Fear as an Infrastructure of Power. From the War on Terror to the Chinese Challenge

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54103/2612-6672/31247

Keywords:

fear, security, United States, China, foreign policy, securitization

Abstract

This article examines fear as a structural technology of governance in United States foreign policy and as a discursive infrastructure capable of integrating external security, domestic politics, and transformations in the international order. Drawing on a theoretical framework that combines political realism, securitization theory, and legal-political critiques of the state of exception, the study reconstructs the evolution of threat narratives in the United States. It shows how terrorism, transnational organized crime, non-state armed militias, and states perceived as hostile became, particularly in the post-9/11 period, the central elements of a profound restructuring of security institutions, technological policies, and the political economy of defence. The article then focuses on the most recent transformation of this paradigm, highlighting the shift of fear from asymmetric violent threats to systemic competition with China. While primarily understood as an economic, technological, and infrastructural challenge, this competition has increasingly been recoded within a military-derived grammar of security. The analysis contrasts the American construction of threat with the different Chinese conception of security, which emphasizes internal stability and a relational management of international order. In doing so, it argues that the rivalry between the two powers reflects not only a conflict of interests but also a deeper divergence in the political grammars through which security itself is conceptualized. Finally, the article contends that the normalization of fear as an ordinary language of governance produces significant consequences both for the structure of the international system and for the quality of American democracy, encouraging the persistence of exceptional measures, the expansion of securitarian logic into civilian and economic spheres, and an increasing permeability between external conflict and internal tension.

References

T. Hobbes, Leviatano, trad. it., Laterza, Roma-Bari, 2009.

D.D. Eisenhower, Farewell Address, 17 gennaio 1961, National Archives.

C. Robin, Fear: The History of a Political Idea, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004.

C. Schmitt, Teologia politica. Quattro capitoli sulla dottrina della sovranità, trad. it. G. Miglio - P. Schiera, Il Mulino, Bologna, 1972.

C. Schmitt, Il concetto di "politico", Il Mulino, Bologna, 1972.

B. Buzan, O. Wæver, Security. A New Framework for Analysis, Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder-London, 2003.

G. Agamben, Stato di eccezione, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino, 2003.

D. Dyzenhaus, The Constitution of Law: Legality in a Time of Emergency, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006.

H.J. Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations. The Struggle for Power and Peace, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1948.

R. Aron, Pace e guerra tra le nazioni, Etas, Milano, 1970.

K.N. Waltz, Theory of International Politics, Addison-Wesley, Reading (MA), 1979.

L.W. Bellocchio, Tutto è potenza. La competizione tra le grandi potenze nell'era post-bipolare, Guerini Scientifica, Milano, 2023.

A.J. Bacevich, The New American Militarism. How Americans Are Seduced by War, Oxford University Press, Oxford-New York, 2005.

C. Johnson, The Sorrows of Empire. Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic, Metropolitan Books, New York, 2004.

M. Foucault, Sicurezza, territorio, popolazione. Corso al Collège de France (1977-1978), Feltrinelli, Milano, 2005.

Y. Xuetong, Leadership and the Rise of Great Powers, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2019.

Y. Xuetong, Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2011.

Q. Yaqing, A Relational Theory of World Politics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2018.

G. Allison, Destined for War. Can America and China Escape Thucydides's Trap?, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston-New York, 2017.

M. Beckley, Unrivaled. Why America Will Remain the World's Sole Superpower, Cornell University Press, Ithaca-London, 2018.

M.J. Glennon, National Security and Double Government, Oxford University Press, New York, 2015.

A. Orford, Reading Humanitarian Intervention. Human Rights and the Use of Force in International Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003.

A.M. Slaughter, A New World Order, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2004.

G.J. Ikenberry, Liberal Leviathan. The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2011.

I. Krastev, S. Holmes, The Light that Failed. A Reckoning, Allen Lane, London, 2019.

Articoli in rivista:

B. Buzan, Will the 'Global War on Terrorism' Be the New Cold War?, in «International Affairs», 82, 6, 2006.

H. Farrell, A.L. Newman, Weaponized Interdependence. How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion, in «International Security», 44, 1, 2019.

W. Jisi, China's Search for a Grand Strategy: A Rising Great Power Finds Its Way, in «Foreign Affairs», 90, 2, 2011.

J.J. Chin, Understanding National Security Strategies Through Time, Texas National Security Review, 2023.

D. Bigo, Security and Immigration: Toward a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease, in «Alternatives», 27, 2002, 65.

Contributi in volume:

A. Colombo, Nascondere con le parole. La normalizzazione del concetto di "terrorismo", in A. Colombo (a cura di), I conti col Novecento. Le violenze di massa tra riconoscimento e diniego, Milano University Press, Milano, 2025, 167-179.

Published

2026-05-21

How to Cite

Al hmood, A. H. A. (2026). Fear as an Infrastructure of Power. From the War on Terror to the Chinese Challenge. Nuovi Autoritarismi E Democrazie: Diritto, Istituzioni, Società (NAD-DIS), 8(1). https://doi.org/10.54103/2612-6672/31247