23, 2023, online: https://bassoprofilo.org/2023/07/27/campotto-accordi-di-comunita-verso-un-nuovo-piano-di-stazione/.
Billo, E., Mountz, A., For Institutional Ethnography: Geographical Approaches to Institutions and the Everyday, in “Progress in Human Geography,” 40/2, 2016, pp. 199-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515572269
Superstudio, Utopia, Antiutopia, Topia, in G. Mastrigli (a cura di), Superstudio. Opere 1966-1978, Quodlibet, Macerata 2016.
Braidotti, R., Madri mostri e macchine, Manifestolibri, Roma 2005.
FAM, Identità Mutanti. Dalla piega alla piaga: esseri delle contaminazioni contemporanee, Costa & Nolan, Genova 1997.
D’Amico, E., Padovaland, linguaggio e paesaggio, in “Doppiozero”, 2 gennaio 2021, online: https://www.doppiozero.com/padovaland-linguaggio-e-paesaggio.
Daston, L., Park, K., Wonders and the Order of Nature 1150-1750, Zone Books, New York 1998.
de Leonardis, O., Le istituzioni. Come e perché parlarne, Carocci, Roma 2001.
Fiorani, E., Selvaggio e domestico, Franco Muzzio, Padova 1993.
HPO, Provinciale, online: https://h-p-o.eu/provinciale.
Huet, M. H., Monstrous Imagination, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1993.
Metta, A., Il paesaggio è un mostro. Città selvatiche e nature ibride, DeriveApprodi, Roma 2022.
Mol, A., The Body Multiple, Duke University Press, Durham-London 2002.
Natale, F., Aprire la scatola nera. Spettatorialità e dispositivi attenzionali partecipativi nell’utilizzo degli spazi pubblici, in A. D’Ammando, T. Morawski, S. Velotti, Urban Forms of Life. Per una critica delle forme di vita urbane, Quodlibet, Macerata 2023, pp. 139-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.4688084.12
Russell, L., Glitch Feminism. A Manifesto, Verso, London 2020.
Smith D. E., The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology, Northeastern University Press, Boston 1987.
van Campenhout, E., La curatela come mentalità ambientale, in P. Di Matteo (a cura di) Performance + curatela, Luca Sossella Editore, Roma 2021, pp. 33–46.
Vanhee, S., The Fantastic Institutions, in “Nu in de Kunsten”, August 20th, 2022, online: https://www.kunsten.be/nu-in-de-kunsten/the-fantastic-institutions/.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Valentina Rizzi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in Itinera are required to accept the following conditions:
1. The authors retain the rights on their paper and lincese the journal the right of first publication. The paper is also licensed under a Creative Commons License, which allows others to share it, by indicating intellectual authorship and its first publication in Itinera.
2. Authors may adhere to other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the published version of the paper (ex. deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monograph), provided that its first publication in Itinera is indicated.
3. Authors can disseminate their paper online (ex. in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, since this can lead to productive exchanges and increase quotations of the published work (See “The Effect of Open Access”).


