Field Studies and the Study of Power: Reflections from the Margins of the Indian Social Landscape
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54103/2612-6672/27741Keywords:
Methodological Individualism, Methodological Holism, Power, Field-Based Research, IndiaAbstract
Starting from an acknowledgement of the inescapability of the question of the analytical-methodological space for the study of power, this paper presents a reflection upon an analytical-methodological principle that has increasingly informed the terrain of social sciences, namely methodological individualism, as it features in neoclassical economics. Contextually, by drawing upon the author’s research experience, the paper offers some reflections on the dialogue between theory and the field. It takes an analytical approach informed by methodological holism and which adopts the lens of critical political economy to interrogate the unfolding of specific social power dynamics. In so doing, the paper dwells upon the importance recognized, within such an approach, of individual life stories.
References
H. Veltmeyer, New Social Movements in Latin America: The dynamics of class and identity, in The Journal of Peasant Studies, No. 1, 1997, 143.
F. García-Quero, J. Ollero-Perán, Is Neoclassical Economics Scientific Knowledge Detached from Ethics? A Kantian Answer, an Institutionalist Alternative, in Review of Radical Political Economics, No. 1, 2015, 56–69
B. Ollman, What Is Political Science? What Should It Be?, in New Political Science, No. 4, 2000.
R. Swedberg, The New ‘Battle of Methods’, in Challenge, No. 1, 1990.
M. Adduci The Relentless de Facto Privatization Process of Chilika Lake, India, in Journ
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Matilde Adduci

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.







