Beyond Capacity: Exakte Phantasie and the Reconfiguration of Educational Normativity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54103/2039-9251/29699Abstract
This article argues for rethinking education in the Anthropocene as a site for reconfiguring subjectivity, rather than a reactive response to crisis. Framing the climate crisis as an aesthetic and phenomenological challenge, following Scott Hamilton and Dipesh Chakrabarty, it explores how ontological insecurity undermines the imagination of alternative futures. Drawing on Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak’s concept of planetarity, the article proposes an ethical and epistemological shift beyond universalizing frameworks, foregrounding alterity and contingency as central to educational thought. The argument develops through Theodor W. Adorno’s negative dialectics and his notion of education after Auschwitz, offering a model of negative normativity grounded in critical reflection on historical rupture and epistemic limits. Central to this is Adorno’s concept of exakte Phantasie, reimagined here as a pedagogical practice of receptive and speculative imagination. As a form of ars inveniendi, it fosters critical hope and imaginative agency within conditions of ecological and ontological uncertainty. Adorno’s critical and material reconceptualization of imagination, I argue, offers a new – performative – interpretation of aesthetic education, which is attuned to address contemporary socioeconomical and ecological challenges.
Downloads
References
Adorno, T.W., The Actuality of Philosophy, in “Telos”, 31 (1977), pp. 120–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3817/0377031120
Adorno, T.W., Negative Dialectics, Taylor & Francis, London 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203479605
Adorno, T.W., Aesthetic Theory, Continuum, London 2002.
Adorno, T.W., Soziologische Schriften, 1. Aufl., Gesammelte Schriften, Band 8, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main 2003.
Adorno, T.W., Minima Moralia. Reflections on a Damaged Life, Verso, London-New York 2005.
Adorno, T.W., Critical Models. Interventions and Catchwords, Columbia University Press, New York 2005.
Bernstein, J.M., Adorno. Disenchantment and Ethics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164276
Biesta, G., Risking Ourselves in Education. Qualification, Socialization, and Subjectification Revisited, in “Educational Theory”, 70/1 (2020), pp. 89–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12411
Buck-Morss, S., Piaget, Adorno, and Dialectical Operations, in J.M. Broughton (ed. by), Critical Theories of Psychological Development, PATH in Psychology, Plenum Press, New York 1987, pp. 245–272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9886-9_9
Bünger, C., Negative Normativität. Zur prekären Konstitution pädagogischer Kritik, in W. Meseth et al. (eds.), Normativität in der Erziehungswissenschaft, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden 2019, pp. 95–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21244-5_5
Campbell, C., The Anthropocene Subject and Emancipation. The Challenge of “Emancipatory” Pedagogy in an Era of Climate Crisis, in N. Lacković et al. (eds.), Rethinking Education and Emancipation. Diverse Perspectives on Contemporary Challenges, Palgrave Studies in Educational Philosophy and Theory, Springer International Publishing, Cham 2024, pp. 87–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47044-8_5
Chakrabarty, D., The Climate of History in a Planetary Age, University of Chicago Press, Chicago-London 2021.
Cho, D., Adorno on Education or, Can Critical Self-Reflection Prevent the Next Auschwitz?, in “Historical Materialism”, 17/1 (2009), pp. 74–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156920608X357765
Davies, M.L., ‘Education after Auschwitz’ Revisited, in M.L. Davies, C.-C.W. Szejnmann (eds.), How the Holocaust Looks Now, Macmillan, London 2006, pp. 247–261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230286566_22
Gough, A., Education in the Anthropocene, in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.1391
Greenwood, D.A., Culture, Environment, and Education in the Anthropocene, in M.P. Mueller, D.J. Tippins, A.J. Stewart (eds.), Assessing Schools for Generation R (Responsibility), Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht 2014, pp. 279–292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2748-9_20
Hamilton, S., Securing Ourselves from Ourselves? The Paradox of “Entanglement” in the Anthropocene, in “Crime, Law and Social Change”, 68/5 (2017), pp. 579–595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-017-9704-4
Heins, V., Saying Things That Hurt. Adorno as Educator, in “Thesis Eleven”, 110/1 (2012), pp. 68–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513612450498
Holfelder, A.K., Towards a Sustainable Future with Education?, in “Sustainability Science”, 14/4 (2019), pp. 943–952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00682-z
Huhn, T., Aesthetic Education, Human Capacity, Freedom, in N. Ross (ed.), The Aesthetic Ground of Critical Theory, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham 2010, pp. 177–179.
Hulatt, O., Adorno’s Theory of Philosophical and Aesthetic Truth, Columbia University Press, New York 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/hula17724
Jagodzinski, J. (ed.), Precarious Future of Education. Risk and Uncertainty in Ecology, Curriculum, Learning, and Technology, Palgrave Macmillan, New York 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48691-2
Macdonald, I., Cold, Cold, Warm. Autonomy, Intimacy and Maturity in Adorno, in “Philosophy & Social Criticism”, 37/6 (2011), pp. 669–689. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453711402940
Pocius, A., Education as Performative Contradiction. Limits (And Possibilities) of Subjectification in the Anthropocene, in “Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia”, 53 (2025), pp. 42–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15388/ActPaed.2024.53.4
Sabolius, K., How Can We Learn from Milieus?, in “Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia”, 53 (2025), pp. 8–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15388/ActPaed.2024.53.1
Slater, G.B., Education as Recovery. Neoliberalism, School Reform, and the Politics of Crisis, in “Journal of Education Policy”, 30/1 (2015), pp. 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2014.904930
Sonu, D., Snaza, N., The Fragility of Ecological Pedagogy. Elementary Social Studies Standards and Possibilities of New Materialism, in “Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy”, 12/3 (2015), pp. 258–277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2015.1103671
Spivak, G.C., An Aesthetic Education in the Era of Globalization, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.) 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1n1bsfh
Thompson, C., Adorno and the Borders of Experience. The Significance of the Non-Identical for a ‘Different’ Theory of Bildung, in “Educational Theory”, 56/1 (2006), pp. 69–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2006.00004.x
Toscano, M., Quay, J., “How Dare You!” When an Ecological Crisis Is Impacted by an Educational Crisis. Temporal Insights via Arendt, in “Educational Philosophy and Theory”, 55/10 (2023), pp. 1137–1147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2082940
Wolfe, C., What Is Posthumanism?, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis 2010.
Wussow, P. von, Logik der Deutung. Adorno und die Philosophie, Königshausen & Neumann, Würzburg 2007.
Yacek, D., Dialectics of Education. Adorno on the Possibility of Bildung in Consumer Society, in “Philosophy of Education”, 72 (2016), pp. 204–213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47925/2016.204
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Audrius Pocius
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in Itinera are required to accept the following conditions:
1. The authors retain the rights on their paper and lincese the journal the right of first publication. The paper is also licensed under a Creative Commons License, which allows others to share it, by indicating intellectual authorship and its first publication in Itinera.
2. Authors may adhere to other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the published version of the paper (ex. deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monograph), provided that its first publication in Itinera is indicated.
3. Authors can disseminate their paper online (ex. in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, since this can lead to productive exchanges and increase quotations of the published work (See “The Effect of Open Access”).
