N. 2 (2023): 2/2023
Saggi

Street-Level Bureaucrats e integrazione dei migranti: Tra norma e implementazione

Vittorio Lannutti
Università degli Studi di Urbino

Pubblicato 2023-12-05

Parole chiave

  • street-level bureaucracy,
  • politiche migratorie,
  • networking,
  • decisori politici

Abstract

L’articolo affronta la questione di come gli street-level bureaucrats si sono adattati e hanno reagito alle difficoltà causate dai cambiamenti decisi dai policy maker nel campo delle politiche sociali e in particolare nelle politiche migratorie. Questi cambiamenti sono stati caratterizzati essenzialmente dal taglio della spesa sociale. Il tema è stato affrontato attraverso l'analisi empirica condotta con due ricerche in altrettanti contesti italiani, grazie alle quali è stato possibile effettuare un confronto ed evidenziare punti in comune e differenze degli street-level bureaucrats dei due territori.

Downloads

I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. Ambrosini, M., (2020), Sociologia delle migrazioni, Bologna, il Mulino.
  2. Aslan, P. et al., (2021), Door Openers? Public Officials as Supportive Actors in the Labour Market Participation of Descendants of Immigrants in Sweden, Nordic Social Work Research, 11, 3, pp. 199-212.
  3. Barberis, E., (2010), Il ruolo degli operatori sociali dell’immigrazione nel welfare locale, Rivista delle Politiche Sociali, 24, 1, pp. 45-60.
  4. Barberis, E., Boccagni, P., (2014), Blurred rights, local practices: Social work and immigration in Italy, British Journal of Social Work, 44, pp. 70-87. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcu041.
  5. Barberis, E., Boccagni, P., (2017), Il lavoro sociale con le persone immigrate: Strumenti per la formazione e la pratica interculturale dei servizi, Sant’Arcangelo di Romagna (Rn), Maggioli.
  6. Barberis, E., Paraciani, R., Sarius, T., (2019), Tra il dire e il fare: la prospettiva street-level e l’implementazione delle politiche di welfare. Nota introduttiva al focus, Politiche Sociali/Social Policies, settembre-dicembre, 3, 2019, pp. 389-406. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.7389/95408.
  7. Barnard, C., (1940), The Nature of Leadership, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
  8. Belabas, W., Gerrits, L., (2017), Going the Extra Mile? How Street-Level Bureaucrats Deal with the Integration of Immigrants, Social Policy & Administration, 51(1), 133-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12184
  9. Borrelli, M. L., (2021), Encounters of Despair. Street-Level Bureaucrat and Migrant Interactions in Sweden and Switzerland, Anthropologica, 63, 1, pp. 1-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18357/anthropologica6312021272.
  10. Brodkin, E. Z., (2011), Policy Work: Street-Level Organizations under New Managerialism, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, Supplement 2, 253-277.
  11. Brodkin, E. Z., (2020), Discretion in the Welfare State, in Evans, T., Hupe, P., eds., Discretion and the Quest for Controlled Freedom, Cham, Springer, pp. 63-78.
  12. Bucken-Knapp, G., Omanovic, V., Spehar, A., (2020), Institutions and Organizations of Refugee Integration: Bosnian-Herzegovinian and Syrian Refugees in Sweden, Cham, Palgrave Macmillan.
  13. Campesi, G., (2021), Geografia dei confini, Sociologia del diritto, 3, pp. 15-42. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/SD2021-003002.
  14. Caponio, T., Borkert, M., (2010), The Local Dimension of Migration Policymaking, Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press.
  15. Caponio, T., Jones-Correa M., (2017), Theorising Migration Policy in Multilevel States: The Multilevel Governance Perspective, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44, 12, pp. 1-17 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1341705.
  16. Castles, S., (2010), Understanding Global Migration: A Social Transformative Perspective, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36, 1565-1586. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2010.489381.
  17. Castles, S., Miller, M. J., (2012), L’era delle migrazioni: Popoli in movimento nel mondo contemporaneo, Bologna, Odoya.
  18. Cnel, Ministero del Lavoro e delle Politiche Sociali, Centro Studi e Ricerche Idos, (2013), Indici di integrazione degli immigrati. IX Rapporto, Roma, CNEL Consiglio Nazionale dell’Economia e del Lavoro.
  19. Dubois, V., (2012), The Fields of Public Policy, in Hilgers M., Mangez, E., eds., Social Field Theory: Concept and Applications, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  20. Edlinis, M., Larrison J., (2018), Street-level bureaucrats and the governance of unaccompanied migrant children, Public Policy and Administration, 35, 7, pp. 403-423. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0952076718811438.
  21. Eule, T. G., Borrelli, L. M., Lindberg, A., Wyss, A., (2019), Migrants before the Law: Contested Migration Control in Europe, London, Palgrave Macmillan.
  22. Evans, T., (2010), Professional Discretion in Welfare Services beyond Street-Level Bureaucracy, Burlington, VT, Ashgate.
  23. Evans, T., Hupe, P., (2020), Discretion and the Quest for Controlled Freedom, Cham, Palgrave Macmillan.
  24. Hagelund, A., (2010), Dealing with the Dilemmas: Integration at the Street-Level in Norway, International Migration, 48, 2, pp. 79-102.
  25. Holder, A., Shawn, T. F., (2020), The Bureaucratic Encounter and Shifting Social Constructions Among Migrant Youth During the DACA Application Process, Administrative Theory Praxis, 42, 3, pp. 319-339.
  26. Hupe, P., (2013), Dimensions of Discretion: Specifying the Object of Street-Level Bureaucracy Research, Der Moderne Staat - Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management, 6, 2, pp. 425-440.
  27. Hupe, P., Buffat, A., (2014), A Public Service Gap: Capturing Contexts in a Comparative Approach of Street-Level Bureaucracy, Public Management Review, 16, 4, pp. 548-569.
  28. IDOS, (2022), Dossier Statistico Immigrazione 2022, Roma, IDOS.
  29. Lannutti, V., (2021), Verso una società inclusiva e non divisa, in Ceschi, S., Stocchiero, A., a cura di, Una strada accidentata. Italia e Europa tra politiche migratorie e processi di integrazione, Roma, CeSPI, Donzelli, pp. 139-142.
  30. Lipsky, M., (1980), Street-level Bureaucracy, New York, Russell Sage Foundation.
  31. Lotta, G., Pres, R., (2019), Street-level bureaucracy research and social inequality, in Hupe, P., Research Handbook on Street-Level Bureaucracy: The Ground Floor of Government in Context, Handbook of Research on Public Policy series, Northampton, Edward Elgar, pp. 86-101.
  32. Maynard-Moody, S., Musheno, M., (2000), State Agent or Citizen Agent: Two Narratives of Discretion, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 2, pp. 329-358.
  33. Miaz, J., (2021), Asylum decision-making and discretion: Types of room for maneuver in refugee status determination, Sociologia del diritto, 3, pp. 114-139. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/SD2021-003006.
  34. Murger, F., (1993), Sociology of Law for a Postliberal Society, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 27, pp. 89-125.
  35. Oberfield, Z. W., (2010), Rule Following and Discretion at Government’s Frontlines: Continuity and Change during Organization Socialization, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, 4, 735-755.
  36. Omidvar, R., (2012), Introduction: From Practice to Policy, in The Maytree Foundation Practice to Policy. Lessons from Local Leadership Immigrant Integration, Toronto, The Maytree Foundation, pp. 7-8.
  37. Paraciani, R., Rizza, R., (2020), Le professioni della discrezionalità. Professionalità e discrezionalità tra gli street-level bureaucrats, Professionalità studi, 3, pp. 1-11.
  38. Portillo, S., Rudes, D. S., (2014), Construction of Justice at the Street-level, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 10, 1, 321-334.
  39. Ratzmann, N., (2021), Deserving of Social Support? Street-Level Bureaucrats’ Decision on EU Migrants’ Benefit Claims in Germany, Social Policy and Society, 20, 3, pp. 509-520. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1474746421000026.
  40. Save the Children, (2022), Che cos’è la povertà educativa: definizione e cause. Consultabile all’indirizzo: https://www.savethechildren.it/blog-notizie/che-cosa-e-poverta-educativa-definizione-e-cause.
  41. Schultz, C., (2020), Ambiguous Goals, Uneven Implementation – How Immigration Offices Shape Internal Immigration Control in Germany, Comparative Migration Studies, 8, 1, pp. 10-31.
  42. Simmel, G., (2018), Sociologia, Milano, Meltemi.
  43. Tomasic, R., (1987), Continuity and Change in the Sociology of Law, Adelaide Law Review, 11, pp. 70-82.
  44. Ulutas, C., (2021), Street-Level Bureaucrats and Provision of Welfare Services to Forced Migrants in Turkey, Journal of Identity and Migration Studies, 15, 1, pp. 29-49.
  45. Varsanyi, M. W., (2008), Rescaling the ‘Alien,’ Rescaling Personhood: Neoliberalism, Immigration, and the State. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 98, 4, pp. 877-896.
  46. Verduci, A., (2021), Street-level bureaucracy: per una burocrazia “umana”, Consultabile all’indirizzo: https://sociologicamente.it/street-level-bureaucracy-per-una-burocrazia-umana/, sito consultato il 24 marzo 2023.
  47. Zincone, G., Caponio, T., (2004), Immigrant and Immigration Policy-Making: the Case of Italy. IMISCOE, Working Paper, 9, pp. 1-21.
  48. Zincone, G., Caponio, T., (2006), The Multilevel Governance of Migration, in Penninx, R., Berger, M., Kraal, K., eds., The Dynamics of International Migration and Settlement in Europe. A State of the Art, IMISCOE Joint Studies Series, Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, pp. 269-304.