“In ossequio a una norma il cui senso ci sfugge”. Writing with Bruno Celano
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54103/milanlawreview/24212Keywords:
Bruno Celano, Marco Brigaglia, Legal Philosophy, Process of writing, PsychodeonticAbstract
The title of this article is the incipit of a formula used by Bruno Celano, to be placed in the first note of the two-handed essays. In its complete version it is as follows: «In complying with an Italian rule, whose point we do not fully understand, we declare that sections X and Y are by Bruno Celano and sections W and Z are by N». Given the highly dialogic process of writing that took place with Celano, we can easily understand why he, with gentle irreverence, obeyed by disagreeing to attribute ownership of each section to each author. In his vast production, publications with another author are few and recent. However, recounting the creative practice of joint writing allows us to show a distinctive feature of Bruno Celano's entire oeuvre, which was thinking and researching in dialogue. In the current paper, Clelia Bartoli, Marco Brigaglia, and Giuseppe Rocché trace some aspects of the backstage of Celano's work, especially in the utmost years marked by illness.
Downloads
References
C. Bartoli, B. Celano, Apologia del libero mercato, in Rivista di filosofia del diritto, 2019, n. 2, p. 297-326
C. Bartoli, Inchiesta a Ballarò. Il diritto visto dal margine, Navarra, Palermo, 2019
F. Biondo, B. Celano, Premessa al fascicolo monografico Il diritto a sbagliare, in Ragion Pratica, 2005, vol. 25, p. 13-16
M. Brigaglia, B. Celano, Presentazione al fascicolo monografico I limiti dei diritti, in Ragion Pratica, 2007, vol. 29, p. 321-324
M. Brigaglia, B. Celano, Presentazione alla sezione monografica Diritti umani, fra norme, fatti e retorica, in Ragion Pratica, 2014, vol. 43, p. 415-418
M. Brigaglia, B. Celano, Reasons, Rules, Exceptions: Towards a Psychological Account, in Analisi e diritto, 2017, p. 131-144
M. Brigaglia, B. Celano, Rivoluzione cognitivista e teoria del diritto: un programma di ricerca, in Diritto e Questioni Pubbliche, 2017, n. 2, p. 523-535
M. Brigaglia, B. Celano, Eight Questions for the Speakers, in Materiali per una storia della cultura giuridica, 2019, n. 1, p. 113-119
M. Brigaglia, B. Celano, Constitutive Rules: The Symbolization Account, in Ratio Juris, 2022, vol. 35, p. 244-262 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12327
B. Celano, Lezioni di filosofia del diritto. Costituzionalismo, Stato di diritto, codificazione, diritto naturale, positivismo giuridico, Giappichelli, Torino, 2021
M. Friedman, R. Friedman, Free to Choose: A Personal Statement, Hartcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, London, 1980
J. Locke (1689), The Second Treatise, in P. Laslett (eds.), Two Treatises of Government, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009
M. Maldonado, P. Luque (a cura di), Discutendo con Bruno Celano, Marcial Pons, Madrid, Barcelona, Buenos Aires, São Paulo, 2020
K. Marx, Il capitale, libro I, Utet, Torino, 2009 (1867)
J. Raz, Practical reasons and norms, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1975
J. Waldron, The Harm in Hate Speech, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674065086
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Milan Law Review

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.


