Charisma in conservation biology. Preliminary notes to an aesthetic-philosophical approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54103/2039-9251/29670Keywords:
extinction, bias, Anthropocene, Max WeberAbstract
The aim of this paper is to explore the notion of charisma in conservation biology.
In recent years, this notion has become very popular among conservationists, for example in the expression “charismatic megafauna.” In general, in conservation biology, species are described as “charismatic” when they exert a non-ordinary impact on humans – specifically in their capacity to capture attention, engage the imagination, and evoke memorable emotional responses.
Despite its widespread usage, the notion of charisma has, with few exceptions, received limited critical scrutiny so far from a conceptual and philosophical standpoint within the conservation sciences.
This paper sets out to begin that task, by returning to the Weberian origin of the concept and putting forward an interpretation of non-human charisma as an emergent, relational, context-dependent, and ecologically collective phenomenon.
Downloads
References
Adamo M., Sousa R., Wipf S., Correia R.A.,, Lumia A., Mucciarelli M. et al., Dimension and impact of biases in funding for species and habitat conservation, “Biological Conservation”, 2022, 272, 109636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109636
Albert C., Luque G.M., Courchamp F., The twenty most charismatic species, 2028, “PLoS ONE”, 13 (7), e0199149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199149
Arielli E., Carisma tra estetica e politica, in H.-C. Günther (ed.), Kunst im zwanzigsten Jahrhundert Zwischen Klassizismus und Moderne, zwischen privatem und öffentlichem Raum, Verlag Traugott Bautz, Nordhausen 2017, pp. 151-178.
Barisione M., Reviving Metapersonal Charisma in Max Weber, “Political Theory”, 51 (3), 2023, pp. 530-556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00905917221129632
Berti E., Monsarrat S., Munk M., Jarvie S., Svenning J-.S., Body size is a good proxy for vertebrate charisma, “Biological Conservation”, 251, 2020, 108790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108790
Borghini A., Esistono proprietà intrinseche?, “Rivista di estetica”, 43, 2010, online since April 27 2017, accessed on June 25 2025. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/estetica/1813; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/estetica.1813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/estetica.1813
Brambilla M., Gustin M., Celada C., Species appeal predicts conservation status, “Biological Conservation”, 160, 2013, pp. 209-213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.02.006
Colléony A., Clayton S., Couvet D., Saint Jalme M., & Prévot A.-C., Human preferences for species conservation: Animal charisma trumps endangered status, “Biological Conservation”, 206, 2017, pp. 263-269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.11.035
Courchamp F., Jaric I., Albert C., Meinard Y., Ripple W.J., Chapron G., The paradoxical extinction of the most charismatic animals, “PLoS Biology”, 16 (4), 2018, e2003997. Available from: doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2003997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003997
DeKay M. L., & McClelland G.H., Probability and utility of endangered species preservation programs, “Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied”, 2(1), 1996, pp. 60-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//1076-898X.2.1.60
Desideri F., La percezione riflessa. Estetica e filosofia della mente, Raffaello Cortina, Milano 2011; Id., Origine dell’estetico. Dalle emozioni al giudizio, Carocci, Roma 2018.
Díaz S. et al, The IPBES Conceptual Framework – connecting nature and people, “Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainbaility”, 2015, 14, pp. 1-16.
Ducarme F., Luque G., Courchamp F., What are "charismatic species" for conservation biologists?, “BioSciences Master Reviews”, 2013, 1, pp. 1-8.
Fordahl C., Beyond Animal Charisma: A Sociological Approach to Charismatic Species, “Conservation & Society”, vol. 22, no. 1, 2024, pp. 14-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_118_22
Guénard B., Hughes A.C., Lainé C., Cannicci S., Russell B.D., Williams G.A., Limited and biased global conservation funding means most threatened species remain unsupported, “Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America”, 2025, 122 (9), e2412479122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2412479122
Gunnthorsdottir A., Physical attractiveness of an animal species as a decision factor for its preservation, “Anthrozoös: A Multidisciplinary Journal of the Interactions of People & Animals”, 14, 2001, pp. 204-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2752/089279301786999355
Isaac M., Fukushima C.S., Macura B. et al., How is the concept of charisma used in the academic literature about biodiversity conservation? A systematic map protocol., “Environmental Evidence”, 13, 29, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-024-00353-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-024-00353-2
Jarić I., Courchamp F., Correia R.A., Crowley S.L., Essl F., et al., The role of species charisma in biological invasions, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2020, 18, pp. 345-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2195
Jax K., Conservation Concepts. Rethinking Human-Nature Relationships, Routledge, London-New York 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003251002
Kraemer K., Charismatischer Habitus, “Berliner Journal für Soziologie”, 12, 2002, pp. 173-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03204051
Krause M., & Robinson K., Charismatic Species and Beyond: How Cultural Schemas and Organisational Routines shape Conservation, “Conservation and Society”, 15 (3), 2017, pp. 313–321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_16_63
Lenda M., Skórka P., Mazur B., Sutherland W., Tryjanowski P., Moroń D., Meijaard E., Possingham H.P., Wilson K.A., Effects of amusing memes on concern for unappealing species, “Conservation Biology”, 2020doi:10.1111/cobi.13523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13523
Lorimer J., Nonhuman Charisma, “Environment and Planning D: Society and Space”, 25 (5), pp. 911-932. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/d71j
Ludwig D. et al., Transdisciplinary Philosophy of Science: Meeting the Challenge of Indigenous Expertise, “Philosophy of Science”, 2024, 91, 5, pp. 1221-1231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2023.127
M. Weber, Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, edited by G. Roth and C. Wittich, University of California Press, Berkeley-Los Angeles-London 2013
Macdonald E.A., Burnham D., Hinks A.E., Dickman A.J., Malhi Y., Macdonald D.W., Conservation inequality and the charismatic cat: Felis felicis, “Global Ecology and Conservation”, 3, 2015, pp. 851-866. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2015.04.006
Macdonald E.A., Hinks A., Weiss D.J., Dickman A., Burnham D., Sandom C.J., Malhi Y., Macdonald D.W., Identifying ambassador species for conservation marketing, “Global Ecology and Conservation”, 12, 2017, pp. 204-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2017.11.006
Mace G.M. , Possingham H.P., Leader-Williams N. , Prioritizing choices in conservation, in Key Topics in Conservation Biology, edited by D. MacDonald, K. Service, Blackwell, Oxford 2007, pp. 17-34.
Matteucci G., Estetica e natura umana. La mente estesa tra percezione, emozione ed espressione, Carocci, Roma 2019.
Militz T.A., Foale S., The “Nemo Effect”: Perception and reality of Finding Nemo's impact on the marine aquarium fisheries, “Fish and Fisheries”, 2017, 18, pp. 596-606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12202
Napoli P., Le charisme et la loi. Remarques sur une bipolarité politique, in D.Y., Cohen (dir.), Formes de l’autorité, de la grandeur au charisme, “Politika”, https://www.politika.io/fr/article/charisme-loi-remarques-bipolarite-politique
Palma M., Carisma e demoni. Fonti ed effetti di un concetto politico, “Scienza & Politica. Per Una Storia Delle Dottrine”, 2020, 32(63), pp. 143-159.
Perullo N., Aesthetics Without Objects and Subjects. Relational Thinking for Global Challenges, Bloomsbury, London 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350496941
Potts J., A History of Charisma, Palgrave MacMillan, London 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244832
Prevot A-C., Julliard R., Clayton S., Historical evidence for nature disconnection in a 70-year time series of Disney animated films, “Public understanding of science”, 2014, 24. 10.1177/0963662513519042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513519042
Prokop P., Zvaríková M., Zvarík M., Ježová Z., & Fedor P., Charismatic species should be large: The role of admiration and fear, “People and Nature”, 6, 2024, pp. 945-957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10504
Rodrigues A.S.L. et al., The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation, “Trends in Ecology & Evolution”, 2006, 21, 2, pp. 71-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.10.010
Saito Y., Aesthetics of care: practice in everyday life, Bloomsbury, London 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350134225
Scaffai N., Sotto l’inesauribile superficie delle cose. Il paradigma della profondità nell’immaginario dell’Antropocene, Aboca, Sansepolcro 2025.
Shever E., More-than-human charisma, iconic fossils, and palaeontologists in the United States, “Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute”, 31, 2025, pp. 584-604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.14263
Skibins J.C., Powell R.B., Hallo J.C., Charisma and conservation: charismatic megafauna’s influence on safari and zoo tourists’ pro-conservation behaviors, “Biodiversity and Conservation”, 2013, 22, 10.1007/s10531-013-0462-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0462-z
Soulé M.E., What is Conservation Biology?, “BioScience”, 35, 11, 1985, pp. 727-734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1310054
Titley M.A., Snaddon J.L., Turner E.C., Scientific research on animal biodiversity is systematically biased towards vertebrates and temperate regions, “PLoS ONE”, 12 (12), 2017, e0189577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189577
Tuccari F., Carisma e leadership nel pensiero di Max Weber, FrancoAngeli, Milano 1991.
Turner, S., Charisma Reconsidered, “Journal of Classical Sociology”, 3, 5, 2003, pp. 5-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X03003001692
Verissimo D., MacMillan D.C., Smith R.J., Toward a systematic approach for identifying conservation flagships, in “Conservation Letters”, 2011, 4, pp. 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00151.x
Weber M., On Charisma and Institution Building: Selected Papers, edited and with an introduction by S.N. Eisenstadt, Chicago University Press, Chicago 1968.
Weber M., The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, translated by Talcott Parsons, with an introduction by Anthony Giddens, Routledge, London-New York 1992.
Weber M., The Vocation lectures. “Science as a Vocation” – “Politics as a Vocation”, edited and with an introduction by D. Owen, T-B. Strong, translated by R. Livingstone, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis-Cambridge 2004.
Wu Y., Xie L., Huang S., Li P., Yuan Z., Liu W., Using social media to strengthen public awareness of wildlife conservation, “Ocean & Coastal Management”, 153, 2018, pp. 76-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.12.010
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mariagrazia Portera
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in Itinera are required to accept the following conditions:
1. The authors retain the rights on their paper and lincese the journal the right of first publication. The paper is also licensed under a Creative Commons License, which allows others to share it, by indicating intellectual authorship and its first publication in Itinera.
2. Authors may adhere to other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the published version of the paper (ex. deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monograph), provided that its first publication in Itinera is indicated.
3. Authors can disseminate their paper online (ex. in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, since this can lead to productive exchanges and increase quotations of the published work (See “The Effect of Open Access”).
