Aesthetic Comprehension of Abstract and Emotion Concepts: Kant’s Aesthetics Renewed
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13130/2039-9251/10509Abstract
In § 49 of the Critique of the Power of Judgment Kant puts forward a view that the feeling of pleasure in the experience of the beautiful can be stimulated not merely by perceptual properties, but by ideas and thoughts as well. The aim of this paper is to argue that aesthetic ideas fill in the emptiness that abstract and emotion concepts on their own would have without empirical intuitions. That is, aesthetic ideas make these concepts more accessible to us, by creating image schemas that allow us to think about these abstract concepts in a way linked to sensory experience, thereby imbuing them with a more substantive meaning and understanding.
Downloads
References
ALTARRIBA, Jeanette, “Expressions of Emotion as Mediated by Context”, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11/02, 2008, pp. 165-167.
BARSALOU, Lawrence, “Perceptual Symbol Systems”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22/4, 1999, pp. 577-660.
–, WIEMER-HASTINGS, Katja, “Situating Abstract Concepts’, in D. Pecher, R. A. Zwaan (ed. by), Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2015, pp. 129-163.
BERRY, Kenneth, “Kandinsky, Kant, and a Modern Mandala”, The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 42/4, 2008, pp. 105-110.
CHIGNELL, Andrew, “Kant on the Normativity of Taste: The Role of Aesthetic Ideas”, Australian Journal of Philosophy, 85/3, 2007, pp. 415-433.
CRAWFORD, Donald, “Kant’s Theory of Creative Imagination”, in P. Guyer (ed. by), Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgment: Critical Essays, Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, Maryland 2003, pp. 143-170.
ELLIS, Ralph, Questioning Consciousness: The Interplay of Imagery, Cognition, and Emotion in the Human Brain, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam/Philadelphia 1995.
FORRESTER, Stefan, “Why Kantian Symbols Cannot Be Kantian Metaphors”, Southwest Philosophy Review, 28/2, 2012, pp. 107-127.
FORSEY, Jane, “Metaphor and Symbol in the Interpretation of Art”, Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie continentale, 8/3, 2004, pp. 573-586.
GENDLIN, Theodore Eugene, Experiencing and the Creation of Meaning: A Philosophical and Psychological Approach to the Subjective, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, Illinois 1997.
JOHNSON, Mark, The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago/London 2007.
KANT, Immanuel, Critique of Pure Reason (Kritik der reinen Vernunft), translated by W.S. Pluhar, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis 1996.
–, Critique of the Power of Judgment (Kritik der Urteilskraft), translated by P. Guyer and E. Matthews, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2000.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in Itinera are required to accept the following conditions:
1. The authors retain the rights on their paper and lincese the journal the right of first publication. The paper is also licensed under a Creative Commons License, which allows others to share it, by indicating intellectual authorship and its first publication in Itinera.
2. Authors may adhere to other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the published version of the paper (ex. deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monograph), provided that its first publication in Itinera is indicated.
3. Authors can disseminate their paper online (ex. in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, since this can lead to productive exchanges and increase quotations of the published work (See “The Effect of Open Access”).
