Theories of Emotions

Aesthetic Comprehension of Abstract and Emotion Concepts: Kant’s Aesthetics Renewed

Mojca Küplen

Abstract


In § 49 of the Critique of the Power of Judgment Kant puts forward a view that the feeling of pleasure in the experience of the beautiful can be stimulated not merely by perceptual properties, but by ideas and thoughts as well. The aim of this paper is to argue that aesthetic ideas fill in the emptiness that abstract and emotion concepts on their own would have without empirical intuitions. That is, aesthetic ideas make these concepts more accessible to us, by creating image schemas that allow us to think about these abstract concepts in a way linked to sensory experience, thereby imbuing them with a more substantive meaning and understanding.


Full Text

PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.13130/2039-9251/10509

Riferimenti bibliografici


ALTARRIBA, Jeanette, “Expressions of Emotion as Mediated by Context”, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11/02, 2008, pp. 165-167.

BARSALOU, Lawrence, “Perceptual Symbol Systems”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22/4, 1999, pp. 577-660.

–, WIEMER-HASTINGS, Katja, “Situating Abstract Concepts’, in D. Pecher, R. A. Zwaan (ed. by), Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2015, pp. 129-163.

BERRY, Kenneth, “Kandinsky, Kant, and a Modern Mandala”, The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 42/4, 2008, pp. 105-110.

CHIGNELL, Andrew, “Kant on the Normativity of Taste: The Role of Aesthetic Ideas”, Australian Journal of Philosophy, 85/3, 2007, pp. 415-433.

CRAWFORD, Donald, “Kant’s Theory of Creative Imagination”, in P. Guyer (ed. by), Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgment: Critical Essays, Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, Maryland 2003, pp. 143-170.

ELLIS, Ralph, Questioning Consciousness: The Interplay of Imagery, Cognition, and Emotion in the Human Brain, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam/Philadelphia 1995.

FORRESTER, Stefan, “Why Kantian Symbols Cannot Be Kantian Metaphors”, Southwest Philosophy Review, 28/2, 2012, pp. 107-127.

FORSEY, Jane, “Metaphor and Symbol in the Interpretation of Art”, Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie continentale, 8/3, 2004, pp. 573-586.

GENDLIN, Theodore Eugene, Experiencing and the Creation of Meaning: A Philosophical and Psychological Approach to the Subjective, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, Illinois 1997.

JOHNSON, Mark, The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago/London 2007.

KANT, Immanuel, Critique of Pure Reason (Kritik der reinen Vernunft), translated by W.S. Pluhar, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis 1996.

–, Critique of the Power of Judgment (Kritik der Urteilskraft), translated by P. Guyer and E. Matthews, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2000.


Refback

  • Non ci sono refbacks, per ora.


Creative Commons License
This opera by Itinera - Rivista di filosofia e di teoria delle arti is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione-Non commerciale-Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.
Based on a work at riviste.unimi.it.

Registrazione n° 593 del 12/11/2010 del Tribunale di Milano
2010 - Pubblicato in Italia. Alcuni diritti riservati